Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan's Military Economy Paperback – May 9 2007


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 50.91 CDN$ 17.16

Join Amazon Student in Canada



Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Paperback: 292 pages
  • Publisher: Fernwood Books (May 9 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0745325459
  • ISBN-13: 978-0745325453
  • Product Dimensions: 1.7 x 15.2 x 22.9 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 386 g
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #350,977 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

Format: Paperback
A truly genuine piece of hard work and a masterpiece by Ayesha Siddiqa. She goes in to much depth regarding Pakistan Armed forces' commercial interests and venture that are spread throughout the country. It is a great service that the author has rendered for Pakistan and should serve as a wakeup call for its people to begin to demand from their armed forces to return to their role as envisaged in the constitution.

No wonder the entire military establishment was up in arms against Ayesha Siddiqa for having this book published. They felt threatened by the exposure of their countless activities that went contrary to their role of 'protectors of the motherland'. Its time the Pakistan Armed Forces became less prominent in society, continued their current position as loyal soldiers to the civilians government and institutions while safeguarding Pakistan from external and internal threats.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 12 reviews
32 of 33 people found the following review helpful
Daring but substantive June 20 2007
By Saleem Ali - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Writing about the military in Pakistan can be risky business and the author of this book has shown tremendous courage in publishing this important work. However, the merit of this book is not because it is daring but rather because of the intellectual rigor and empirical detail provided. Unlike anti-establishment provocateurs who can often claim courage of conviction but not much else, Dr. Siddiqa has provided us with a well-substantiated account of financial hegemony in the military that deserves applause. While recognizing the vital importance of the military itself, the book unravels how essential security can be easily manipulated to accumulate wealth for a powerful elite.

The author starts with a structural premise that defines the phenomenon of "milbus" as "military capital used for the personal benefit of the military fraternity, especially the officer cadre, which is not recorded as part of the defence budget." She then goes on to situate this concept within the larger literature on the military industrial complex. Her lucid prose is also augmented by clear, tables, organizational charts, graphs and Venn diagrams. Her findings are staggering: for example, the amount of land owned by military officers through subsidized schemes amounts to $4.6 billion. The military pensions being offered are five times the amount for civilian officers. The role of the Fauji Foundation and other military organizations in running commercial enterprises that range from cereal manufacturing to running schools is astounding.

The usual argument given by proponents of milbus is that the military is the most disciplined organization and can do everything more efficiently. Yet, this logic is defied by most of the world's leading economic powers where development has occurred through private enterprise by educated and responsible citizens. Perhaps the author could have spent more time in evaluating these arguments. Nevertheless, given the range and scope of the matter at hand, Dr. Siddiqa has done a marvelous job with this manuscript. One can only hope the military will not feel threatened by this constructive criticism and use the the book as a means for initiating reform.
19 of 21 people found the following review helpful
Military Business Exposed May 27 2007
By Zeeshan-ul-hassan Usmani - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
The book is not only first of its kind on the secrets of Military Economics in Pakistan, it also contains the lessons a nation should learn on the limits of military engagements in civil insitutions.

Well written, and a brave effort.

5 stars
16 of 19 people found the following review helpful
Excellent Effort May 31 2007
By A. Tariq - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Hinderance in releasing this book in Pakistan is a clear indication of the authenticity of this book. Lessons to be learned.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Information revealing Not shocking--Visionary None Aug. 21 2011
By Farrukh - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This book should be very informative to outsiders. For Pakistanis, Dr. Siddiqa has discovered the obvious, not hidden from any Pakistani. Dr. Siddiqa probably has done good research work to gather facts (numbers), an effort not easy in that country. Her research is very narrow, focused largely on Milbus and the data around it--we now know the dollar value of "milbus." In doing so, it seems either the learned doctor is not an astute student of the history of Pakistan Vis-avis Army and its polity or she turned biased and has misinformed her audience. When it come to numbers and the Army's various organizations out to make a buck--quite right, but who is the beneficiary of revenues from acts of "milbus"? That balanced view is missing from her book. The other side of "milbus" need mentioning in her book--mostly retired soldiers and their families benefit. Milbus could also have been presented as the armies "Welfare Program," which an author with a balanced approach would not have missed. The country being poor and the democratic politicians mostly corrupt are not able to manage much; I find the act of "milbus" necessary to offer its veterans welfare. Dr. Siddiqa's research is NOT factual in terms of its history--for example contents of chapter 10. In chapter 10, Dr. Siddiqa stops short of giving opinion of other authors who have written extensively on subjects that she is addressing and is equally a valid claim. The author fail at times not telling the other side of the coin. I find her approach not being objective. Please see the following example.

In chapter 10, Dr. Siddiqa says, "The Pakistan military's economic interests are the result of the defence establishment's political clout..........in 1950s, the military gradually encroached into politics..." is not truthful based on overwhelming data by other authors. In 1949 the military had no political clout--today they do. Pakistan was created on the basis of democracy in 1947 and this relatively new democracy exercised greater power and clout than the new army of that day. A fact nicely narrated by an author, Brig. M. Hamid-Ud-Din, in his book, "Looking Back" and reader can be the judge of authenticity of that information. History shows that army was treated with disrespect by civil servants after Pakistan's independence. Civil government would not attend to officers when they visited their offices. The list is rather lengthy. The morale of the army was low, and the army's designs for India to address the Kashmir issue, which India was and is in violation of the terms of independence lacked support, mainly with General Gracey--a British officer, the then Chief of the Pakistan Army and due to Mr. Liaqat Ali Khan's unconventional approach to X-Gen. Akbar, explained later, seems a likely cause that India was not addressed, is a point of view of other authors. Hence, the army could not have done much regarding India that the author alludes to. Polity was the main lever then and they failed to address the Kashmir issue with India. After some years, the low morale of the army forced them to exercise their brute power, a brute power which the new democracy never had and the army's unjustified coup de ta was uncovered. That event made the new democracy think and gave the army basic privileges such as discount on fare tickets etc and the like. The military never encroached into politics then. It was Pakistan's great leader, Mr. Liaqat Ali Khan, who approached X-Gen. Akbar in an unconventional manner on the Kashmir matter. Why did Mr. L.A. Khan approached ONLY X-Gen. Akbar? X-Gen. Akbar was dragged into the mess, again read the above referenced book and a book written by X-Gen. Akbar, I believe it is called The Raiders of Kashmir.

It would have been interesting to know the point of view of Dr. Siddiqa, why Pakistan army officers opted for "milbus" and military regimes and not the Indian army, when both the armies were made from the same lot, all had graduated from either Sandhurst Military Academy, UK or IMA? Approach as such by the author would have made her book quite objective. Nonetheless, for a while now the army is committing acts of "Milbus", the author never indulges into if "milbus" is due to first the incompetency of polity or is due to some other factors. Rediscovering the obvious and attaching a dollar value to "milbus" is an accounting exercise and it does not fit the category of philosophic intellectual analytic wisdom, which I wished it did. The author should have spent time in explaining possible reasons for the army's involvement in acts of "milbus" and possible fixes, is my expectation from an objective writer.

It is an exercise of either Dr. Siddiqa got exhausted or she ran out of facts and could not find any more dirty laundry and ended the book. Or is it the author got paid to write this book and hence the likely direction. It is all of that, but NOT a constructive approach to making matters better. Pakistan needs a visionary and an analytical writer to get that country out of the center of paralysis.

Indeed, a courageous step Dr. Siddiqa took--from bright minds, which I believe she is, one should expect to provide the under pining of why Pakistan Army is involved in "Milbus" and its fix. A chapter or two to that end would have been an absorbing read and the book would have served well--her country. I gave it three stars because it is an academic exercise with data that Dr. Siddiqa was not able to put to good use. Sadly, the author ends her research at that. Four chapters of that would have been fine, it would have given a reader the same compelling message that she tries in some nine chapters, a fact well know inside Pakistan.

I would like this author to give us her second take, what are the causes and what is needed to fix "milbus." With an objective approach, I am sure she will make new friends at Military, Inc.!!!
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Why you should buy Military Inc. Jan. 27 2008
By Raymond Turney - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
I bought this book because Pakistan has recently been in the news, and sad to say will probably be in the news again. Since the author received death threats when the book was published and wisely left Pakistan, it seemed that she had earned my support, and also that the book had hit a nerve.

The background for the book is the theory, originating among US academics, that the military is the most modern institution in developing societies, and that a politically strong military will therefore develop a country. This view is associated with Morris Janowitz and Samuel Huntington. Being Pakistani, Ayesha Siddiqa has noticed that their theory has not worked. She explains why in this book.

The book covers: the theoretical concept of Milbus, which she introduces; the Pakistani military; the political history of Pakistani; the four foundations that run the major investments of the Pakistani military; diversion of state land to private purposes in the interest of senior military officers; the cost of Milbus; and some speculations about its likely impact on the future of Pakistan. These appear sound to a non-expert on the Pakistan army.

If asked to state her general thesis, I would use a metaphor that she does not, and say that the suggestion that the military can develop a developing country in effect casts it in the role of a Marxist vanguard party. It has some advantages in this role, notably including greater administrative competence than a Marxist vanguard party usually has. But it lacks a concept of the revolutionary transformation of society, and it has a entirely different mission from social development, which is national defense. It is subject to the same tendency to corruption as a Marxist vanguard party. So the military can develop society to a certain extent, but does so in the interest of military officers, who become a class in the Marxist sense themselves. Corruption, diversion of public resources to private purposes, etc, which are a big issue with Marxist vanguard parties in power, are also serious problems with military led development. The author claims, and makes a fairly good case to support her claim, that the economic interests of the military both increase its political power, and give it an incentive to expand its political power rather than "returning to barracks".

It is not clear how large a portion of Pakistan's economy the military controls, but a few figures she offers near the end suggest that it is anywhere from 3-10%.

This book is an academic sociological work, not a call to action. It adheres to the conventions of academic work, meaning that it has a lot of jargon and is fairly difficult to read. It also addresses a specific problem, not just the military but military involvement in business. Pakistan has enough other problems that this should not be used as an introduction to the sociology of Pakistan.

That said, I hope she sells a lot of copies.

In the US we're relying on the Pakistani army, so we should know something about its downsides, and why many Pakistanis are not wild about it. The fact that the Pakistani army is arguably not really a national institution, because its personnel are recruited almost exclusively from the Punjab and the NW Frontier, has interesting implications.

In short, I agree with Lee Hamilton and Ahmed Rashid, who recommend the book.

Product Images from Customers

Search


Feedback