|New from||Used from|
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
The only boring aspect of this book is its title, which doesn't do justice to apologist Kreeft's intelligent, engaging dialogue between two fictional friends during a week of relaxation at Martha's Vineyard. Kreeft, philosophy professor at Boston College and author of more than 25 books, describes the absolutist character 'Isa as a Muslim fundamentalist from Palestine who teaches philosophy at the American University in Beirut. His interviewer and sparring partner is Libby Rawls, an African-American, liberal feminist journalist. Using a classic debate format, with impressive fairness to the opposite side, Kreeft defines relativism and its importance. Tracing relativism's evolution and history in Western philosophy, Kreeft notes that relativism is a fairly modern perspective, originating within the last few hundred years. He outlines the philosophical distinctions between it and absolutism with clarity and an integrity that will delight both the layperson and the professional philosopher. For Kreeft, relativism has eroded a collective and individual sense of accountability and contributed to social decay, yet he can see the other side, especially with regard to cross-cultural differences. Although the purpose of the book is to uphold absolutism, Kreeft outlines the relativist perspective in an approachable, respectful manner. By giving counterarguments a fighting chance, this becomes a book that may actually persuade peopleAnot just preach to the absolutist choir. (Nov.)
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Philosophy professor Kreeft's conceit is that he recently invited two former students (both fictional) to discuss moral philosophy and that this is the record of their conversations. One of the two, a black feminist journalist and moral relativist, interviewed the other, a Palestinian Arab professor and moral absolutist. The sparks start flying in the first session, when the professor characterizes Auschwitz as "the fruit of moral relativism" and quotes Mussolini's explanation of fascism as quintessentially relativistic. The succeeding discussion treats the definition and the history of moral relativism (it began with the serpent's temptation of Eve, it seems), whether data support relativism or absolutism, the arguments for relativism, the roots of relativism in reductionism, arguments for moral absolutism, absolutism's philosophical assumptions (e.g., that truth can be known), and, finally, "The Cause and Cure of Relativism" (sexual mores are key to both). As the title suggests, relativism doesn't stand a chance here. Boredom is a goner, too, as, employing the oldest literary method of enlivening philosophy--casting it, ... ala Plato, as a dialogue, a bare-bones play--Kreeft deftly creates recognizable characters as he advances a debate as important to the future of religion as to that of society. Ray Olson
In terms of craft, this is a pretty thin piece of work. Kreeft probably thinks he's walking some kind of tightrope of "political correctness" by pitting an ethical "relativist"... Read morePublished on July 18 2004 by Amazon Customer
Prof. Kreeft has 'demolished' moral relativism by showing it leads to contradictions. What's new here? It is easy to show that moral relativism is contradictory. Read morePublished on March 14 2004 by William B. Starr
The answer to my question is: reputable publishers don't. Again Peter Kreeft bores us with his adolescent sense of humor, irritates us with his sophomoric oversimplifications, and... Read morePublished on Oct. 16 2003
My first sample of this writer's exposition, and I am an avowed "fan". Actually got this book from my local library, read it a bunch of times, referred to it frequently in debates... Read morePublished on May 8 2003 by Bruce Ware
Having never read any of Kreeft's books before, I started with this one, since it was an interesting subject. I had to give up about 3/4s through because it was just so awful. Read morePublished on Jan. 2 2003
One of the best modern Catholic authors writes another great book. Kreeft's style is unique to most reader's not introduced to the Socratic method of dialogue. Read morePublished on Dec 17 2002 by Marcel LeJeune
This book, as with all of Kreeft's endeavors, is great. He is the best there is out there--fully orthodox and capable of beating modernists and post-modernists at their own game. Read morePublished on Dec 6 2002 by C. J. Gawley
Reading Kreeft's book, I now understand how civilizations become undone. For those of us who don't want to become losers, this is an important book on a pressing subject.Published on May 11 2002