1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
Not Impeccable, Sep 3 2003
By A Customer
This review is from: Ms. Mentor's Impeccable Advice for Women in Academia (Paperback)
Along with a group of tenured female colleagues, I take issue with MOST of the advice in this book--it's embedded with all manner of weird prejudice (fat people are better than thin people; men are always dangerous; Emily Toth is God). The book espouses feminism but violates the basic precepts of feminism--taking risks, being humane, celebrating self and others. Why does she so rarely answer questions constructively? A bunch of us suspect that she makes up the letters herself, by the way--which makes the answers even more ludicrous.
All in all, this book is a curiously defensive, gutless approach to surviving academic life--not creative or provocative or even useful in terms of practical advice.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Funny, well-intentioned, but not so useful..., April 9 2003
This review is from: Ms. Mentor's Impeccable Advice for Women in Academia (Paperback)
I am gearing up to start in a Ph.D. program in the Fall, so I picked up this book hoping for some of the "practical stuff nobody wants you to know about" regarding grad school, publishing, and conferences. The thing about this book, though, is that the title is misleading. It's "advice for women in academia", but most of the advice (with a few exceptions) has nothing to do with being a woman. It's useful advice (usually) for important problems, but mostly stuff I had heard from many other sources, not really "issues that women daren't discuss openly", as advertised. People mostly ask questions like "Should I publish before looking for a job?" and "People say cover letters should have a 'WOW' factor to attract attention. How do I do that?". Standard fare questions about academia.
For example... out of 16 questions in the chapters on job searching, grad school, and conferences, I found three that had anything to do with being a woman. The three questions were (paraphrased): 1) "What should I wear to work/class/conferences?" 2) "The director of grad studies puts the course catalogue on his lap during course scheduling meetings, which makes it so students have to stare at his crotch. I don't WANT to stare at his crotch. What can I do about it?" and 3) "I am genetically obese, I have tried every get-thin-strategy including surgery, diets, insane exercise, etc. but nothing works. I am used to unpleasant comments from people who don't understand about weight setpoints and genetic predispositions to obesity, but I am worried about my academic career. My graduate advisor recently told me that if I can't suck it up and lose weight that I might as well drop out of grad school because it will be wasted on me. Is she right?"
These three questions were the kind of topics I expected the book to be comprised of, as they are at least applicable to issues of being a woman in academia. Unfortunately, questions of this type (that is, directly relevant to the title of the book) were a rarity, I found. I was disappointed, however, to find that her responses, while for the most part useful and comforting, was speckled with off-color jokes. One choice excerpt in response to the third question I described: "Claim you're on a slow, medically approved diet. They don't have to know that your four food groups are whatever you like best -- such as chili corn dogs, sour cream and onion potato chips, Godiva Chocolates, and Budweiser." Ok look, sister. Not everyone is fat because they eat like a hog. That really made me mad. It turns out the book is sort of speckled with jokes like that throughout, though they are usually at the expense of out-groups (men, men, and more men) so I didn't notice it at first.
So in summary, I think this book had a few tidbits of important information but I would not suggest buying it. I checked it out from the library yesterday and will probably return it tomorrow. It was funny, but a lot of the time I was laughing because I couldn't figure out why this question was in a book about academia and women. Example: "When I get nervous, I get gassy. I don't have tenure yet. What if I fart at a bad moment?"
I don't know... you might like it, it was entertaining, but I don't feel like I learned anything new or useful.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Ouch-total dissapointment, Mar 18 2004
This review is from: Ms. Mentor's Impeccable Advice for Women in Academia (Paperback)
As I read this book, the mental star rating I had pictured went lower and lower. As a PhD student, this book is not useful. Mostly, because, for me...I know the difference between sexual harrasment and normal male and female interaction and do not need to read 400 letters addressing what to do if someone makes me star at their crotch or drops olives down my shirt at a holiday party. Another problem with this book is that the author flat out insults midwesterners AND people in the dept of education....so there you go....pretty hard for a gal from Chicago studying chemistry education to respect her opinions very much. According to Ms. Mentor I am boring and stupid. Thanks. I think Ms. Mentor needs to climb out of her ivory tower for 1 second and realize that the gen xers currently making their way out of grad school and academia are NOT introverted former NHS nerds who are interested in male-bashing she seems to be writing for. She presents a narrow sliver of academic life that may have been relevant in the 1970's but comes across as totally alien today.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No