1.0 out of 5 stars
red and the white, Feb 15 2012
What a garbage. The quality is under any decent level, and the story is very boring, and stupid. No wonder, that this movie in unknown to everybody..Waste of money. I put my copy into the garbage..
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Vast and breathtaking, Feb 5 2004
Like Ingmar Bergman's amazing film "Shame" (produced in the same year as "The Red and the White", 1968), Miklos Jancsó's masterpiece evokes the vast and breathtaking panaroma of civil war on a small scale. No crashing, thundering armies here, and no heroes -- just murder on both sides. No plot, no easy resolution, no ideology -- just the tension and menace of a venomous snake uncoiling in the sun.
At the center of the movie is a group of Hungarian volunteers who have come to Russia to fight for the Bolsheviks, either in 1919 or 1920. Caught in an abandoned monastery by a battalion of the counter-revolutionary, pro-Tsarist White Army, the Hungarians are let loose, in an apparent gesture of mercy, then hunted down while they scramble along the banks of the Volga futilely trying to escape. No mercy is shown to anyone on either side. Some of the Hungarians eventually meet up with a Red Army battalion, which is wiped out in a quixotic, unforgettable mini-battle with the Whites along the river. From beginning to end, Jancsó squeezes every last drop of "beauty" out of war. Moreover, his refusal to romanticize the Bolshevik struggle in the Russian Revolution led to this film being banned by the Soviets for years.
Visually, "The Red and the White" is absolute eye candy. Jancsó's genius, like Bergman's, is that he recognized the value of silence. As E.E. Cummings put it, "Nothing can surpass the mystery of stillness." There are whole scenes of this movie where the crickets and the grass say more than the people involved. And arguably, the Volga is a major figure in the film, the spectacular and flowing symbol of Mother Russia, a snake more lasting than violence and one that will outlive every blood-letting combatant her banks.
This is a dreamy and labyrinthine masterpiece. Get it. Five stars.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent but you need to know the history to appreciate it!, Nov 17 2002
By A Customer
This movie kept me at the edge of my seat the whole film! The reason being, prior to viewing the movie I had read quite a bit on the Russian Civil War and I knew more or less what to expect (mass executions, no mercy given to either side, etc.). On a whole the film appears historically accurate. However, I found some parts hard to believe. The "cat and mouse" scene strikes me as being highly unlikely because the White Army was advancing on Moscow - they had little time to chase prisoners (which they had just released!) all over the countryside. Not to mention it made no sense to waste ammunition (especially grenades) in that pursuit, because such supplies were very limited and needed to be conserved. Other than that, at an aesthetic level, it is a very beautiful film. The shots are crisp and the rolling countrysides are amazing to take in (even though the film is in black and white!). Also, they did a great job with the dress for both sides - the Whites with their clean officer uniforms and the Reds with their mismatched papakha outfits. Great for the military modeler or wargamer! The film ended somewhat abruptly, but if you think about it, you know how the rest of the story goes, so it ends up being anti-climactic in a way. It does however leave you longing for a Red and the White II, complete with large battle scenes and, of course, more action.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No