Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here

Rake's Progress [Blu-ray] [Import]

Blu-ray
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
List Price: CDN$ 47.99
Price: CDN$ 44.20 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
You Save: CDN$ 3.79 (8%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Monday, May 27? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.

Product Details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Customer Reviews

4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
5.0 out of 5 stars
5.0 out of 5 stars
Most helpful customer reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Well done revival of modern classic! Feb 14 2012
By Daniel R. Coombs TOP 500 REVIEWER
Format:DVD
Stravinsky's A Rake's Progress is based on a libretto by W.H. Auden which, in turn, is based on the series of satirical prints by English artist and engraver William Hogarth from1735. In concept, Hogarth's work was the earliest form of "graphic novel" and his artwork is largely pen and ink line drawing. The storyline itself is a pretty easy to follow "morality play". The principal character, the young Tom Rakewell, is a young, good looking free spirit who is attracted to Anne Trulove and wishes to marry her. Anne's father questions Tom's lack of professional determination and displays some paternal hesitancy about Tom's desires. Enter a courier, Nick Shadow, with the news that Tom's all but forgotten uncle has passed away; leaving Tom a great fortune.

Shadow takes Tom to London to sign paperwork to inherit his new wealth but, along the way, Nick introduces Tom to the distractions of the big city; including prostitutes, clothiers and many other earthly sources of blowing his money. In a critical - and highly symbolic and satirical - scene Anne tracks down Tom who ends up rebuking her by announcing that he is marrying Baba the Turk who seduces well but is also a bearded lady who is quite possessive! Tom ends up challenging Nick Shadow to win back Anne and start over in a card game that Tom does end up winning. Nick - who we infer is actually the Devil - gets revenge by making Tom insane. Rakewell spends his last days in an asylum thinking that he is Adonis and that his lost love, Anne, is Venus. He dies poor, loveless and witless.

Hogarth used lithography as a medium to make social points (having written and drawn other such stories like "A Harlot's Progress" and "The Stages of Cruelty"). Auden's libretto uses the same approach but with a little more humor; coming mainly from the Baba character. Stravinsky's opera was not an initial success and is still performed only sparingly. Seen as too "modern" for the 1953 Sussex crowd it was written for; too "conservative" for those expecting Stravinsky the modernist.

This production is quite good, though, and invites revisiting the opera as one of Stravinsky's greatest achievements. Musically, this is Stravinsky in neo-Baroque form with echoes of Pulcinella and Apollon Musagête throughout. There are some very nice arias for Anne and Tom that certainly do resemble Rameau more than Puccini. The score is crisp and accented and attractive but spare. Written in three acts from nine scenes taken from the Hogarth prints, the play moves compactly and nothing lingers any longer than plot acuity demands. Musically, I feel this is a different Stravinsky from The Firebird to be sure but beautiful and attention keeping none the less.

The performances in this production are terrific. All principals in this fairly small cast are great but special kudos go to the young Finnish tenor, Topi Lehtipuu, as a nearly idiomatic Tom Rakewell and to Matthew Rose as the slimy and convincing Nick Shadow. The forces of the London Philharmonic (downsized) and the Glyndebourne Chorus play wonderfully under the young Russian and LPO music director Vladimir Jurowski. Juroswki's conducting is captivating unto itself with an angularity but crisp clarity that befit this music perfectly.

The production by renowned artist David Hockney is another reason to check out this production. Commissioned by John Cox in 1975, the set, costumes and backdrop all look - as Cox admits - a bit "off-kilter" but in a visually arresting way. Hockney uses the original Hogarth drawings with their pen-and-ink look to give a "drawn" appearance to everything from trees to buildings to clothing to masks on the chorus. Each scene is practically a lithograph itself. I first saw Hockney as a stage designer in Puccini's Turandot and became enthralled. This is a wholly different view than that work but equally amazing in my view.

If you have never heard nor seen The Rake's Progress, this production offers a very satisfying first glance. If you already know it, you may welcome a very visually unusual perception and with a great performance by Topi Lehtipuu.
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.8 out of 5 stars  6 reviews
18 of 18 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars David Hockney's classic Glyndebourne production Dec 21 2011
By Keris Nine - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Blu-ray
Few productions seem so perfectly matched and strike such a perfect balance between the intentions of the opera work and its presentation on the stage as David Hockney's designs for the classic Glyndebourne production of Igor Stravinsky's The Rake's Progress. The measure of the success of the production is that it was first put on at Glyndebourne in 1975 and, as this 2010 performance at the festival shows, it is still delighting and wowing audiences thirty-five years later and will no doubt continue to be revived for many more years. There aren't many productions that have that kind of staying power. A modern artist surely not to everyone's taste, one might expect something relatively avant-garde from David Hockney when called upon to design the set for a 20th century opera, but in reality, his approach almost perfectly mirrors Stravinsky's method of composition for The Rake's Progress. Seeking inspiration directly from the source of William Hogarth original drawings made in the 1730s, Hockney's sets reproduce the intricate cross-hatching in bold, colourful strokes on flat board backdrops - a modern interpretation of a classical design.

It works so well because, after all, that's exactly what Stravinsky's opera does also. Composed in 1951, the composer working in the neo-classical form (before he moved on to serial composition), The Rake's Progress accordingly plays to the conventions of the 18th century opera. Classically structured into three acts, with three scenes in each, Stravinsky's 20th century composition even uses recitative with harpsichord continuo and da capo arias in his treatment of a subject that has many resonances with Mozart's operas. Since it wears its references openly, the names of the characters even reflecting their types - Tom Rakewell leaving behind his beloved Anne Trulove on the instigation of his demonic alter-ego Nick Shadow for a life of dissolution in London - The Rake's Progress can be an opera that is easier to admire more than to really love. It's all very clever but a little dull and constricting, and the opera can consequently be a little static when performed.

There are however compensating factors that prevent The Rake's Progress from being merely a pastiche that is too clever for its own good, not least of which is a beautiful libretto by W.H. Auden and Chester Kallman and some fascinating arrangements by Stravinsky, but what this particular Glyndebourne production has going for it is of course the production by David Hockney and John Cox. Every scene is an absolute delight, breathtaking in some places, with marvellous little touches that bring out the humour of the situations well. Vladimir Jurowski treats the opera very much as a Russian work, while being mindful of its English and international aspects. These are brought out fully in the casting and the singing, which is of fine quality throughout, with Miah Persson and Topi Lehtipuu demonstrating perfect English diction. If their acting performances are unremarkable and a little static, it's probably more a failing with the nature of the opera itself - but there are enough compensating factors in the singing, the staging and the performance to make this a highly entertaining experience.

Depending on your set-up, there might be some minor aliasing in the costumes, but the transfer copes well with all the cross-hatching. Otherwise, the full impact of the colourful production is visible in the High Definition transfer and in the actual filming. The LPCM Stereo and DTS HD-Master Audio 5.1 tracks capture the detail of the musical performance brilliantly and dynamically. Extra features include a Cast Gallery, a brief Introduction to the Rake's Progress that contains recent interviews with Hockney and Cox about the production, and a wider look at the opera in a 12-minute Behind the Rake's Progress featurette.
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A Brillian Recreation Feb 20 2012
By DDD - Published on Amazon.com
Format:DVD|Amazon Verified Purchase
The newest entry into the Rake's Progress line up of DVD's is from Glyndebourne, the house that fielded the first video back in 1975. Of course it is not the same stage since the house was rebuilt and the stage enlarged and seating increased to around 1000. The decision to recreate the 1975 production was, I think, appropriate as Hockney's mise-en-scene captured the essence of Stravinsky's recreation of the 18th century style, his neo-classical style.

The 1975 staging was notable for the beginning of Felicity Lott's career and the debut of Sam Ramey as Nick Shadow. Both are superb and Lott went on to have a major career almost immediately. Ramey bided his time at City Opera inheriting Norman Treigle's roles and eventually landing at the Met. Rakewell was sung by Leo Geoke who is featured into other Glndebourne DVD's, Magic Flute and Don Giovanni. The voice is small and he is best described as adequate. Even so the set is well worth acquiring for Ramey and Lott.

The new set has no weak links in the three major roles. Tom is sung by the Finnish tenor, Topi Lehtipuu, the Ann by Swedish soprano, Miah Persson. Both are excellent and their diction is exemplary. Nick Shadow is sung by Matthew Rose; he is as good as Ramey although the two interpretations are quite different. The orchestra in both cases is the London Philharmonic, conducted by Haitink in 1975 and Jurowski in the current investiture. I would imagine there have been a great many personnel changes over the years.

For those who have resisted taking the plunge in a "modern" opera the Rake is a good place to begin since Stravinsky utilized forms that should be known to most opera lovers, recitatives and arias, duets and ensembles;. There is considerably melody but it does take repeated listening to discover it but one is repaid. The test by Kallman and Auden is one of the great librettos written in the last half of the 20th century and Stravinksy set it flawlessly.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Well done revival of modern classic! Feb 14 2012
By Daniel R. Coombs - Published on Amazon.com
Format:DVD
Stravinsky's A Rake's Progress is based on a libretto by W.H. Auden which, in turn, is based on the series of satirical prints by English artist and engraver William Hogarth from1735. In concept, Hogarth's work was the earliest form of "graphic novel" and his artwork is largely pen and ink line drawing. The storyline itself is a pretty easy to follow "morality play". The principal character, the young Tom Rakewell, is a young, good looking free spirit who is attracted to Anne Trulove and wishes to marry her. Anne's father questions Tom's lack of professional determination and displays some paternal hesitancy about Tom's desires. Enter a courier, Nick Shadow, with the news that Tom's all but forgotten uncle has passed away; leaving Tom a great fortune.

Shadow takes Tom to London to sign paperwork to inherit his new wealth but, along the way, Nick introduces Tom to the distractions of the big city; including prostitutes, clothiers and many other earthly sources of blowing his money. In a critical - and highly symbolic and satirical - scene Anne tracks down Tom who ends up rebuking her by announcing that he is marrying Baba the Turk who seduces well but is also a bearded lady who is quite possessive! Tom ends up challenging Nick Shadow to win back Anne and start over in a card game that Tom does end up winning. Nick - who we infer is actually the Devil - gets revenge by making Tom insane. Rakewell spends his last days in an asylum thinking that he is Adonis and that his lost love, Anne, is Venus. He dies poor, loveless and witless.

Hogarth used lithography as a medium to make social points (having written and drawn other such stories like "A Harlot's Progress" and "The Stages of Cruelty"). Auden's libretto uses the same approach but with a little more humor; coming mainly from the Baba character. Stravinsky's opera was not an initial success and is still performed only sparingly. Seen as too "modern" for the 1953 Sussex crowd it was written for; too "conservative" for those expecting Stravinsky the modernist.

This production is quite good, though, and invites revisiting the opera as one of Stravinsky's greatest achievements. Musically, this is Stravinsky in neo-Baroque form with echoes of Pulcinella and Apollon Musagête throughout. There are some very nice arias for Anne and Tom that certainly do resemble Rameau more than Puccini. The score is crisp and accented and attractive but spare. Written in three acts from nine scenes taken from the Hogarth prints, the play moves compactly and nothing lingers any longer than plot acuity demands. Musically, I feel this is a different Stravinsky from The Firebird to be sure but beautiful and attention keeping none the less.

The performances in this production are terrific. All principals in this fairly small cast are great but special kudos go to the young Finnish tenor, Topi Lehtipuu, as a nearly idiomatic Tom Rakewell and to Matthew Rose as the slimy and convincing Nick Shadow. The forces of the London Philharmonic (downsized) and the Glyndebourne Chorus play wonderfully under the young Russian and LPO music director Vladimir Jurowski. Juroswki's conducting is captivating unto itself with an angularity but crisp clarity that befit this music perfectly.

The production by renowned artist David Hockney is another reason to check out this production. Commissioned by John Cox in 1975, the set, costumes and backdrop all look - as Cox admits - a bit "off-kilter" but in a visually arresting way. Hockney uses the original Hogarth drawings with their pen-and-ink look to give a "drawn" appearance to everything from trees to buildings to clothing to masks on the chorus. Each scene is practically a lithograph itself. I first saw Hockney as a stage designer in Puccini's Turandot and became enthralled. This is a wholly different view than that work but equally amazing in my view.

If you have never heard nor seen The Rake's Progress, this production offers a very satisfying first glance. If you already know it, you may welcome a very visually unusual perception and with a great performance by Topi Lehtipuu.
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Feedback


Amazon.ca Privacy Statement Amazon.ca Shipping Information Amazon.ca Returns & Exchanges