Most helpful customer reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
O.K., I'm biased, but I had to check in., Jun 6 2003
This review is from: Richard The Third (Paperback)
Since I'm Paul Murray Kendall's daughter, and since I wrote the introduction to this edition, my predilection for my father's meticulous scholarship and his way of making biography come alive, is obvious. This book, however (my favoritism aside), has corrected a multitude of misconceptions about Richard -- and, though I say it, the book's a good read. I just couldn't help writing this.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
Richard vindicated?, Sep 5 2007
This review is from: Richard The Third (Paperback)
I have read this book twice, once when I was very young and again now when I'm not so young! I also especially enjoyed this edition with its interesting forward by Mr.Kendall's daughter. It is an eminently readable book which clarifies some of the slander against Richard. I don't think Richard was a totally innocent person but was a product of his time - which means that some of his methods were not what we would expect from a King - but were quite the norm in the 15th century. Paul Kendall was a wonderful writer who researched his data in great depth. I look forward to the day when Richard is not thought of as Shakespeare would have us see him, but as a King that did his best as he saw it, for his people and country. Bye the way Shakespeare's play of Richard 111 is wonderful especially the film with Lawrence Olivier, but History it is not! I would recommend this book and Mr. Kendall's others to anyone interested in this period of history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
Richard III as a man....., Feb 8 2004
This review is from: Richard The Third (Paperback)
Personally speaking, I thought this was a well written and well researched biography that must be on mandatory reading list for anyone intersting in the life and time of King Richard III. However, it should be noted that the author proves to be very sympathic in nature toward Richard and although he does his best to clear all the Shakespearean myths about Richard, it could be said that he probably went too far in some cases in creating a Richard that may be too good. In one case, the case of the missing and presumably murdered Princes in the Tower, Kendall does go all out to proves Richard's innoence. I can lived with that but Kendall failed to realized why so many believed that Richard had a hand in it. Why? Well....the Princes disappeared as he took power and never seen again after he did. Sure, Henry Tudor could have done it and host of many, but like Edward II, Richard II and Henry VI, these princes were rightly considered as the direct threat to reigning ruler's throne which was bit shaky to begin with. Their termination would be logical, necessary and poltically acute - even in our time period. I think Kendall was one of the movers of the Richard the Innocent Man concept regarding the Princes' murders. Many books have been written to back him up or to condemn him. Just for that, the book needs to be read and enjoyed. Kendall proves to be an excellent writer, good historian and got a sense of justice even if you don't agreed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|