Today Only: "Amazon Exclusive: The James Bond Collection + Spectre" for $119.99 (60% Off)
For one day only: "Amazon Exclusive: The James Bond Collection + Spectre" is at a one day special price. Offer valid on February 9, 2016, applies only to purchases of products sold by Amazon.ca, and does not apply to products sold by third-party merchants and other sellers through the Amazon.ca site. Learn more.
It's just your typical boy-dumps-girl, boy-has-change-of-heart, boy-alienates-girl-anew love story. This romantic comedy, the last word on obsessive, can't-live-with-'em, can't-live-without-'em relationships, holds a special place in the hearts of Albert Brooks fans.
Brooks stars as film editor Robert Cole, who breaks up--again, apparently--with Mary (Kathryn Harrold). They are in a no-win situation, he tells her, like Vietnam. The sequence that follows is an excruciating, intimately observed tour de force: Robert's long night's journey into day. Miserable, spaced out on Quaaludes, he stumbles around his apartment, admiring his record collection ("I love my albums"), rifling through his Rolodex, making a blind date call he will instantly regret.
He becomes determined to win Mary back, but again falls prey to his possessiveness and paranoia, as when he happens to find Mary's phone bill and becomes obsessed over a long-distance number.
Modern Romance is characteristically deadpan in its depiction of one man behaving badly. The dialogue is vintage Brooks, as when he tells a colleague (Bruno Kirby) that he and Mary always enjoyed great sex but could never really talk. "Do you need to talk?" his friend asks, which would be the topper in anyone else's comedy. But Brooks dismisses this cheap joke with, "We're men. Can we have a bond?"
A hilarious subplot concerns Robert's work on a cheesy science fiction film that stars George Kennedy. James L. Brooks (no relation), who would direct Brooks to an Oscar nomination in Broadcast News, is hysterical as the deluded director who resists Robert's best, painstaking efforts to improve the film.
For some, Modern Romance is a comedy, for others, a horror film (Robert is as relentless as Michael Myers and as much a nightmare as Freddy). See it and squirm with someone you love. --Donald Liebenson --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Brooks's first three films certified his status as a legend in the minds of comedy fans. Often described as a "jockier version of Woody Allen," Albert cultivated his own cinematic shtick during the late seventies and early early eighties -- a technique which capitalizes on a number of elements that quickly became Brooks trademarks, particularly self-parody; Bob Newhart-style telephone conversations (and man-against-the-odds conversations, where Brooks protagonists get in way over their heads, but make laughable, quixotic attempts to fight their way out); and gags built entirely around the use of a specific (often confined) setting. In "Modern Romance," these elements come to full fruition.
As in "Real Life" (1979) and "Lost in America," (1985) Brooks plays an exaggerated version of himself -- a neurotic, compulsive, self-obsessed opportunist. He's Robert Cole, a film editor for American International Pictures, who breaks up with his girlfriend, bank teller Mary Harvard (Kathryn Harrold), because they can't communicate ("You've heard of a no-win situation, right?... No? You've never heard of one? Vietnam...? This...?") but instinctively regrets his decision and spends a miserable night strung out on quaaludes, stumbling around his house, crashing into walls, and calling friends to talk about deep feelings. When Robert finally launches a successful, obsessive attempt to win Mary back with a porch full of stuffed animals, they can't stay together for more than two days, because he's such a paranoid shmuck that he won't give her enough freedom to function.
"Modern Romance" is a classic example of how comic genius (and clever presentation) can lift an ordinary premise to the level of brilliance. The picture brims with hundreds of hilarious one-liners and running gags. The phrase, "I love you" becomes a piece of shtick, in itself, because Cole uses it like a self-explanatory mantra, to account for his obsessive behaviour. ("This is only happening because I love you."; ""The problem is that I'm in *love*...!" "Here we go... I LOVE YA!") The most impressive aspect of the picture is that Brooks carries 80% of the scenes completely alone -- he talks to himself while driving, shaving, checking his vitamin cabinet ("Got any B6? No B6? Outta C? Got E... the old standby!") -- and manages to be consistently hilarious and credible!
Cole is so obnoxious, and yet -- somehow -- so painfully funny and believable (remember Charles Grodin's self-destructive character in "The Heartbreak Kid"?), that while we're aghast that he'd be insensitive enough to tell an old friend, "I'll call you right back" and write the number in the air with his finger, or to interrupt his girlfriend's business dinner with clients in the middle of a crowded restaurant, we're laughing the entire time.
And yet, I think the Cole character is only one of the film's two major strengths. The other: "Modern Romance" seems to challenge (though not defy) the boundaries of cinematic milieux. According to some sources, Stanley Kubrick was fascinated by this film, which fell in-between "The Shining" (1980) and "Full Metal Jacket" (1987) -- in one story, Kubrick called Brooks after he attended a theatrical screening of "Modern Romance," and the two tried to strike up a friendship. That story may be apocryphal, but if not, I wouldn't be surprised. Here's why: in "Modern Romance," screenwriter/director Brooks manages to give an illusion of greater depth to the cinematic world than what we normally sense in movies -- the structure of the film, in a way, seems driven by the central character. It feels as if Cole has freedom beyond the confines of the screen -- the ability to move into other *environments* -- eg. the film editing booth, Santa Monica-area stores, the Santa Monica freeway, Idlewhile. (He spends half of the film simply driving from location to location, and making each decision on the gut level, led by whims). The hilarious scenes where Brooks edits a B budget Sci-fi picture, in fact, have *nothing* to do with the film's central premise of Robert-winning-Mary-back. So, why include them? Perhaps because it gives the characters, in a way, more mobility -- and creates the anti-Brechtian illusion of a vast world beyond the confines of the movie set.
Now: if we think about the structure of "Full Metal Jacket," where Kubrick cemented the audience in one world (the military base) and restarted halfway through with another (the war), or -- even earlier -- "2001: A Space Odyssey," where the structure resembles three loosely-linked films, each with separate environments (The Dawn of Man/The Voyage to Jupiter/ Jupiter), we'll notice that Kubrick, in an overt, explicit way, pushed cinematic boundaries.
Brooks, on the other hand, merely nudges the boundaries out a little bit -- and because of that, the film feels more free and less restrictive than the reality of standard narrative cinema.
On a final note: though it wasn't intended as a period piece when shot in late 1980 and released in March of '81, twenty years since Modern Romance's general release have given it a distinctly un-modern, period feel. The music ("Another One Bites the Dust," "She's Out of My Life," "A Fifth of Beethoven," etc.) the references to films from the late seventies and early eighties (Bogdanovich's "Nickelodeon," Cimino's "Heaven's Gate,") the early-80s attire (like the brown jumpsuit Cole wears), and Cole's analog answering machine all evoke feelings of nostalgia for that brief, post-disco, pre-Reagan span of time that appeared and disappeared all too quickly.
A quick piece of trivia about "Modern Romance": according to Albert Brooks fan sites, Brooks and Harrold dated briefly in real life, following this picture. Harrold can be seen in Jaglom's "Someone to Love" (1985), playing herself at a party for singles.
Other, similar films you should check out if you enjoy this picture: "The Heartbreak Kid" (1971), "Cross My Heart" (1987), Bobby Roth's "Heartbreakers" (1984) with Harrold, Brooks's "Lost in America" (1985).
Spectacular performaces from Mr. Brooks, Kathryn Harold, Bruno Kirby, and terrific cameos from James L. Brooks (no relation), Bob "Super Dave Osborne" Einstein (who IS Brooks' brother....Yes, Albert Brooks real name is....Albert Einstein!), George Kennedy and, believe it or not, Harlem Globetrotter Meadowlark Lemon. If for no other reason, see this movie for "the movie within the movie" that Brooks' and Kirby's characters are editing. "You're acting like little WEASELS!"
Enjoy...very highly recommended!
Brooks, as usual, plays the usual and same character, himself. with Kathryn Harrold as the love of his life. Brooks is up to his usual insecurities here wondering whether Harrold is cheating on him, obsessing over every little detail. One of the best scenes in the film is when he's depressed over one of the many breakups and is given Quaaludes to relax him. When they start to kick in he starts a rant on how great his belongings are. Loving everything he owns including his record collection, his bird "Petey", and deciding to go through his rolodex and calling old girlfriends.* (*When doing Quaaludes stay away from the phone.)
Modern Romance has its best moments when it has nothing to do with the Brooks-Harrold story, but rather when Bruno Kirby as Brooks's best friend is on screen. Another highlight is the film that Brooks and Kirby are editing, an absurd, cheesy sci-fi romp starring George Kennedy. It's got nothing whatsoever to do with the main storyline, but is the most memorable part of the movie which makes the repetition and relative tameness of the primary plot seem all the more obvious. If you like Albert Brooks you'll like this movie. If you don't know his work, picture George Costanza in his own show.
It had been a while since I watched this movie until I ran across it on cable this weekend. Of course, it is difficult to catch the entire movie that way (I saw parts of it again, twice) so I decided to try to find it on DVD.
Much to my amazement, this is about the only Albert Brooks movie that is not available on DVD! Even "Real Life" is available on DVD -- released over 3 1/2 years ago!
What are they waiting for?