2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
Sadly structured, Mar 24 2006
I'm not sure where to begin.
The beginning of Picasso's War is largely about the Spanish Civil War, and eventually the destruction of the town of Guernica. Previously I knew next to nothing about the Spanish Civil War and I found this material very interesting.
Then Martin begins to move towards Picasso and his painting. Initially this is fairly interesting, but honestly, it doesn't go anywhere interesting, and the last half of the book - which covers the end of Picasso's life, the bickering about where the painting should be kept, and about the effect of the war on the Spanish people, as seen through the lens of Martin's friend, Angel, is really terrible.
An initial problem with this book is that it was published just about a year after 9/11, when everyone in the arts was trying to create art/literature etc which somehow incorporated 9/11. In Picasso's War this is done in a corny way with Martin's assertion that he was looking at Guernica when the planes hit on 9/11.
A 2nd problem with this book is that Martin is the type of sad writer who tries to make every sentence and paragraph pregnant with emotion and meaning. Every time Picasso dips his paintbrush into ink, every time Franco's group denies bombing Guernica, every time someone berates fascism, it is written as though it's the greatest symbol of the battle between life and death and light and dark that ever existed.
SO... this is what should have been done. Martin's editors should have stolen this idea from him and kicked him off the project. They should have hired a good historian to write the book and given him 75 pages to do it. They should have said "here's the format:
a) Picasso's life up to 1937, and how he revolutionized art.
b) The spanish civil war - it's origins and main players.
c) The bombing of Guernica.
d) Picasso's response to the bombing by painting Guernica.
e) Guernica's effect upon the world of art and politics - how it stands up today.
DONE! FINISHED!
Not 100 pages of overblown writing about the noble spanish people and how the painting finally ended up in Spain.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book for a Light Read On Picasso, May 31 2004
The book as a whole was rather well written, and, if someone asked me for a good nonfiction book about Picasso, there is a good chance that I would point them to this book. The book had good descriptions throughout, it was written for so that people who had very little understanding previously could understand what was going on, and the book was written so that it didn't have to be read all in one sitting. So, while I probably wouldn't pass it onto others, I feel that it was a good experience to read it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good discussion - Visuals lacking, April 13 2004
Picasso's War untangles much of the criticism of the artist during WWII for remaining in France. It is an excellent discussion of Guernica--the paintings beginning as rough sketches to the final product. The tragedy at Gernica is discribed vividly, putting the reader at the scene. Martin's take on Picasso is balanced--his outstanding talent and chauvenism toward his many women are discussed. My criticism of the book lies with the total lack of illustrations. As an artist I wanted to see pictures of the initial sketches, the painting in process and a good reproduction of Guernica, not just what was on the cover. The lack of illustrations makes the book much less effective for a visual person, artist or art historian.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No