Away at college, Sidney Prescott (Campbell) thought she’d finally put the shocking murders that shattered her life behind her… until a copycat killer begins acting out a real-life sequel. Now as history repeats itself, ambitious reporter Gale Weathers (Cox), deputy Dewey (Arquette) and other Scream survivors find themselves trapped in a terrifyingly clever plotline where no one is safe – or beyond suspicion – in this “delicious, diabolical and fun” (Rolling Stone) sequel.
It was the last one I needed for my 'Scream collection'! Part one will always be the best, but this one is my second favourite in the collection. Part 3 is terrible in my opinion. Read morePublished on Dec 10 2012 by JillyAE
Set two years after the murders in Woodsboro, Sydney Prescott ( Neve Campbell) is back and in College, now a Copycat killer who is copying a recent slasher movie is on the loose... Read morePublished on April 5 2003 by John Lindsey
...in this great follow-up of the original Scream. A different setting, new actors and a great movie-in-movie gag make Scream 2 very different from the first. Read morePublished on March 26 2003 by Sebastian Groß
The film itself is great. With enough jolts to keep you wetting the seat, and shrieks to keep you coughing, it works. Read morePublished on Feb. 18 2003 by Stokley Krouse
Wow, this is a shock, this one is actually better than the first! Fully aware of its status as the sequel to the surprise hit thriller of 1996, this lively follow-up trades... Read morePublished on Feb. 4 2003 by Tom Servo
Although Scream 2 is a good sequel in many respects, I felt that this film lacked much of the freshness of the first. Read morePublished on Jan. 28 2003 by musiclover13
Scream 2 saw an improvement to the series because the body count was 3 times as high than the first, there were some twists and turns and an all star cast doesn't hurt either. Read morePublished on Jan. 2 2003 by E. Batica