Lives of the Novelists: A History of Fiction in 294 Lives and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Lives of the Novelists: A History of Fiction in 294 Lives on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Lives of the Novelists: A History of Fiction in 294 Lives [Hardcover]

John Sutherland

List Price: CDN$ 48.29
Price: CDN$ 31.02 & FREE Shipping. Details
You Save: CDN$ 17.27 (36%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Wednesday, October 1? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition CDN $25.05  
Hardcover CDN $31.02  
Join Amazon Student in Canada


Book Description

March 5 2012

No previous author has attempted a book such as this: a complete history of novels written in the English language, from the genre's seventeenth-century origins to the present day. In the spirit of Dr. Johnson’s Lives of the Poets, acclaimed critic and scholar John Sutherland selects 294 writers whose works illustrate the best of every kind of fiction—from gothic, penny dreadful, and pornography to fantasy, romance, and high literature. Each author was chosen, Professor Sutherland explains, because his or her books are well worth reading and are likely to remain so for at least another century. Sutherland presents these authors in chronological order, in each case deftly combining a lively and informative biographical sketch with an opinionated assessment of the writer's work. Taken together, these novelists provide both a history of the novel and a guide to its rich variety. Always entertaining, and sometimes shocking, Sutherland considers writers as diverse as Daniel Defoe, Henry James, James Joyce, Edgar Allan Poe, Virginia Woolf, Michael Crichton, Jeffrey Archer, and Jacqueline Susann.

Written for all lovers of fiction, Lives of the Novelists succeeds both as introduction and re-introduction, as Sutherland presents favorite and familiar novelists in new ways and transforms the less favored and less familiar through his relentlessly fascinating readings.


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Product Description

Review

"A worthy successor to Dr. Johnson’s Lives of the Poets: John Sutherland is witty, incisive, idiosyncratic, and has the keenest of eyes for the telling detail. While recounting the stories of so many fascinating authors, Lives of the Novelists also offers a memorable portrait of a critical life devoted to reading and writing."—James Shapiro, Professor of English, Columbia University (James Shapiro Columbia University)

"John Sutherland is among the handful of critics whose every book I must have. He’s sharp-eyed and sharp-tongued, with a generous heart and a wise head. This self-assured and knowledgeable survey of novels in English is invaluable as both a reference work and, wonderfully, a book to savor."—Jay Parini (Jay Parini)

“An engaging book. . . erudite and entertaining, informative and provoking.”—Allan Massie, Wall Street Journal
(Allan Massie Wall Street Journal)

“Tremendously exhilarating . . . you can read Sutherland for fun as well as for (cultural) profit. . . . Lives of the Novelists might look like an academic tome, but it reads like one of those unputdownable blockbusters you take to the beach.”—Michael Dirda, Washington Post
(Michael Dirda Washington Post)

"This is one of the most delightful books of its kind I know. . . . there is so much acute intelligence, wit and wisdom in this epic shlep
through biographical vaudeville that scandal and outrage sit cheek by jowl with Freudian resonance and Johnsonian acuteness. . . . I think old Sam Johnson would be pleased that one of his descendants had written a reference book as engaging, shrewd, witty and irresistible to contemporary tastes as this one.”—Jeff Simon, Buffalo News
(Jeff Simon Buffalo News)

“Sutherland's writing is just plain delightful . . . [and] the body of knowledge this book reflects is astounding. . . . It tells the story of the people who've told our culture's stories, high and low and otherwise, for 2-1/2 centuries.”—Carolyn Kellogg, Los Angeles Times
(Carolyn Kellogg Los Angeles Times)

“Engaging”—Magan Szwarek, Booklist
(Magan Szwarek Booklist)

"A tremendously exhilarating book . . . less a work of scholarship than it is a catalogue of pleasures . . . By its heft, Lives of the Novelists might look like an academic tome, but it reads like one of those unputdownable blockbusters you take to the beach."—Michael Dirda, Washington Post
(Michael Dirda Washington Post)

“Sutherland excels with his unexpected inclusions. . . . consider passing copies along to friends who are readers . . . we’ve been offered a starting point for many hours of literary discussions.”—John McIntyre, Daily Beast
(John McIntyre Daily Beast)

“This chatty, companionable, undogmatic tome . . . leaves one with the happy feeling that there are no human activities more worthwhile than writing and reading novels.”—New Yorker
(New Yorker)

“This is a fabulous book—it's impossible to stop at just one biography.”—Marilyn Dahl, Shelf Awareness
(Marilyn Dahl Shelf Awareness)

“Fleet-footed . . . bighearted . . . [Sutherland] revels in the short take, the darting, sonnet-like in-and-out, the lightning shifts and the abrupt and fitting close.”—Christopher Benfey, New York Times Book Review
(Christopher Benfey New York Times Book Review)

"This is one of those books you can open to any page and start reading. . . . His publisher calls it 'opinionated,' and I call it a reference book that rocks."—Florence King, National Review
(Florence King National Review)

“Sutherland’s book is at once far more entertaining, more informative, and more personal than the standard product. Everything in Sutherland comes with an edge.”—John Wilson, Commonweal
(John Wilson Commonweal)

“Nibble at this large volume randomly, or gobble it up from beginning to end, and either way you'll come upon nuggets of wry humor. The tone is entertaining throughout [and] rich with anecdotes . . . and there's nary a wasted word.”—Susan K. Perry, Psychology Today
(Susan K. Perry Psychology Today)

“Frequently observant, occasionally infuriating, consistently arresting”—Benjamin Schwarz, Atlantic
(Benjamin Schwarz The Atlantic)

About the Author

John Sutherland is Emeritus Lord Northcliffe Professor of Modern English Literature at University College London and a former long-time faculty member at the California Institute of Technology. He is author of over 20 books, editor of 30 more, and a regular columnist and critic on radio and television. He lives in London.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 3.6 out of 5 stars  14 reviews
20 of 21 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Rife With Errors May 26 2012
By Corey - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Kindle Edition
Factual errors in nonfiction call into question the authority of a work. I checked this book out from my local library hoping to gain insight about favorite novelists and to discover authors unknown to me. A colleague who thumbed through the book for a few minutes discovered an error in the Margaret Atwood entry: she did not win the Booker Prize for Alias Grace. When I began to read the book in earnest, I found many other errors. I couldn't believe how easy they were to find, and was glad I didn't buy this book. Apparently, I'm not alone in my discovery. Reviewing the book for The Wall Street Journal, Allan Massie writes, "In the acknowledgments, Mr. Sutherland notes the 'support, encouragement, assistance and (all too often) corrections' of four editors and adds that 'the mistakes which remain are, alas, all mine.' There are a good many of them. I spotted 50 before I stopped counting--four in the entry on Norman Douglas alone...." Part of the joy of reading a work like this is talking with friends about interesting facts I learned. But after spotting dozens of errors, and with imperfect knowledge myself, how can I trust what the author is telling me?
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Endlessly fascinating! April 27 2012
By Best Condition Books - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
It's an 800-page collection of 294 short biographies, 2 and 3 pages each on average, of as eclectic a bunch of authors as you'll ever encounter, many of whom I'm sure modern readers have never even
heard of or know little or nothing about, such as Aphra Benn, Olaudah Equiano, James Hogg, Harrison Ainsworth, Sylvanus Cobb Jr., Richard Aldington,to name a handful.
Along with those, you'll also find a host of people you have heard of, both those considered highly literary, like J. D. Salinger and D. H. Lawrence and John Steinbeck and Evelyn Waugh, and those considered to be beneath serious critical notice, such as Zane Grey and Edgar Rice Burroughs and Sax Rohmer and Robert Jordan and
Stephen King and Jacqueline Susann, from whose entry one learns the reason for her most famous title and where the actual Valley was --- and it's not in California, folks.
The book is full of jewels of information: Isaac Asimov died of AIDS, which was only admitted 10 years after his death; Richard Pryor, the comedian, acknowledged Mark Twain as his inspiration, a connection I'd never have made; Dennis Wheatley referred to his diary as his `fornicator's game book'; Patricia Cornwell's Kay Scarpetta was originally a male named Joe Constable --- I could go on and on: the book is endlessly fascinating.
That one man could have this much knowledge about so many so varied writers is mind-boggling!
There is one error I've noticed: contrary to the opening sentence in his entry, Robert E. Howard DID write a novel.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Not the novelist in your life, but the life in your novelist April 18 2013
By Phillip Kay - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
I've just finished reading an enormous work over 1,000 pages, Lives of the Novelists: a history of fiction in 294 lives, short biographies of novelists writing in English by John Sutherland (Profile Books London 2011). It presents a novel idea (excuse the pun), embodying both literary and social history in English from John Bunyan in 1660 to Rana Dasgupta in 2010. It charts literary fashions, examines the best sellers and the classics of past and present years and gives an idea of how the novel has changed over the years while its function has remained, after all, very much the same. It's clearly not an encyclopaedia (not comprehensive enough) nor a history of fiction, even fiction in English (for the same reason) but a snapshot or series of snapshots (of many possible ones) of the way fiction has developed over the years.

My personal response to the novelists selected for inclusion in the book may be typical of many readers. The great bulk of them I had heard of and was indifferent to, about 130 of the entries. These included celebrated names, and others obviously important to Sutherland himself. A whopping 100 names I had never heard off, and I consider myself well read. This is mainly, I think, because Sutherland seems to be a specialist in 19th century best selling novelists. Nothing has such a short shelf life as a best seller, or tells as much about the times it was one. Of the 294 novelists Sutherland writes about, there were only 40 writers I liked, and 20 I strongly disliked. Despite this, I found the book fascinating. It helped get through so many pages that Sutherland concentrates on life and times material, seldom stopping for literary criticism. He delights to pass on details about subjects' sexual preferences, and the number of writers he mentions who are homosexual is surely higher than average. Here you can find out the names of the many famous women that Daphne du Maurier had sex with for example. It was this mix of personal anecdotes about writers, and social history, that made the book so readable for me.

Sutherland apologises for his selection in his preface, and calls it 'idiosyncratic'. He has no need to do so. I read somewhere recently that every year in Britain about 5,000 novels are published. Even though 4,999 probably fall still born from the press, the numbers mount up over time, and no-one writing on the novel can now be comprehensive. If the spread of internet enabled epublishing continues, there could soon be 500,000 novelists a year, and eventually as many writers as readers, a fact that might lead to the decline, not enhancement, of reading as an activity. Who knows? So diversion of this stream to genre publishing and reading is bound to increase. This means much of the output will be directed at audiences only interested in specific genres or even sub-genres, and who will ignore the rest. One such genre, though the literary mandarins and the educators don't like to admit it, is literary fiction, once called 'good' literature, produced in conformity to dictates of taste and forming, hopefully, part of a tradition and a canon. Literary historians, and I am supposing Sutherland is one, straddle an uncomfortable position, taking note of worthwhile fiction in the tradition but also acknowledging the existence of best sellers totally oblivious of such traditions. Genre readers, in the meantime, can tell you all about Robert Howard and his Conan stories, and argue endlessly about the merits of his 'continuators', and are often oblivious of the existence of books such as Ulysses. We are slowly realising that nobody need be ashamed or dismissive of this. So I understand that Sutherland has left out Joseph Heller and Catch 22, John Gardner and Nickel Mountain, Vikram Seth and A Suitable Boy, Vikram Chandra and Funeral Games, the work of Angela Carter, and underplays the significance of George Orwell. These would be part of my own 'idiosyncratic' selection. But after all, no-one's perfect.

Sutherland quotes Jacques Bonnet in his prologue: "Authors are just fictional people [of whom we know] never enough to make them truly real". I think this is significant. Entering the world of fiction should confront us with the fact that the novelist is just as much a creation, by himself and his critics and readers, as his fiction. So is a history of fiction (fiction is a lie that strives to tell the truth). Sutherland closes his preface with this admission: "It will be easy to see why most of those writers who did get in got in [the book]. What they have in common is that they are all novelists who have meant something to me, or who have come my way over a long reading career and stayed with me, for whatever reason". The next step to comprehensiveness would be an encyclopaedia, and they are usually not as readable as this book.

The bulk of the book concerns modern literature of the 20th and 21st centuries, over 170 authors: 19th century writers have 100 entries, and those working earlier a mere 25. So there are no revelations here about the history of the novel. The vast number of women writers of the time of Henry Fielding (including his sister Sarah) are mentioned as exhaustively as Ian Watt does in his 1957 book The Rise of the Novel (though that was a study of Defoe, Fielding and Richardson). I mean not at all. It is no surprise to see entries for Defoe, Richardson, Fielding and Sterne, but good to see an entry for the fascinating Aphra Behn and her confusing mix of autobiography and fiction (Aphra is of course also famous as a founder of the 18th century British drama). One can only shake one's head over the entry of John Cleland, a sub de Sade writer writing to escape debt and with no serious social purpose as de Sade had (but he is entertaining to hear of). And pornography, or at least written pornography, is as hard to write without being ludicrous, in the 18th century as it has been ever since.

It is at the end of the 18th century entries that Sutherland starts to surprise. There is an entry for Robert Bage. Who is Robert Bage? An industrialist who came upon hard times, influenced by ideas that resulted in the French Revolution, and, like Walter Scott, wrote himself out of financial difficulties. His novels, though he began with little literary skill, reflected the progressive ideas of the time and were very popular. Around 1800 anybody you mentioned Robert Bage to in England would have known whom you were talking about.

Another once famous name was Mrs Catherine Gore, the mother of 10 children who survived more than one period of abject poverty, was defrauded of her fortune, lost her husband, went blind, yet was very wealthy indeed when she died. Her secret? Her ability to write as many as two novels a week, her speciality being lurid accounts of the 'lower upper classes' (the British class system is complex - the group Mrs Gore wrote about were not aristocrats but tolerated by them as acquaintances). All very shades of Mills and Boon and similar production houses, yet admirable in a horrible kind of way. I try not to think of all those lower middle class wives devouring Mrs Gore's books, satisfied to think the better off were no better than they should be.

Other female writers follow such as "`Fanny Fern' ... a bestselling novelist, serial wife and newspaper columnist (some accounts say the first columnist in the country [USA], others merely the highest paid)". The enormous contribution 19th century female novelists made to feminism by, first of all, existing, often precariously; highlighting the fact there was a huge female audience for novels; and expressing the wants and concerns of females, in a time when males were oblivious to all these situations, should always be recognised. They are usually left out of literary histories on the grounds they aren't very good. Yet histories of the novel always leave in Harold Robbins and Mickey Spillane, who weren't very good either, possibly to a greater extent than female novelists usually ignored, though grossing as highly in their day. Sutherland covers about 80 female authors in his book.

Something I liked was the exploration Sutherland gives to end of the century novelists, a period with a feverish kind of dated progressiveness, a kind of fussy permissiveness (a bit like the 1960s in a way). I learned about Ouida, Ambrose Bierce, Bram Stoker, Mrs Humphrey Ward, Marie Corelli, and favourite authors Arthur Conan Doyle and Kenneth Grahame. The best seller greats are mentioned, HG Wells, Somerset Maugham and Theodore Dreiser, and the best sellers (but not so great) like Edgar Wallace, Edgar Rice Burroughs and Zane Grey. And the scandalous life of Norman Douglas and the inspiring one of Erskine Childers. My love of detective stories made the entries on Grant Allen, Agatha Christie, Sax Rohmer, Raymond Chandler, Earle Stanley Gardner and Dashiell Hammett enjoyable to read.

Sutherland's book errs on the side of comprehensiveness when it comes to the (unstated) 'English' criteria. Novelists from England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales, North America and Australia, even New Zealand, are included, but also novelists who wrote in English at some stage. Naturally, Vladimir Nabokov and Joseph Conrad, but also Olaudah Equiano from Nigeria, Pearl S Buck from China, Cabrera Infante from Cuba, VS Naipaul from Trinidad, Chinua Achebe from Nigeria and Rana Dasgupta, born in England to Indian parents, living now in India, first published in Australia, a symbol of the indefiniteness national and cultural boundaries can have (do I have to add, in the modern world?). As an Australian I was glad to see two Australian authors included, sad that they were the brilliant, unreadable genius Patrick White and the stogy, unreadable Peter Carey, an advertising man who always reserves the film rights. Could have been Henry Handel Richardson, George Johnston, Christina Stead or David Malouf. And if Edgar Allen Poe and Katherine Mansfield were included, why not Henry Lawson or Charmian Clift? Guess you really can't fit everyone in.

Probably the most valuable section of the book is the largest, on 20th and 21st century writers. Writers of the past are well documented. Best sellers of the past not so well, but Sutherland's book remedies this lack quite well too. Modern writers, however, are rarely seen in context, as authors. They are usually seen as product, and you are urged to buy their book, the greatest story ever told, with dozens of unknowns telling you so on the book jacket. Sutherland juxtaposes Salman Rushdie and Patricia Cornwell, Ian McEwen and Michael Crichton, Julian Barnes and Jeffrey Archer, and slowly you get an idea these are all engaged in the one process, and that all of this diverse material is read, by a enormous public with a voracious appetite for reading matter. Perhaps we all read for different reasons, but we all exercise our minds the same way, decoding symbols at a greater than light speed and recreating the words through our imaginations. Quite strenuous really, and unique among human occupations.

One is left with thoughts on the very different readers authors write for, and the very different writers the public read for. The psychopaths who read Mickey Spillane's zestful descriptions of someone hammering a human skull to fragments with a pistol while dodging the spurting blood and brains (lots of these as he's still the best selling crime author). The history posing as fiction of George MacDonald Fraser or the fiction posing as history of Georgette Heyer. The way some writers can explore their times while writing genre stories, like Chester Himes, while others resolutely exploit those genres, like Stephen King. The marketers and hustlers who always negotiate the movie rights like Jacqueline Susann and the painstaking slow writers who write what they must like John Kennedy Toole. People who seem accidentally to become best sellers like William Golding or John Fowles, others who mine genres, creatively like Raymond Chandler, or exhaustively and ultimately in a sterile way like Chandler's friend Earle Stanley Gardner.

For those who want more, Sutherland includes a reference to a full length biography when there is one, and suggests a key work for each author. Only the obsessive will want more of most of the writers Sutherland mentions, and the worthwhile ones will already have their fans, but his book is a useful look outside genres for most readers. Through it we can explore what the snobs are reading, the crass taste of the plebs, the sometimes strange story of the superannuated best seller. It's a good way to see the novel in English. And I bet Sutherland hasn't reserved the movie rights (make a nice little maxi series on TV). Myself, I'm looking forward to Lives of the Novelists II, in which Sutherland will include the lives of the 294 novelists inexplicably left out of the first volume. Bound to be more entertaining than reading the authors themselves.
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Fun, fun, fun May 27 2012
By Michael A. Willhoite - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
Even though some readers find errors in this book, it's still highly entertaining. Reading a book like this on Kindle is the only way to go, as the original hardcover would be hard to carry everywhere you'll want to read it. Sutherland also produced The Stanford Companion to Victorian Fiction, which is one of the last books I'd ever get rid of. It has led me to any number of unknown masterpieces. I'm a huge admirer of the Victorian novel, and Sutherland makes a wonderful Virgil to my Dante. In the new book he goes into even juicier detail.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars 294 Depressed Alcoholic Party Guys May 20 2013
By James W. Fonseca - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
The author makes no bones that these are his personal selections, but with 294 lives, each summarized in a 2-5 page mini-bio, pretty much everyone is here if you sat down and made a list of the top 100 you would expect to see. All the classic British and American authors are here, and some outstanding international authors Chinua Achebe, for example). Recent works focus on folks from the British Isles, especially Booker Prize winners: Amis Jr and Senior, Ian McEwan, Julian Barnes, Each bio begins with a quote from the author, from one of his/her characters, or about the author by a colleague. Usually these quotes have a bite to them: Examples: "His reputation grew with each book he failed to publish." (Jay McInerney on Harold Brodkey) "There's no art in what I do." (Alistair MacLean). "Too much." (The TLS review of Mailer's The Naked and the Dead.) "I'm only black because you think you're white." (James Baldwin)

So we have all the pithy quotes and classics with a lot of Brits, but we also have all the best sellers in all the genres, and not just mystery and sci fi, but westerns and pulp, and in general, a lot of folks spurned by the establishment who laughed all the way to the bank. One hit wonders are here: Margaret Mitchell for Gone With the Wind, Malcom Lowry for Under the Volcano, and Jacqueline Susann for Valley of the Dolls. Each author is identified by his major biographers (web sites for very contemporary folks) and a listing of the author's Most Read Work.

The book is immensely entertaining because it's clear that Sutherland has picked some of his non-top-100 selections, the lesser-knowns, simply for the scandal and salaciousness they can offer. Benjamim Schwarz titled his review of this work in The Atlantic, "Sex Lives of Novelists." Writers have never been known for discretion in their private lives, but what a horny alcoholic, drug-addicted, depressive, divorcing, child-ignoring, spouse-abusing lot they are! Other than John Updike, religious and a family man, alcohol, drugs and abuse are only a start. You add some interest with lesbian/gay or bi. But the 3, 4 and 5 star folks are victims of abuse, abusers themselves or dying of alcohol and/or drugs. Sons of British authors who threw themselves under trains could form a small club. Four and five spouses aren't unusual. This book is fun and fascinating. I do caution that other reviewers have noted numerous factual errors. Allan Massie, in a review in the WSJ, wrote that he stopped counting errors at 50 and found four in one author's biography. But it's a fun read.

Look for similar items by category


Feedback