Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here

Nymphomaniac 1 [Blu-ray] [Import]

 Unrated   Blu-ray

Price: CDN$ 32.74 & FREE Shipping. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 6 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Tuesday, September 23? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.
Today Only: Up to 80% off Select Judi Dench Collections
Own Elizabeth Gaskell and The Judi Dench Collection at a one-day special price.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Product Details

  • Format: AC-3, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC, Import
  • Language: English
  • Subtitles: Spanish
  • Region: Region A/1
  • Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • MPAA Rating: UNRATED
  • Studio: Magnolia
  • Release Date: July 8 2014
  • ASIN: B00JVQ7PYS


Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 3.4 out of 5 stars  170 reviews
65 of 68 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A Disturbing and Honest Story of Addiction March 20 2014
By MoVwatcher20 - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
"Nymphomaniac," a two-part drama from director Lars von Trier, tackles the issue of sex addiction as brutally and unapologetically as "Requiem for a Dream" did with drug addiction. And while this film is unlikely to receive the kind of accolades that "Requiem" did upon its release, it is still a deeply moving film that explores a very real and very disturbing problem. The film boasts a number of well-known actors, including Charlotte Gainsbourg (Antichrist), Uma Thurman (Pulp Fiction), Shia LaBeouf (Transformers) and Christian Slater (True Romance), who each bring the film to life with all-around solid performances.

The film, right from the opening scene, lets you know pretty quickly what you're in for. It opens in England on a snowy evening where a woman (Gainsbourg) lies beaten and unconscious in an alleyway, where she is helped by a lonely older man named Seligman (Stellan Skarsgard). After she refuses to let him call the police, he takes her back to his apartment, where of course, he asks to know what happened to her. The woman, named Joe, reveals to him that she is a nymphomaniac and explains that in order for him to truly understand how she ended up in the alley, she would have to start from the very beginning. This is where the story really begins, and through extended flashbacks, we are transported to the earlier days of Joe's life (the younger Joe is played by Stacy Martin), beginning with her childhood where she was raised by her cold, distant mother (Connie Nielson) and her devoted father (Christian Slater). Troubled by her parents' dysfunctional relationship, Joe has gone through life with an antagonistic view of love. She also finds it difficult to feel emotionally connected to anyone or anything. In fact, the only means she has of filling this void is through sex. She goes from having sex just to try it to engaging in a contest with her friend over who can have sex with the most men on a train, all for a bag of chocolates. It's not too long before Joe's social and emotional fulfillment consist entirely of sex, reaching a point to where she has so many lovers that she can't even tell them apart and must resort to listing them as letters of the alphabet. Her addiction is such that even after being confronted by the heartbroken wife of one her lovers, played with great intensity by Uma Thurman, she continues on with her lifestyle despite the toll her actions are taking on her.

Suffice it to say, this film is not for everyone, and it certainly isn't trying to be. The film is very explicit in its language and depictions of sex, and therefore it's not going to appeal to people who find such content offensive. Now, on the other hand, if you're going into this hoping for "50 Shades of Grey: the Movie," then this is not the film you're looking for. There may be numerous sex scenes in the film and they are indeed graphic, but only because of how realistic they feel. They are not meant to be gratuitous or sexy. In fact, quite the opposite. During these scenes, you feel the kind of discomfort that you would with a film about a drug addict in that you are witnessing a person destroy themselves. As an audience member, you want to reach out to Joe and tell her to stop but of course, you can't, making it all the more distressing to watch. This is not what you'd call "a light at the end of the tunnel" kind of movie, another reason why it's definitely not for everybody.

That said, to anyone who truly appreciates the kind of great filmmaking that this is, then I would daresay this is a must-see. On a visual level, this has to be one of the most beautifully shot films I've seen in a long time. In the beginning scene alone, there's a shot of snow falling in an alleyway and it's done in a way where the snow looks like it's popping right off the screen.

The performances are really what make this film work as well as it does. Charlotte Gainsbourg, who, despite not being in the film all that much, is captivating whenever she's onscreen. She deftly captures Joe's despair and self-hatred so that despite her wrongdoings, we still feel sympathy towards her. Stacy Martin as young Joe likewise captures the character's lack of social confidence. I can see many young actresses being intimidated to take on a role as physically demanding as this, but Martin handles her numerous sex scenes very professionally. Stellan Skarsgard is completely charming and funny as Joe's seemingly nonjudgmental savior who continually tries to justify her actions to her, even going so far as to compare her condition to fly-fishing. I would say that Shia LaBeouf is the weakest link here, who just kind of mumbles his way through his lines, probably to hide his atrocious attempt at a cockney accent. He's not bad in the film, but compared to the performances of his fellow cast members, his feels the least inspired. On the other hand, a performance that does feel very inspired comes from Christian Slater as Joe's father. Seriously, how long has it been since you could say that? Slater, in the limited screen time he is given, proves that he can do much more than a decent Jack Nicholson impersonation and has a much wider range than he gets credit for. The relationship between his character and Joe is beautiful and heartwarming and it makes you want to see more of Slater again. Hopefully this film will help to put him back on the map and that he'll get some more films worth his talent. Fingers crossed.

"Nymphomaniac" is very bold in how it addresses sex addiction. It does not point fingers or try to vilify sex addicts but rather explores the psychology of someone driven to this kind of lifestyle. Despite how disturbing and gloomy this film is, I still greatly look forward to Volume Two (which comes out this April)and am curious to see how this fascinating story concludes. I give this film five stars and only hope that the second part of the film is just as impressive.
15 of 17 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars In which Lars von Trier makes Fly Fishing and Cake Forks better-than-Sex March 30 2014
By Ben Pieper - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
Respect or despise him, Lars von Trier is one of the most talented directors in international cinema today. Over the past few years von Trier has infuriated me with Dogville, scarred me with Antichrist, and hypnotized me with Melancholia. I happen to thoroughly enjoy all of these films as cinematic experiences, even if I wouldn’t necessarily want to watch them again or even recommend them to anybody (well, I wouldn’t recommend Antichrist to just anybody).

As a fan of the director’s work, I was naturally drawn to what was being billed as a four-plus hour opus: Nymphomaniac. Myriad rumors have emerged in the past year leading up to the film’s two-part release about whether or not the actors actually participated in the sex their characters have onscreen. Art house release disadvantages aside, it is ironic that sex doesn’t seem to be selling this movie very well at all; but it is fitting that the old adage does not apply to von Trier’s latest. The film’s commercial release is not unlike last year’s Spring Breakers; a film that lures viewers in with the no-thinking-required tantalization of sexy young starlets but ends up conveying a much-thinking-required societal message. Despite the fact that the film is full of sex scenes, Nymphomaniac is more likely to satiate viewers intellectually then give them a snuff film fix.

Coming from a man who has opened his films with slow-motion sequences of apocalyptic planet collisions and infants falling to their death, the first part of von Trier’s two-part project is surprisingly amiable in its tone. In this way, the inviting, although brooding, film mirrors the demeanor of the kindly Seligman (Stellan Skarsgard) an old man who takes in Jo (Charlotte Gainsbourg) a woman whom he finds beaten in an alley. Gainsbourg has never been an average actress, and she is far from portraying an “average Jo.” Skeptical about Jo’s immediate claim that she is a “bad human being” Seligman listens to the origins of and turning points of her lifelong odyssey of meaningless sexual endeavors. The series of flashbacks in this first volume feature Stacy Martin as Young Jo, and achieves seamless coherency with her older counterpart. Many of the seminal characters in Volume I are portrayed by actors that many viewers have not seen onscreen for some time including Uma Thurman as a spouse scorned, Shia LaBeouf as the man who takes Jo’s virginity, and Christian Slater as Jo’s tree-enamored father.

Many critics and especially “offended” viewers will comment on the endless explicitness of Nymphomaniac’s sex scenes. Yeah. There is lots of sex in a movie called Nymphomaniac; von Trier ensures that audiences get what they pay for. The most memorable moments of the film do not depend on cunnilingus, train bathroom trysts, or Martin’s nipples. Von Trier’s script nixes straight-up pornography in favor of extended metaphor that effortlessly intermingle addiction, sex, and love to everything from Bach and fly fishing, to cake forks and jigsaw puzzles. Going into the film expecting a balls-to-the-wall orgy would be like watching Drive to get a Fast and the Furious gearhead fix. At its base level Nymphomaniac: Volume I is a pleasant, visually-engaging, philosophical conversation between two intelligent, passionate people.
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Surprisingly Good March 19 2014
By NicoleGarofolo - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
Although this film is controversial for its extremely graphic sex scenes, I feel it is in some ways less gratuitous than in many mainstream films. It feels natural with the storyline. The acting is superb, the story riveting, and the photography beautiful. I started this movie intrigued by the controversial elements and completely forgot about them by the end. I definitely recommend this film for those with an open mind.
20 of 26 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars 3 + 5 = 8? March 28 2014
By Andrew Ellington - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
There are a handful of directors who have created such buzz surrounding their distinct voices that there is talk about them, their films and their methods with every film, before, after and even long after he’s moved on to something else. Lars von Trier is probably the king of this. Since his start in the early 90’s, von Trier has graced audiences (small audiences, but audiences) with his perverse and often shocking depictions of sexuality, sexism and masochism. Sometimes, he finds ways to shade his own ideas, philosophies, theories and musings with enough style and depth to make them feel warranted, making the shock of it all carry the weight it needs to sit on our palate.

And then other times he just shows us a lot of pictures of genitals and expects us to feel something other than repulsion.

Now, I’ve been a longstanding champion of von Trier and his vision. While others have tossed many disparaging remarks his way and have taken arms against some of his more recent films, I’ve stood my ground and played devil’s advocate in his favor. ‘Antichrist’ was a pretty disturbing film, but when all was said and done there was an underlying purpose to von Trier’s madness, and while it didn’t all translate how he would have liked (or at least how the audience would have liked) there is no denying that von Trier had a pretty bold narrative and some pretty confident points to entertain, and the core performance from Charlotte Gainsbourg was astonishingly grounded in the context of the film (such a fearless performance, through and through).

I can’t defend this.

‘Nymphomaniac: Vol. 1 & 2’ is basically a four hour film that recounts a young woman’s many, many, many sexual trysts. Pretending to exploit (here we go again with exploitation in film) the double standard that abounds within the treatment of men and women, especially in a sexual context, ‘Nymphomaniac’ confuses all of its own ideals in a strange hodgepodge of ‘chapters’ that drone on and on and ultimately take us nowhere. Opening with a beaten young woman named Joe being helped off the street by the neighborhood psychiatrist, Seligman, and then delving into the depths of carnal lusting and abuse, ‘Nymphomaniac’ is probably one of the most self-absorbed and self-indulgent films I’ve ever had the displeasure of seeing.

I think that Lars von Trier has a deep-seated interest in uncovering the depths of a woman’s psyche. I don’t think that he is a misogynist at all. In fact, I tend to side with Uma Thurman on this subject:

“He’s a very provocative filmmaker, but he writes women with more depth and respect and complexity than most writers. The idea that people debate whether he’s a misogynist? People should debate whether people who don’t even write women are misogynist. The fact is, he’s dedicated a large portion of his artistic life to the exploration of the female psyche—good and bad, light and dark, shadows, textures. The fact that he’s dedicated a huge part of his talents to that, to me, defies the concept that he doesn’t have respect, interest, and genuine compassion in women. People should question writers that don’t even give a d*** about a female character. They are the misogynists.”

Sadly, this respect and intrigue isn’t seen very well here at all. Instead, ‘Nymphomaniac’ feels about as misogynist as they come, and at the end of the day it’s even worse than that; the film feels just plain trashy. Lars von Trier has built a career out of shock value, but his shocking contributions to film have always felt grounded in a linier plot or at least in an idea that has sprouted into madness, but a clear idea at the core. Most of ‘Nymphomaniac’ feels nonsensical and devoid of rational narrative, and while he tries to find some footing in the film’s final throws, he never establishes anything concrete within Joe’s story to hook us to her, to latch onto us and so it all winds up feeling rather misguided.

There is a point here, but von Trier doesn’t know what it is.

Instead, von Trier treats us to a young girl’s dissention into depravity. She prostitutes herself for sexual pleasure at a very young age, playing games with her best friend and even forming a club that’s primary focus was to rack up sexual partners, never forming a lasting relationship with anyone (no one lay to be repeated), and Joe recounts her story with absolutely no emotion, as if none of it matters (because it doesn’t) and Seligman tries to liken her whorish behavior to numbers and fish while she relates it all to her dying father and an ash tree; and while Joe is pretending she’s falling in love with Shia LaBeouf (because that could never happen for real), volume 1 ends and volume 2 begins and this is where things get dicey. Sexual pleasure is lost, which leads to Joe finding her own personal Fight Club and hiring translators to hook her up with Africans and before we know it, Joe has become a Soprano and is grooming a freaky eared nymph to take her place, and her man.

And then Seligman takes off his pants.

There is so much going on here and yet none of it ever feels necessary. It is all just there to make your eyes hurt (they will hurt) and the film’s primary point seems to center on how Joe’s disturbing actions are all validated because men are disgusting pigs and she is living in the repressed guilt of her of desires, but it’s not that simple and yet von Trier never steps back from his own visual shockfest long enough to try and actually develop these themes. Instead he’d rather show us a bunch of genitalia and sexual acts and then force feed us a finale that feels appropriate ONLY because the film pretty much sets us up for a cop-out ending.

There is such a thing as being bold and fearless, and ‘Nymphomaniac’ is both of those things, but it is also soulless and hollow, and when you are both of THOSE things, bold and fearless will only harm you.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Dreary and miserable. April 4 2014
By Goodwife Weaver - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
After all the hype, and seeing the rental price drop a bit, I decided to had to see what the big deal was. I was "treated" to a film that was almost 100% across the board miserable. Not miserable in a deep way, not miserable in a revealing way, not miserable in a beautiful way - Just. Miserable. The story is miserable, the sets are miserable, and most of all, the girl who plays Young Joe is miserable here, and lacks the credibility needed in the part.

I think what bothered me most is that there simply didn't seem to be a real STORY here. It was just nonsense. I wish the film had shown something about the young sexual lives of women that was based in some kind of reality. There was no gradual development of Joe's character, nothing that genuinely moved her toward nymphomania. No real examination of the sexual development of girls, or how girls actually experience sexuality. It was like she entered puberty and suddenly started screwing random old men. There seems to be no genuine motivation to her behavior - aside from her claim of "rebelling against love." Though we hear next to nothing about that, about why, no real examination of this at all.

Half of me wants to watch the 2nd volume of this story, simply because I wonder if it will go anywhere. But considering that the story is supposedly going to get darker, I can't imagine it being anything other than another miseryfest with a bunch of ugly genitals thrown in for good measure. Depressing.

Look for similar items by category


Feedback