Most helpful customer reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Religion and Science, Feb 5 2003
Ce commentaire est de: Religion and Science (Paperback)
I really enjoyed this book. Basically this is a history book of science and religion and how they have interacted over the history of mankind. Bertrand explains how almost every great scientific finding or revolution is oppressed ...by religion in some way or another. Copernicus, Newton, Galileo, Darwin, Vesalius, Harvey, Simpson, and many other distinguished scholars have all been at least fearful of the reactions of the churches, but also of the general population. Bertrand also goes into detail how the idea of ?soul? has changed through time: ?We not only react to external objects, but we know that we react. The stone, we think, does not know it reacts, but if it does it has ?consciousness.? Here also, on analysis, the difference will be found to be one of degree.? I rate this book with five out of five stars; I enjoyed it and still do enjoy it thoroughly.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good introduction, somewhat out-of-date, July 25 2011
Ce commentaire est de: Religion and Science (Paperback)
Even though it's over 75 years old by now, this little book by Russell is still a very good introduction to the history of science and religion. Russell observes how at pretty much every juncture, the religious authorities (whom he categorizes as sadistic and misogynistic) stifled advances in science that contradicted their dogma. While couched in theological arguments, their motivations were actually more influenced by the fact that science put their authority into question. And anything that puts an authoritarian's rule into question must be eradicated. While he was writing of the past, Russell nonetheless saw the same forces at work at the time of writing, stating that communism and fascism became "the inheritors of theological bigotry." And indeed, it seems these same dynamics are at play today. That's where I think Russell's analysis falls short. As Michael Ruse points out in the introduction, the book is a little out of date. The 'conflict' hasn't so much been a monolithic one of "science" vs. "religion". In my opinion, it has more to do with the psychology behind these impulses: one of open-mindedness and free discovery, and one of brute totalitarian rule. While religion has definitely typified the latter for its entire history, the worldview can also apply to secular institutions, as Russell noted. The identity of the problem isn't clearly defined here. I think David Ray Griffin's summary of Whitehead's views on the subject, as well as his own analysis on the circumstances surrounding the main players in the 'conflict' and the forces at play that left 'science' victorious gets closer to the heart of the matter (see Whitehead's Radically Different Postmodern Philosophy: An Argument for Its Contemporary Relevence). The battle was a political one, and competing 'religious' worldviews suffered just as much as 'science'. Griffin also presents a more coherent metaphysic than Russell's materialism, for what it's worth. As for a more current take on the subject, I recommend Thomas Dixon's volume, Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
Two Titans' Battle is Reviewed by Capable Hands, April 26 2004
Ce commentaire est de: Religion and Science (Paperback)
Quick overview of the centuries long conflict between religion and science. Russell firmly believes that religion has stood in the natural path of science on multiple fronts. Every time religion has been "pushed aside" by science (sometimes violently), man has made tremendous progressive strides. This includes discovering that blood flows through the body and the failure to find the soul within the body, amongst dozens of other examples. The book's age takes very little away from the book. Russell even acknowledges that the fields of science he speaks about are still progressing and his words about them will one day be less poignant. Fascinating and quick, I read "S&R" after "The Problems of Philosophy" and "The Conquest of Happiness," but before "Why I Am Not a Christian."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|