| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
17 of 17 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Fascinating Look at the Early Forms of Christianity,
By FaithfulReader.com (New York, New York) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew (Hardcover)
Those who decry the fragmentation of contemporary Christianity into so many denominations and sects would do well to take notice of Bart Ehrman's carefully chosen title --- LOST CHRISTIANITIES, plural. As much as we'd like to believe that early Christians worshiped in unity and held to a unified doctrinal viewpoint, historical evidence indicates otherwise. The faith of the followers of Christ in the first three centuries took such diverse paths that even those denominations that seem to be polar opposites today have far more in common than some of the Christian sects that flourished in the early years of the church.Due in part to the rapid and widespread growth of Christianity but without a corresponding improvement in communication, local churches were at the mercy of a host of influences and a diversity of beliefs about God, Jesus, and the interpretation of apostolic teaching. Numerous writings, most of which were later omitted from the New Testament canon, were considered authentic and true representations of the teachings of Christ. That diversity of belief gave rise to sects like the anti-Jewish Marcionites, who dismissed the Old Testament as irrelevant, loved the writings of Paul, and believed Jesus did not have a flesh-and-blood body; the Ebionites, who considered Paul a heretic and believed Jesus was born of the (...) union of Joseph and Mary, later to be "adopted" by God as His son to fulfill His mission; and the Phibionites, who allegedly engaged in orgiastic and cannibalistic activities, though the accounts of those activities are highly suspect. Those are just three examples of the numerous sects that flourished at the time, all of which Ehrman examines in fascinating detail. Ehrman, of course, also gives plenty of ink to the non-canonical writings, many of them a part of the now well-known collection of Gnostic literature. Because the canon had not been established, these writings were widely read and circulated and considered by many Christians to be just as authoritative as the books we now have in the New Testament. That created a fair amount of conflict when the bishops of the church began meeting in the fourth century to try to sort out all the divergent views and to separate the "correct" writings from the obvious and not-so-obvious forgeries as well as the writings that were authentic but expressed views that the bishops considered unorthodox. There are plenty of other books on the market now that offer a glimpse into the somewhat complicated world of early Christianity. But what sets LOST CHRISTIANITIES apart is Ehrman's ability to convey such an abundance of historical information in such an enjoyable way. As an academic --- Ehrman is the chair of the religious studies department at the Chapel Hill campus of the University of North Carolina --- he provides a thorough overview of what it meant to be Christian in the three centuries immediately following the resurrection without ever lapsing into a dry, scholarly (also known as "boring") mode. Throughout, he speculates on a series of "What if?" questions ("What if the Marcionites had had their way?" and the like), eventually drawing the conclusion that had one of the more peculiar expressions of Christian faith become the dominant one, Christianity itself would be little more than a footnote in today's history books. Some believers may have their most cherished notions about the early church rocked to the core, but in reality there's nothing here that should threaten anyone's faith. If you're looking for a single book that pulls together an enormous amount of information on the early years of Christianity and presents it in a highly readable and entertaining way, you'd be hard-pressed to find a book that surpasses LOST CHRISTIANITIES. --- Reviewed by Marcia Ford
15 of 15 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
I expected more meat,
By Devon Gillard (Alberta, Canada) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew (Hardcover)
My thoughts on this book are mixed. It includes many excellent and balanced presentations of his topic, such as "Morton Smith and the Secret Gospel of Mark" or "The Story of Thecla". Indeed, much of the book is illuminating and very well presented. That being said, again and again after reading some statement I found astonishingly bold I turned to the footnotes in search of further evidence only to find a reference to another Ehrman book. This became somewhat maddening! Worse, in his discussions about Luke 3:22 (Pg 102 and 222 ) where he twice asserts that the "oldest witness to Luke's Gospel" reads that Jesus was "begotten" at his baptism, he provides no footnote at all. The difference is extremely interesting and monumentally important to theology. What, then, is this "oldest witness"? I checked some reference Bibles and found the "begotten" version was supported by a late 5th century manuscript (D) and some Latin versions. The reading present in our Bibles is supported by all the rest of the early manuscripts. I could not find a single quote from an Apostolic Father in support of the "begotten" version. Phillip W Comfort states that the "second reading (begotten) is a manifest corruption, probably evolving from the Adoptionist Heresy". So, I am left wondering what this ancient witness is, why it outweighs the rest of the evidence, and how this suggests a proto-orthodox corruption instead of an Adoptionist corruption!?! In discussing the variant readings of Mark 15:34 Erhman asserts the changes were made because of Gnostic interpretations. He excludes from his consideration the debates among the proto-orthodox themselves over just how Jesus is theos ((G)god) and what his relationship with the Father is and how this text impacts that discussion. In fact, Erhman seems to adopt, in this book, a rather simplistic view of how Christ was understood to be theos by the proto-orthodox (pg 223, cf. Hurtado). This is no small oversight in a book which purports to delineate the arguments, texts, and corruptions made by various groups on just such issues. His discussion of John 1:18 (pg 223) is rather weak. At issue, it seems to me, was not some proto-orthodox zeal to see the Word called "only God" rather than "only Son", but rather, scribal discomfort with the title "only-begotten God". He does not even reveal the theologically loaded term "begotten" in this text. I'm not saying Ehrman is wrong in any of these cases. I'm merely faulty the book for making assertions without providing the reader sufficient (or any) evidence. I have ordered two more Ehrman books to try to find answers to these and other questions. I will say that I am, at the moment, tentatively suspicious of all his assertions since the few I am able to check in my meager library were found wanting.
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
No Anti-Conservative Agenda, Only Balanced Scholarship,
By
This review is from: Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew (Hardcover)
Ehrman condenses the insights of critical scholarship in a very readable and lively book. I won't here repeat what others have said in their reviews, but will say this much.For those with a more conservative background, Ehrman may have a reputation of being antagonistic towards the faith. Ehrman certainly may not have the conception of the early church that many conservatives do, but the charge of a liberally biased scholarship should not be laid at this scholar's door. There are a number of times where Ehrman has the opportunity to adopt a radically liberal position, but chooses not to on the basis of evidence, etc. There is the impression that he simply wants the reader to understand the diversity and sloppiness of the history of early Christianity, not undercut a person's faith. One of the things I like especially about this book, and Ehrman's methodology in general, is his willingness to ask the "What if...?" questions. "What if the history of the early church was eventually dominated by the Ebionites, Gnostics, etc.?" These are important questions to ask, simply because they usually turn up answers (or even other questions) that assist one thinking outside the box. Simply put: Evangelicals and other conservatives need not fear the contents of this book, but would benefit greatly (as everyone else) by being challenged with evidence of the enormous diversity of the early Christian movement(s). I find no evidence whatsoever of a "liberal" agenda. Rather, judicious and penetrating scholarship lies behind this very readable and introductory text, which will help only to underscore the necessary element of faith in one's existential encounter of Christ, instead of the uncertainties of historical evidence.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
|
Most recent customer reviews |
|