Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control [Hardcover]

This book is simply brilliant.

Jones has a strong, clear style and is in complete control of his subject matter. He has thought through what so many others have only hinted at. He is a Catholic Nietzsche - he philosophizes with a hammer; and how much more sane and deliberate than Nietzsche himself.

This is a revolutionary book. It exposes the horror lurking beneath the make-up caked suface of the modern world. It deserves as wide a reading as possible.

The thesis of E. Michael Jones's "Libido Dominandi" is that, far from really liberating anyone, "sexual liberation" has served to deliver powerful means of social and political manipulation and control into the hands of our ruling élite. He marshals some impressive evidence. Here we read about Edward Bernays, Sigmund Freud's nephew and the founding father of the public relations industry, who was among the first to realize how sexual imagery could be employed in advertising. Long before the infamous "Virginia Slims" ad campaign, Bernays used the suggestion that cigarette smoking was an act of feminist independence to sell Lucky Strikes to women. Here we see the origins of the Planned Parenthood organization in the hope that birth control and abortion would reduce the numbers of the poor (especially ethnic Catholics and blacks), and resolve the dilemma of the welfare state. Here we learn of the fraudulent methodology of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, the sordid character of much of his "research," and the way in which Kinsey manipulated his academic superiors and his chief sources of funding through an implicit threat of blackmail, because these people had been foolish enough to give him their "sexual histories." The rÃ'le of the Rockefeller Foundation in both the Planned Parenthood and Kinsey enterprises was motivated by the obsaession of John D. Rockefeller III with eugenics, the pseudo-science of "race improvement." We learn also of the profound antipathy of the eugenicists and sex researchers towards Roman Catholicism, which they viewed as their principal adversary. Jones exposes the origins of "Americans United for the Separation of Church and State" in the anti-Catholic bigotry of Paul Blanshard. The organizations described here present a façade of respectability to the public that would not be so easy for them to maintain if their backgrounds were better publicized.

Jones's case would be more persuasive had this book come under a firmer editorial hand. It is lengthy, but also repetitive. Some material is duplicated almost verbatim in several parts of the book; also, Jones repeats, again almost verbatim, material from his other books, "Dionysos Rising," "Decadent Moderns," and "Monsters from the Id." This book might have been cut to half its length with as good or better effect than it now has. The work also fails in its efforts to tie the all-too-genuine mischief wrought by the sexual revolution together as the result of some sort of "Illuminist" conspiracy. Jones is a Roman Catholic polemicist of the old-fashioned type, for whom no Roman prelate (at least before Vatican II) ever did wrong, and no Protestant ever did right. He writes with the vehemence of a pamphleteer in the time of the sixteenth-century French wars of religion, and would probably have been perfectly happy under the patronage of the third duke of Guise. While many conservative Catholics, his intended audience, will be undisturbed by this tone, it is likely to put off many others who might otherwise be interested in Jones's factual reportage and sympathetic to his conclusions. This is unfortunate, since both deserve to be more widely known.

Michael E. Jones, publisher of the right or left or centre or up and down and, oh, possibly even diagonal journal Culture Wars, publishes this Summa of the summum malum perennially confused these days with the summum bonum.

If saying that almost an entire order of nuns was destroyed, as they were, due to the activities of a psychologist utilising them as an experiment, as they were; a psychologist who may even have been outrightly anti-catholic, which he probably was; if all that is a conspiracy then it's one of true ones; live with it, they do crop up from time to time. Anyhow, it gives Jones' book some _eclat_, as otherwise it would be rather heavy going. This is due to the fact that, unlike, say, Willis in Structures of Deceit, it doesn't rely on the idiocy of the reader, on knowing that he or she would know nothing of the history of the Church and even then, if they did, only secondary sources in English - you can always trust the Americans and English to be only able to speak one language - Jones at least argues with some assumption that the reader might wish for more than a paranoid screed ( Willis again!), which has the added benefit, apart form its honesty, of giving the reader something to argue against and intelligently reject.

Meaning, of course, that Jones should not be thought 'right'. Or that his argument is faultness, and ought to be simply accepted or, even more simplistically, rejected. It isn't faultless. Possibly not as a whole and certainly as regards details; his consuming interest in secret societies for example. One would have many points to halt him on and ask him to justify himself. As one can say this of almost any book, this can hardly be called a criticism.

A truly 'worthwhile' book....

CGH