4.0 out of 5 stars
She reminds me what I love most about reading!, July 18 2004
It's not that I thought I was the only one, but when people ask me why I have so many books that I haven't read, then I buy more, I answer, "I'm saving them." They scratch their heads in confusion, not understanding why I have so many books in the first place. They just don't get it. But, Sara gets it.
Sara Nelson has been an editor and a reporter who has a library the size of my room. She is also a voracious reader. She looks for books that fit her "mood." She wanders around her library in her nightgown knowing exactly where every book is. (Like I do.) She talks about how she wasn't always that way. She used to go to the "Multiplex" and go dancing.
"So when did my life change? Looking back, I can see the early warning signs of readaholism, like when my mother gave me Marjorie Morningstar when I was thirteen and I pulled an all-nighter reading--and weeping over--the Herman Wouk novel." (Mine was around the same time, but not as grown up. Judy Blume's "Are you there God, it's me Margaret?" Doomed to turn any outdoor loving girl into an indoor one.)
Basically, she decided to read a book a week, and write how she felt about it. Now, this is not a book full of lists (which to me, is not a fun book to read, but more to make notes from.) This is a book that takes what she reads and she connects it to personal experience. She read books about baseball when her son was interested in baseball. She read books about Japanese Americans during WWII (because her husband is.) It makes so much sense. When I was in a bad place in a past relationship, I bought relationship books. When I was single, I bought single girl empowerment books. Now that I just want to enjoy books, I buy literature and chick-lit. Sometimes, we want to read what we know, or what we are experiencing at the time.
She talks about books that are overhyped, ones that really are not that great, but people talk about how great they are, and everyone wants to read them. The book is like a celebrity: the more exposure it has, the more famous it gets, no matter how much talent is there.
She talked about how when you are an adult, it's ok to STOP reading if you aren't into it. (I recently received similar advice from another reviewer who said that her mom told her she should read to her age, and stop if you don't enjoy it.) Does that work with me? If the book is really bad, which doesn't happen that often, I have stopped. But, sometimes I trudge through, hoping it will get better. But, why waste your time with something you don't enjoy? Were we taught that we had to finish the whole thing, because in school, we read it whether we liked it or not? Maybe you can try it a few years later. I got to chapter 13 in Brave New World when I was in the 12th grade. I couldn't finish. I was done. I faked my tests, and somehow made it through. 10 years later, I tried it again, and finished it. Not only did I finish it, I enjoyed it.
Basically, there is a lot more to this book than "Read this, don't read that." She digs deeper, and inspires me to read some more! I hope that she writes about a 2nd year of passionate reading. I will be sure to pick it up.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2.0 out of 5 stars
Smarmy, July 9 2004
I had high hopes for this book. I saw it remaindered at an outlet store and picked it up. As I flipped through the book, it didn't really grab me like I thought it would. I was still interested so I checked it out at the library instead. I'm glad I saved the money and the space on my pine shelves. This book is cold and never really warms up. The writer seems to be intent on coming across as cool and clever and maybe attempting to write something that would meet some prior self-set criteria of arch style. It doesn't work. There's promise, flickers of it, but it doesn't work. It seems forced. I suspect her true writing nature is warmer, but that's not how she really wanted it to be. Her writing here is mostly self conscious and not real. It lacks honesty, like she's trying to avoid the same criticisms that those in the know, the so-called cultural elite, (which she includes herself) level against the lowly would-be artist who doesn't measure up to their standards. Maybe it's because she's too close to the world of publishing (perhaps a reason why this was even published??). I detect an anti-writer bias in the way that a lot of people start to despise those people whose existence their life work depends on, (professors to students, doctors to patients, coaches to athletes, and really everyone in any kind of service industry. Speaking of that, how could you read Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich in that year and not comment on it? That probably says it all right there.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No