| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Gould's argument is fairly straightforward. He is of the opinion that the differences *between* racial groups are on average no greater than the differences *within* racial groups. How Gould's argument could get so distorted and why it gets so many people upset tells me that some people have a need to feel superior and like thinking that there is a scientific justification for them to feel superior.
Based on his analysis of historical instances of intelligence testing, he is also of the opinion that the general goal of intelligence testing has been to (1) come up with a single number scale, ranked highest to lowest, that can be used to peg people in a hierarchy of intelligence and then (2) use the results of that numbering scheme to determine social policies used on those people and (3) pass those results on to the public to reinforce the idea that those people who are disadvantaged actually deserve to be disadvantaged because they belong to an inferior race.
You can gauge based on how upset people get at Gould's reasoning how close to the truth -- and to the nerve -- he is striking.
I think this is an excellent and superbly argued book, and should be read by more people.
If, on the other hand, you want to believe that IQ exist, (which is not to say life isn't complicated: As a simple example we could talk about a thing called Physical Strength, and believe it exist, even if someone else points out that there is "arm" strength and "leg" strength and proceeds to quibble and moan about your tests of strength ... not that I want to take this analogy any further), OR what you want is "objectivity", read the Bell Curve.
Sincerely,
Mark D. Stump
|