Liberal Fascism and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Liberal Fascism on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning [Hardcover]

Jonah Goldberg
4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (13 customer reviews)
List Price: CDN$ 38.50
Price: CDN$ 24.26 & FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details
You Save: CDN$ 14.24 (37%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Tuesday, October 21? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition --  
Hardcover CDN $24.26  
Paperback CDN $15.15  
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged CDN $21.41  
Join Amazon Student in Canada

Book Description

Jan. 8 2008

“Fascists,” “Brownshirts,” “jackbooted stormtroopers”—such are the insults typically hurled at conservatives by their liberal opponents. Calling someone a fascist is the fastest way to shut them up, defining their views as beyond the political pale. But who are the real fascists in our midst?

Liberal Fascism offers a startling new perspective on the theories and practices that define fascist politics. Replacing conveniently manufactured myths with surprising and enlightening research, Jonah Goldberg reminds us that the original fascists were really on the left, and that liberals from Woodrow Wilson to FDR to Hillary Clinton have advocated policies and principles remarkably similar to those of Hitler's National Socialism and Mussolini's Fascism.

Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist.

Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal.

Fascism was an international movement that appeared in different forms in different countries, depending on the vagaries of national culture and temperament. In Germany, fascism appeared as genocidal racist nationalism. In America, it took a “friendlier,” more liberal form. The modern heirs of this “friendly fascist” tradition include the New York Times, the Democratic Party, the Ivy League professoriate, and the liberals of Hollywood. The quintessential Liberal Fascist isn't an SS storm trooper; it is a female grade school teacher with an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore.

These assertions may sound strange to modern ears, but that is because we have forgotten what fascism is. In this angry, funny, smart, contentious book, Jonah Goldberg turns our preconceptions inside out and shows us the true meaning of Liberal Fascism.

Product Details

Product Description

From Publishers Weekly

In this provocative and well-researched book, Goldberg probes modern liberalism's spooky origins in early 20th-century fascist politics. With chapter titles such as Adolf Hitler: Man of the Left and Brave New Village: Hillary Clinton and the Meaning of Liberal Fascism—Goldberg argues that fascism has always been a phenomenon of the left. This is Goldberg's first book, and he wisely curbs his wry National Review style. Goldberg's study of the conceptual overlap between fascism and ideas emanating from the environmental movement, Hollywood, the Democratic Party and what he calls other left-wing organs is shocking and hilarious. He lays low such lights of liberal history as Margaret Sanger, apparently a radical eugenicist, and JFK, whose cult of personality, according to Goldberg, reeks of fascist political theater. Much of this will be music to conservatives' ears, but other readers may be stopped cold by the parallels Goldberg draws between Nazi Germany and the New Deal. The book's tone suffers as it oscillates between revisionist historical analyses and the application of fascist themes to American popular culture; nonetheless, the controversial arc Goldberg draws from Mussolini to The Matrix is well-researched, seriously argued—and funny. (Jan. 8)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


"Certain to attract interest...across the political spectrum." ---Booklist Starred Review --This text refers to the Audio CD edition.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful
Goldberg's book is a well-researched account of the dominant political philosophy of the last 200 years - collectivist fascism of one sort or another. While left-leaning detractors will have their knickers in a knot over Goldberg's account of political history, the bottom line is that he brings to the table some insightful analysis to the table on the similarities between socialism, nationalism and fascism - they all come from the same root: collectivism by elites that believe that they "know better".

There are some problems as Goldberg appears to work out his thoughts in the book rather than in his notepad, and while amusing to read for conservatives, I seriously doubt that Hillary Clinton justifes a whole chapter to her political views and background ... this just came across as political posturing and not very well thought out.

In the end, if Goldberg's work helps readers to view the political spectrum on a collectivist-individualist spectrum rather than a "left-right" or "socialist-fascist" spectrum, then we'll all be better for it.
Was this review helpful to you?
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Nanny state gone wild June 19 2009
In the intro, Goldberg discusses the confusion surrounding the term 'fascism' with reference to Roger Griffin, Emilio Gentile, Gilbert Allardyce, Ernst Nolte, Stanley Payne, Roger Eatwell and others. The phenomenon has many variants & names (with a fondness for words like 'movement' or 'action') whilst the manner of its expression is influenced by the national culture. Nowadays the term is loosely applied to 'anything not desirable.' The author investigates the characteristics of the movement, its roots in American Progressivism of the early 20th century, the branches that sprouted during the New Deal and similarities with the agenda of what is today called Liberalism in the USA.

First, he examines Mussolini, a favorite of the New York Times, New Republic, Hollywood and many intellectuals until his invasion of Ethiopia in 1934. This chapter includes sections on Jacobin Fascism with observations on the French Revolution, JJ Rousseau, Georges Sorel and Napoleon, and War, which deals with populism and pragmatism as forms of relativism. National Socialism predated Hitler, it competed with communism for the same support base, used identity politics and was not identical with Italian Fascism as Goldberg points out in the 2nd chapter. Further information on the similarities, differences and the danse macabre of shifting alliances in 1930s Europe is available in Sinisterism by Bruce Walker.

There's selective amnesia as regards Woodrow Wilson during whose presidency censorship, economic regulation, militarism, propaganda & corporatism dominated the USA. There were unimaginable crackdowns on the media, restrictions of civil liberties & many features of a police state.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
19 of 20 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Beware the Liberazis Among Us! April 16 2008
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
In his book, Liberal Fascism, Goldberg argues that fascism clearly belongs on the left side of the spectrum.

Upon reading this thesis I instinctively found it disturbing as if it seemed to go against the natural order of things. Of course the Nazi's and the Italian Fascists were on the far right. Are they not our society's very definition of the far right?

Yet why, asks Goldberg, if the Nazis were so far right on the political spectrum, did they brand themselves as socialists? Indeed, the very word Nazi comes from a shortening of the party's official name, die Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, - German for the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Similarly, why did Mussolini, whose parents read Das Kapital to him as a child, consider himself a 'socialist' right up until the moment of his execution at which his acolyte shouted, "Long live Mussolini, long live socialism!"

Goldberg argues, with considerable backing, that fascism began very much as a left-wing movement, with the added embrace of nationalism. In fact, Goldberg suggests that the first categorizing of fascists as right-wing only occurred after Stalin put out the directive that all opponents of the his rule of the Soviet Union, including Trotsky, were to be labeled as such in a bid for control of Germany.

Fascism, says Goldberg, was born of a "fascist moment" in Western civilization, when a coalition of intellectuals under various labels - progressive, communist, socialist - believed the era of liberal democracy was drawing to a close. Leaving little doubt with him that fascism was a project of the left.

Consider Cuba, prods Goldberg.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The Fascist Side to Liberalism June 12 2009
By Ian Gordon Malcomson HALL OF FAME TOP 10 REVIEWER
Goldberg, a regular contributer to the conservative National Review, takes on the liberal-progressive establishment in this book. His thesis is that the liberal in American society is nothing more than a person committed to pushing progressive causes using fascistic politics. He begins his argument on what history reveals as the close ties that existed between the early 20th century American progressive and the emerging Italian and German fascist movements. Both were mutual admirers of what they wanted to accomplish: the unity of the country. Goldberg even suggests that Wilson's decision to take America into war in 1917 is indisputable proof that he saw militarism as a fascistic means to promoting the will of the state. Woodrow Wilson, like his successor FDR with the NRA in the 30s, transformed the country into a more centrally-controlled state that combined the need to protect the individual and regulate big business in order to promote progress change. The rise of statism, a thinly disguised form of fascism, became known as the third way in which society could both unite and reform in the same breath; no longer reactionary or revolutionary to frustrate the advocates of social engineering on behalf of a utopian future. Later in the 20s and 30s, western media and fascist governments in Europe showered each other with mutual praise for their 'noble' endeavours to collectivize society for the greater good of all. Liberals have never satisfactorily answered the question as to who gets to determine what is good for everybody. They just automatically assume it is they who have come up with the progessive vision for change. Most of the book is taken up with examining where American left-wing ideologues have gone in their efforts to push liberal fascism or the third way. Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?
Most recent customer reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars The road to Fascism is paved with best intentions
There are a few things that we've learned as kids and have since taken for granted: the sun rises in the East and sets in the West, the birds fly south in the Winter, and north in... Read more
Published on May 18 2011 by Dr. Bojan Tunguz
3.0 out of 5 stars A Boook About Labels
"Liberal Fascism" speaks of the relationship between the Fascist intellectual tradition and practice and the Liberal-Progressive movement in Twentieth Century America. Read more
Published on Sept. 19 2010 by James Gallen
5.0 out of 5 stars It elevates the level of discussion
Essentially, the thesis of this noble book is that the American Liberalism has more in common with Fascism than the right does. It's all good. Read more
Published on Aug. 6 2009 by Winston
5.0 out of 5 stars Alternate Title: How to De-Program a Liberal Arts Graduate
I suspect that the ivory tower elites will despise this book. University acadamia and the media always equate conservative governments such as the USA under Dubya and Canada under... Read more
Published on March 20 2008 by GRH "Ex WHA Jet"
4.0 out of 5 stars Scholarly and Challenging
I suspect the two intensely negative reviews (just how many books of this type are truly one-star awful? Read more
Published on Jan. 21 2008 by Neil Ronan C.
1.0 out of 5 stars Sleight-of-hand for the the terminally gullible
Written as if it were a high school term paper, this tome yields no new ground. It is simply another Rovian attempt to identify what is worst about a movement (authoritarian... Read more
Published on Jan. 17 2008 by James R. Parrett
5.0 out of 5 stars Response to Mr. Billard.
As the Book Description notes, the word "Nazi" derives from "National Socialism" (German: Nationalsozialismus). Read more
Published on Jan. 16 2008 by Parity
5.0 out of 5 stars A surprisingly subtle review of collectivism
This is a surprisingly subtle and carefully researched account of "collectivism" in European and American political thought over the last hundred years. Read more
Published on Jan. 16 2008 by physics student
1.0 out of 5 stars Mindless Garbage
Has the Neo-con right completely lost their senses. The propagandist literature that now represents the far right in America has gone into Orwellian newspeak. Read more
Published on Jan. 12 2008 by Brian Sofer
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Look for similar items by category