41 of 45 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Sensible, calm, helpful, Jun 29 2005
By Gontroppo "Music and Theology Lover" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: One Bible Only?: Examining Exclusive Claims for theKing James Bible (Paperback)
This book is written by fundamentalists to fundamentalists. It is well-written and gives an excellent defence of the eclectic approach to textual criticism. It shows clearly that the idea that the King James Version is the only inspired one is unbiblical and illogical.
The authors of the various articles show that all of the arguments for KJV-Onlyism are based on false information.
But the book also contains insights into bible translation and lots of useful information about the manuscripts from which we got our bible, both Old and New Testaments.
The writers write respectfully, with due praise for the King James Version and with courtesy to those who hold different points of view to them.
I have learnt quite a bit from this book, despite having previously read books such as Carson's The King James Version Debate: a plea for realism [which I also recommend, despite its age.]
Warmly recommended.
30 of 36 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Reasonable and Helpful, Feb 11 2006
By GreenParrot "GreenParrot" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: One Bible Only?: Examining Exclusive Claims for theKing James Bible (Paperback)
Where did Jesus say in Matthew 24:35 that the AV 1611 (a.k.a. the King James version) is the only word of God? Where in His wonderful words: "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away" does he say anything about His word ending up ONLY in a book in 1611 and then a little later with King James of England's name on it?
What Jesus Christ is saying is "His words" which are everything He spoke, because He is God, shall never pass away, they will always stand, even long after the temporary things such as the heaven and earth pass away. It's sad that some people actually believe the absurdity of Gipp, Waite, Ruckman, and Riplinger that by "His words" he spoke them in KJV English. He spoke Aramaic, and being God He most likely knew Greek as well.
What He is essentially saying in Matthew 24:35 is that everything He says stands and cannot, will not change. In other words, we can trust Him to not recant, not reneg, not go back on any one of His many promises. We also can trust that every command He gave will also stand forever. His word exists in the KJV, as well as the updated English versions (put into our modern language, just as the KJV was in their day) such as NKJV and NASB. God never said He would one day translate His word into one version ultimately and then that would be it. He said He would preserve it forever, which means He will continue to preserve it for eternity, and this includes the decent English language updates that are done every couple of decades to keep the language clear for the reader as language adapts. There have been many changes in the modern English since 1611.
His word was spoken and existed long, long before He even created the earth and universe. It is as eternal as He is, since He is not limited nor controlled by time. His spoken word transcends even the pages of a writtetn text which is limited by language translation in every language of the earth. The Holy Spirit is the One who helps us understand what His written word is saying. His spoken word existed for eternity before He wrote it down for mankind.
Matthew 24:35, along with Psalm 12:6-7, has been twisted way out of context and misused by those who wish to conform them to their KJV onlyist stance. This is taking license with God's word in creating new doctrine not literally and implicitly stated forth in what He said. We must take all his words, in all the verses, in context with one another in the passage in which they belong.
To take the KJVO stance so strongly, as most of the extremists do, is to revert back to the persecution and control which the Roman Catholic church forced upon anyone who was caught with any bible that was not the Latin Vulgate. Men like Tyndale and others were martyred by the RCC for translating the English bible into the language of the common man so they could read it in their own words and understand God's word. The KJVO extremists hold the same mindset as the RCC with its Latin Vulgate version. This needs some serious thought.
This book is an excellent book that explains more of the above and the many KJVO distortions which have caused contentions and confusion and deception inside many wonderful and well-meaning fundamental churches. We need to listen to the voice of reason and what God is actually saying in His word and not twist it to what we want it to say, as if twisting His arm to back up our own faulty arguments. The KJVO argument is extremely faulty. Anyone can see this if they have eyes to see and ears to hear.
20 of 24 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Defining Deliverance For the Layman!, Oct 29 2001
By Karla R. Brien - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: One Bible Only?: Examining Exclusive Claims for theKing James Bible (Paperback)
This book's consise format takes the reader through the history of the KJV-only issue and delves into all the hot spots without resorting to name calling as most Pro-KJV authors do (ie. Riplinger, Ruckman, Grady). The truth of God's inerrant Word shines brightly through the pages as we see clearly the translational process and preservation of our bibles today. Another plus is that the language is formidable-- what you would expect from educated, Godly authors! Carson and White's books were good, but this is the best yet.