Opening Skinners Box Hardcover – Feb 24 2004
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
From Publishers Weekly
Psychologist Slater's account of 10 of the most influential-and controversial-experimental forays into the mind's inner workings is neither clinical nor dispassionate. Slater (Lying, a Metaphorical Memoir) is a relentlessly inquisitive eccentric somewhat in the mold of Janet Malcolm, and her examinations of such (in)famous experiments as Stanley Milgram's "electric shock" obedience studies and Harry Harlow's "wire monkey" attachment researches are defiantly personal, even intimate. Slater takes the often bleak news about the predictability and malleability of human behavior revealed by such theorists as B.F. Skinner deeply to heart, and her book is as much urgent reassessment as historical re-creation. The brilliant chapter on David Rosenhan's experiment, in which volunteers presented vague symptoms at psychiatric facilities and were immediately admitted, proving that the diagnosis of "mental illness" is a largely contextual affair, is the most flamboyant and revealing example of Slater's method. She is not only frank about her own experiences as a patient in psychiatric institutions but-as she does elsewhere-she reproduces the experiment personally. That Slater-after an average office visit of less than a quarter-hour-is prescribed a variety of drugs rather than being locked up does show a change in clinical methodology, but confirms Rosenhan's thesis. This combination of expert scientific and historical context, tough-minded reporting and daringly subjective re-creation serves to illuminate and humanize a sometimes arcane subject. If this leads to occasionally florid prose, and a chapter on "repressed memory" scourge Elizabeth Loftus in which Slater's ambivalence shades toward outright hostility, this is still one of the most informative and readable recent books on psychology.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
"What if?" Perhaps no two words have had a greater capacity for motivating explorers and experimenters to delve into the unknown. When posed by some of the twentieth century's most famous psychologists, this tiny question has yielded tremendous results. From B. F. Skinner's notorious study of behaviorism to Alexander's controversial analysis of addiction, 10 of psychology's most audacious experiments are revisited in Slater's fascinating investigation. The study of human nature, psychology is paradoxically reported in dispassionate terms, its cold objectivity exacting great personal costs. Slater, a psychologist who has written extensively about her own treatments for mental illness--most memorably in Prozac Diary (1998)--wanted to change all that, to reconnect with the patients and physicians who contributed so significantly to our understanding of human behavior. Passionately and poetically, she humanizes the calculating inspiration and inhumane consequences such experimentation conferred. At times facile, even glib, Slater is nonetheless grounded in her research and conclusions and does succeed in bringing a refreshingly honest, and human, perspective to an all-too-often detached clinical science. Carol Haggas
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Inside This Book(Learn More)
Top Customer Reviews
Unfortunately, OSB seems to belong to the genre of new journalism, a light sweep of the landscape rather than in-depth analysis. Slater reviewed a series of ten experiments, then followed up by interviewing anyone she could find who was connected to those experiments. She seems to seek an ordinary person's perspective, a way to make these experiments accessible to laypersons.
But anyone who's taught doctoral students can verify that making science accessible isn't easy or, in some cases, desirable. When Slater questions whether these lab studies really tell us about human nature, or report isolated atypical situations, she's questioning external validity -- a subject that merits a session or two of a graduate seminar and one that deserves more attention here.
Rather than translate scientific method for the benefit of the layperson, Slater tries to adapt the layperson's perspective. And I'm not sure what we gain.
I believe we give up considerable understanding when we drop the scientific perspective. For instance, Slater reports that 25% of Loftus's subjects were quite willing to create false memories. Only 25%? The scary part isn't the statistic. It's that we don't know if a recovered-memory lawsuit is being brought by one of the 25% or by the 75% who presumably remember accurately. And it's scary to believe that police can convince some suggestible people that they did certain things.
I know little about these experiments, but I have read enough about Milgram's studies to know that Slater gives us an incomplete account and explanation.Read more ›
But there is an edge to Slater's prose. She dwells on the horrific: the lobotomies, the monkeys being abused for the experimenter's purposes, the living rats with their brains exposed... She does/doesn't believe that the means of animal experimentation justifies the ends of neurological knowledge. This dialectic that she holds in her mind, now favoring the value of experimental psychology, now questioning it, may leave the reader dissatisfied and confused. Where DOES Lauren Slater stand? She says she stands "with this book" for which there is no conclusion, even though she writes a concluding chapter with that title.
So it is not so strange that among these "great psychological experiments" she finds nothing like solid ground. Instead she waffles between experimenter and experiment, between one interpretation and another. And while she addresses the experiments themselves and the controversies they raised, more significantly she addresses the experimenters themselves, challenges them with sharp and sometimes impertinent questions; and when the experimenters are not available, she finds relatives or friends and fires loaded questions at them. Slater wants to find the truth, if possible, and to be fair; but often what she finds is that she doesn't know what the truth is, and that life is oh, so complex.
This is refreshing and of course disconcerting.Read more ›
This could be a metaphor for the irreverent manner in which Slater proceeds to violate the sanctity and decorum of modern psychology with her ensuing discussion of psychological experimentation in the 20th century. Jumping through topics such as the heinous liberties taken by experimenters, repressed memories, drug addiction, and lobotomies Slater morphs fluidly between reporter, guinea pig and devils' advocate to show us that as much as we want to be able to explain our psychological processes in neat, categorical terms; right vs. wrong, black or white - the study of our gray matter is alas, just that - gray, and the field of Psychology is not as much of a "science" as the stuffy academics would have us believe.
And as if her commentary itself might not ruffle enough feathers in academia, she deep-sixes the clinical and objective writing style one might consider appropriate for such a topic, and instead brings the subject matter to life with a humorous and whimsical style - mixing factual reporting with cultural commentary and personal musings about why we humans behave the way we do.
Overall, an entertaining, well-written and thought provoking look at experimental psychology in the last century. Highly recommended!
Most recent customer reviews
As a professor of psychology (both grad and undergrad) I have long sought out texts that reflect and expand upon the major trends in psychological literature. Read morePublished on July 18 2004
I am a practicing psychiatrist so it was with great anticipation that I picked up this much discussed book. I was not dissapointed. Read morePublished on June 29 2004
This type of book needed to be done, but this foray into the "real" people and ideas behind the most influential psychological experiments is entirely disappointing. Read morePublished on June 28 2004 by L H
Lauren Slater is one of the best writers on psychology in America today. This is fitting as Slater herself has experienced her share of psychological trauma. Read morePublished on June 24 2004 by Charles J. Rector
This text had such potential--it was entertaining, certainly, which can help interest people in psychological science. Read morePublished on June 24 2004 by Bryan
The controversy this book has generated in the scientific community makes sense when you read this book. Read morePublished on June 22 2004
Slater's engaging prose style is squandered here on a poorly researched, poorly argued look at some famous psychological experiments of the past. Read morePublished on June 21 2004
There's been a lot of controversy about this book regarding the veracity of some of its claims. However, it appears that most of the criticms are from various psychologists who... Read morePublished on June 1 2004 by Amazon Customer
After reading how controversial Opening Skinner's Box is, I had to read the book myself. Some of the people interviewed in the book are claiming to have been incorrectly quoted,... Read morePublished on May 31 2004 by takingadayoff