A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
CDN$ 103.55
  • List Price: CDN$ 125.95
  • You Save: CDN$ 22.40 (18%)
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
A Metaphysics for Scienti... has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable Hardcover – Nov 5 2007


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 103.55
CDN$ 103.55 CDN$ 135.15

Black Friday Deals Week in Books
The Complete Gillian Flynn boxed set, which includes bestselling novel Gone Girl, is now 43% off as part of our Black Friday Deals. More Deals


Product Details


Product Description

Review

"The level of ambition is high, and in my opinion Chakravartty achieves what he aims at....Regardless of whether one is ultimately persuaded by the arguments presented in this book, it is a must-buy for anyone who is serious about the realist/anti-realist debate, as well as for anyone interested in the issue of the metaphysics of science."
--Jacob Busch, University of St Andrews, The Philosophical Quarterly


"Chakravartty embraces parts of entity realism and structural realism, but this is only the beginning. The justification for his semirealism includes a big dose of metaphysics, namely his accounts of causation and of natural kinds, among other things. Much of the book is given over to very detailed discussion of these issues. In a short review, I cannot hope to do justice to the full richness of Chakravartty's subtle and highly original treatment of these matters. Let me close with a simple recommendation to any who want to read the last word on scientific realism - this is it."
--James Robert Brown, Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences


"Chakravartty is clear and engaging in his writing, and charitable and judicious in his arguments with other philosophers. His book is essential reading for those interested in scientific realism or the metaphysics of science."
--James Ladyman, University of Bristol, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

Book Description

Anjan Chakravartty traces the contemporary evolution of realism by examining the most promising strategies adopted by its proponents in response to the forceful challenges of antirealist sceptics. His book offers a compelling vision of how realism can provide an internally consistent and coherent account of scientific knowledge.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 1 review
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful
Insightful and Well-Written Oct. 22 2008
By Bradley Monton - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This book provides an up-to-date look at the scientific realism/anti-realism debate, and provides a new take on that perennial philosphical issue. Specifically, Chakravartty is interested in defending a form of scientific realism, but not a naive sort of scientific realism. He develops a version of scientific realism that is, in part, informed by the new work being done on structural realism (while nevertheless remaining critical of a lot of the structural realists' arguments.) He's also interested in providing a metaphysics for scientific realism, but he tries to provide a metaphysics that the scientific anti-realist would be happy with (or at least, would be more sympathetic to than a standard metaphysics). For example, he believes in natural kinds, but he doesn't think that there's a single correct division of the world into natural kinds.

This novel, well-thought-out, and well-written take on these various issues leads me to recommend this book to anyone interested in current debates in philosophy of science or metaphysics.


Feedback