| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
Very informative, great reference,
This review is from: On the Social Contract (Paperback)
I've had this text referenced several times in Political Science classes. Reading through this book provides great background on an important topic. I'd recommend this to any person studying, or with an interest in, Political Science, Philosophy, or theory on how the state works.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta) Amazon.com:
4.5 out of 5 stars (6 customer reviews) 3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Essential Philosophy,
By Bill R. Moore - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: On the Social Contract (Paperback)
On Social Contract is now considered Rousseau's most important work, and it is easy to see why. He of course did not invent the social contract; Thomas Hobbes' 1651 Leviathan is generally considered its foundation, but elements are visible at least as far back as Plato. It had dominated Western political thought since Hobbes, though, and Rousseau's contribution is one of the most important. He looks at the question more thoroughly and systematically than anyone since Hobbes and, though he admired the latter, comes to almost the opposite conclusion. His arguments for a social contract are strong - nay, near-undeniable - but, more importantly and unlike many, he actually goes into how to implement one in considerable detail. The work is again remarkable for being very well-written. As it is significantly longer than the Discourses, the quality is not as uniform; several chapters, especially those on the Roman republic, are more or less tangential, and there are other weak spots. That said, the vast majority is extremely engaging and generally lucid. One can come away from On Social Contract with an almost spiritually intense belief in its central tenets, and many have; Poland and Corsica both asked Rousseau to propose a constitution, and the French Revolution may well not have happened without him. The book was enormously influential throughout the twentieth century and continues to be. Unfortunately, though, the vaguest parts are precisely those that are the most specific about how Rousseau's social contract can be actualized. His infamous claim that we must be "forced to be free" has long been controversial, as have related statements about the General Will's infallibility, absolute sovereignty, anti-monarchialism, and religion. They are near-paradoxical at times and open to a wide interpretation variety. This is how Rousseau has been able to influence people at opposite ends of the political spectrum. He has been credited or blamed - depending on point of view - for everything from the French Revolution to Hitler and Stalin. His philosophical ties to these last have been near-definitively refuted in recent decades, but the book is such we can see how such misconceptions arose. Near-insurmountable pessimism about his own ideals, including his famous statement that only gods would be fit for a democracy, has also frustrated even his strongest admirers. As with all important controversial books, the key is to form one's own conclusions. Few seminal works have greater potential for viable individual interpretation and general applicability.This gets to the crux of reading Rousseau; he probably invokes the greatest reaction disparity of all philosophers. One almost literally either loves or hates him. Many have idolized and based their whole lives and philosophies on him; at least as many have done the opposite. Those who value originality and writing qualities like general lucidity and conciseness will likely love Rousseau, as he here excels nearly all philosophers and even many literary writers. However, empiricists and others who value truth and facts above all, as well as those who are eminently practical, may well loathe him. Discourse on Inequality's infamous statement that it will ignore facts because they have no bearing on the issue has appalled many ever since publication. Even so, Rousseau's importance and influence are such that anyone seriously interested in philosophy or political thought must read him. Not everyone will agree with him, but he has been at least as valuable to dissenters as to advocates, and the trend continues.
3.0 out of 5 stars
Unnecessarily in love with his own voice.,
By Matthew M. Howell - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: On the Social Contract (Paperback)
Social Contract is rather like celery - Interesting, but unnecessarily chewy, an effort for which one feels in the end somewhat under-recompensed. This is a case where I would recommend reading a summary, as his wording adds nothing and detracts somewhat.
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good points...,
By M. G. Mohring - Published on Amazon.com
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: On the Social Contract (Paperback)
This book has very good points, it is a little long winded at times. It is a classic text of the enlightenment. Overall I would consider it a worth while read....
|
|
|
|
|