Most helpful customer reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Heir of Doris Anderson, May 13 2012
Way back in the late 1960s, when I was a kid, I read Doris Anderson's courageous articles on mental illness in my mom's Chatelaine magazine. Ms. Anderson, the editor of Chatelaine and one of Canada's top journalists, checked herself into a mental hospital and wrote about her harrowing experience there. She also wrote about the gold standard of mental heath care, the system of asylums set up by the Quakers in the 18th century, a treatment that emphasized rest, good food, music, books, and gardening. The majority of patients in this setting got better. Kindness cures madness better than any drug. Robert Whitaker is the heir of Doris Anderson, investigating the history of America's treatment of its most mentally ill. He details the changing attitude towards mental illness, and the disaster wrought by the eugenics movement, which originated in England, flourished in the United States, and came to what people thought was its horrific end with the Nazi regime. Note: the Nazis first gassed their mentally ill, in order to both clear their hospitals for wounded soldiers and do a test run on gas chambers. And, while the Final Solution was being carried out, there were psychiatrists in America who thought euthanasia was a humane solution to madness. There was a brief post-war respite of humane care in some asylums, and then the horror began again in America, with lobotomies, electroshock, and mind-destroying drugs. Thorazine, which was later marketed as a miracle pill, was first called a "chemical lobotomy." I bear witness that it's still used on some patients, to ill effect. Today someone on long-term antipsychotic medication can expect to die about 25 years too soon. Why do we permit our most vulnerable citizens to be treated like this, when there is so much evidence these drugs are destructive and that treatments involving less or no drugs offer better outcomes? We don't save money. The cost of mental illness continues to skyrocket, as more people take these expensive pills and end up on the disability rolls. According to Whitaker, we've been told "stories" by the pharmaceutical companies and those psychiatrists in cahoots with them. Greed, lies, bad science, cover-ups....
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
shocking expose of psychiatry, Dec 2 2003
This review is from: Mad in America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and the Enduring Mistreatment Of the Mentally Ill (Paperback)
Robert Whitaker has written a readable, well-documented, and disturbing book about the arrogant and sometimes monstrous behavior of American psychiatrists towards those they label as schizophrenic. He reveals that psychiatrists, desperate to show the biological basis of mental illness and thus establish their profession as a truly medical one, have since 1750 to the present distorted and covered up research, ignored risks, and abused helpless patients. Whitaker spends the first half of the book relating the earlier history of dehumanizing psychiatric treatments in gruesome detail. He starts with the 18th and 19th centuries, when patients were nearly drowned, spun in chairs to the point of collapse, or had their teeth or intestines removed. He continues through the first half of the 20th century, when the American eugenics movement motivated the sterilization of tens of thousands and inspired Hitler, neurologist Walter Freeman drove around the country with ice picks giving lobotomies through eye sockets, and shock therapies caused convulsions so severe that teeth, jaws, and even spines were often fractured. While the history of psychiatry, at least until 1950, is known to some, telling it lays the groundwork for Whitaker's thesis: that nothing has changed except the technology. The science it still bad, the treatment still abusive, the lying to the public and patients still egregious. Based in part on his own research, Whitaker documents the dark facts behind the past 50 years of treating patients with what are supposed to be antipsychotic medications- known in the profession as neuroleptics-from Thorazine to Clozaril and beyond. He makes the case that these drugs are often no more than chemical lobotomies. He debunks the myth that neuroleptics normalize brain chemistry, because no chemical imbalance is known to cause schizophrenia; instead they damage brain chemistry. While he acknowledges that some patients find them relieving, they cause many to feel like zombies or worse-these drugs were used by the Soviet Union to torture dissidents. They can exacerbate symptoms, make relapses more likely and more severe, and can trigger violence. They can cause a chronic psychiatric condition when recovery is otherwise possible, disabling and sometimes permanent neurological side effects, and death. In order to test pet theories, psychiatrists have experimented on unsuspecting and deliberately misled patients by making their psychoses much worse. Drug companies have conspired with doctors to cover up risks and incompetent research. The World Health Organization has shown that you stand a far better chance of recovering from schizophrenia in a developing country like Nigeria or India, where neuroleptics are rarely given, than in America or Europe. This book is a painful reminder that psychiatrists don't have a special handle on psychological problems, and their hubris can come at great cost to others.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Psychiatry needs to rebut this point for point, Mar 12 2004
This review is from: Mad in America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and the Enduring Mistreatment Of the Mentally Ill (Paperback)
I am surprised how many negative reviews claim that this book is sloppy, unscientific, romantic, biased. To these reviewers I say: let biopsychiatry rebut the allegations of this book point for point, and we'll see who is sloppy, romantic, unscientific, biased. Biopsychiatry has tons of money - the drug companies spend over 20 billion dollars a year on promotion. If they truly want to correct the "misinformation" in this book (and others, like David Healy's new book, Let them Eat Prozac), they have the money to try. If the books of Whitaker and others are as dangerous and misleading as biopsychiatry claims, one would think they'd be eager to rebut them fact for fact. But they do not. Professionals and the public need to demand an end to the evasion.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most recent customer reviews
|