| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
It is very accurate,
By DS Shervin (New York, NY) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Past Lives Future Healing (Hardcover)
This is a good book. The author obviously has experienced Samadhi. Another good book is 'Autobiography of a Yogi', by Pramahansa Yoganananda.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
very very good!,
By Mike (usa) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Past Lives, Future Healing (Paperback)
This is my favorite Sylvia Browne book. Its well written and very fascinating. What the people that gave Sylvia a bad review for this book forgot to mention that she has proven literatley thousands of her case studies. Like if a patient claimed to be named whatever and lived in say Boston and and had whatever occupation. She would go and look into public records and find that person, proving they existed. And they also forgot to mention that she is a master hypnotherapist. And how would you guys explain all those people Sylvia cured that were practically incurable?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Don't listen to reviews re historically incorrect facts,
By Not Pleased "cookymonster" (SF, CA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Past Lives, Future Healing: A Psychic Reveals the Secrets to Good Health and Great Relationships (Audio CD)
To the people who insist her book is historically incorrect, how do you know that NO ONE was burned in Salem? I mean, NO ONE??? Not one person, at all? Is there proof? It only takes one case to prove this wrong, and to assume that no one, absolutely without a doubt that no one, was burned in Salem is far-fetched. Just because the statement was printed in a history book does not mean it is fact - true for most cases, yes, but not 100% right. Anyone who has taken a math class on this type of theory, making an over-reaching assumption such as this, better have some damn good proof to back it up. That being said, her book is great and very thought-provoking. Please don't be deterred by skeptics grabbing at such a stupid reason to criticize her book, due to a supposed historical fallacy that is very questionable.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
|
Most recent customer reviews |
|