Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Red Scare or Red Menace?: American Communism and Anticommunism in the Cold War Era
 
See larger image
 

Red Scare or Red Menace?: American Communism and Anticommunism in the Cold War Era [Paperback]

John Earl Haynes

List Price: CDN$ 15.95
Price: CDN$ 13.95 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details
You Save: CDN$ 2.00 (13%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Only 1 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).
Want it delivered Tuesday, May 29? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.

Product Details


Product Description

From Publishers Weekly

According to Haynes, manuscript historian at the Library of Congress, the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA)?whose membership purportedly never exceeded 70,000?was a definite threat to American security. Newly opened Russian archives reveal, for instance, that the CPUSA worked directly with Soviet intelligence officer Vasily Zubilin, who supervised the theft of atomic bomb secrets, and that the CPUSA, which was financed by Moscow, also provided recruits for Soviet intelligence agencies engaged in espionage against the U.S. Outlining reasons for the party's decline after its peak in the 1940s, Haynes cites the failure of Henry Wallace's Progressive Party presidential campaign in 1948, Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin and the massive FBI penetration of the CPUSA. Controversially, Haynes concludes that, despite its excesses during the McCarthy era, the anticommunism of the '40s and '50s was not entirely irrational, given the links between the CPUSA and Soviet espionage.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

From Library Journal

In 1992, historian Haynes (affiliated with the Library of Congress) was granted access to Soviet archival materials on the American Communist party. He argues in this book that the Soviet Union virtually controlled the activities of the party in the United States, and therefore the party posed a serious threat to U.S. internal security. He documents cases of Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and concludes that Alger Hiss was indeed a Soviet spy and that the party had a hand in stealing secret U.S. atom bomb information during World War II. While Haynes concentrates on Communist activity during the 1940s and 1950s, he also examines the origins of American communism and the key events leading up to?and influencing?the Cold War. More important, Haynes documents the major anti-Communist activities of the period?chiefly within Congress and the labor movement. Even though this is not an exhaustive history of American communism, it will provoke a rethinking of recent U.S. history. Recommended for academic libraries.?Thomas A. Karel, Franklin & Marshall Coll. Lib., Lancaster, Pa.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
Share your experience with this product with others
Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 5.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars More Balanced Than You'd Think, May 28 2010
By Doctor D "Doctor D" - Published on Amazon.com
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Red Scare or Red Menace?: American Communism and Anticommunism in the Cold War Era (Paperback)
I think that liberals would find this book informative. Haynes gives considerable credit to the post-WW II left and organized labor for preventing communists from establishing any insitutional foothold in American society. Unlike others, who in simplistic fashion, dismiss the American left during the late 1940s to mid 50s as being "soft" on communism, Haynes provides a detailed analysis of the efforts of anti-communist liberals to root out the "popular fronters" which in part were members of the CPUSA. Personally, I'm a conservative but somewhat weary of the wholesale bashing of the entire left by the likes of Hannity, Limbaugh, and the rest. By giving the liberals due credit in the fight against communisim, Haynes elevates and legitimizes anti-communism.

That's just one aspect of this brief but very fruitful work. In line with his other writings, he continues to demonstrate that the threat of communisim was real and severe following World War II and not the product of hysteria. He does, however, separate some fact from fiction. For example, despite the presence of communists in the film industry, Haynes concludes that they were not particularly successful in producing much in the way of meaningful propaganda. He also provides a rather comprehensive discussion of the causes of anti-communism during the early stages of the Cold War and separates fact from fiction.

While discussing communism as a real threat, Haynes does not glorify Joseph McCarthy in the process. As William F. Buckley once noted, McCarthy could be summed up as being the "wrong messenger with the right message." He also takes the G.O.P. to task for making anti-communism a partisan issue but does conclude in the end that they were instrumental in exposing Hiss and the Rosenbergs.

Early in his discussion, Haynes provides a very interesting juxtaposition of how we dealt with the issue of a feared Nazi fifth column in America during the war years with the effort to root out communists in the aftermath. He concludes that many of the same people who cried "witch hunt" during the McCarthy era were extremely tolerant of wholesale civil rights violations of those who were both rightfully and wrongfully accused of being sympathetic to Hitler and Germany.

Although only employing two hundred pages of text, Haynes has provided a very rich, fact-based book that is not only informative but an inviting read. Conservatives will, by inclination, gravitate to this work, but I think that liberals would be well-served to examine it as well.

5.0 out of 5 stars "RED MENACE", Oct 27 2011
By oswegodon - Published on Amazon.com
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Red Scare or Red Menace?: American Communism and Anticommunism in the Cold War Era (Paperback)
If you know any unreconstructed lefties out there who still think Alger Hiss was innocent buy this and send it to them (after you've read it of course).

The Venona Papers, the papers of the Communist Party-USA, and the KGB files, all of which came out in teh late 90's, have made the correction of history for the cold War era a cottage industry for my Haynes and his co-author Harvey Klehr. They have at least five original works, to date, setting the record straight once and for all.

There are still those out there who are in denial.
 Go to Amazon.com to see both reviews  5.0 out of 5 stars 

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback


Amazon.ca Privacy Statement Amazon.ca Shipping Information Amazon.ca Returns & Exchanges