- Format: NTSC
- Number of tapes: 1
- MPAA Rating:
- Studio: MGM (Warner)
- VHS Release Date: Nov 1 2001
- Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
- ASIN: 6302265789
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #21,353 in Video (See Top 100 in Video)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Product Details |
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars
Lost in a daze,
By
This review is from: Lost in a Harem (VHS Tape)
Not one of Abbott & Costello's best works. Costello has some funny bits but overall I was rather unimpressed with this one. Don't get me wrong the movie is definitly watchable and has some very funny scenes but it just doesn't compare to some of the other work they put out around this same time. There are much better works to choose from "Time Of Their Lives", "Hold That Ghost" & "Rio Rita" to name a few.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Comedy,
By
This review is from: Lost in a Harem (VHS Tape)
If yo like Abbott and Costello, this is your movie. Overlooked by many, it is funnier than Buck Privates with many of the great A&C routines used to great advantage. A truly memorable comic masterpiece.
2.0 out of 5 stars
good start//then its downhill,
By robert (new jersey) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Lost in a Harem (VHS Tape)
after costello's illness mgm and universal rushed 2 films into production...this one is not their best....they seem to be disinterested//slow moving//one or 2 good routines//not their best
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
|
Most recent customer reviews |
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
