STATE OF DISOBEDIENCE Mass Market Paperback – Aug 1 2005
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
"Probably the most realistic depiction of a second American Revolution ever written."
About the Author
In 1974, at age seventeen, Tom Kratman became a political refugee and defector from the PRM (People's Republic of Massachusetts) by virtue of joining the Regular Army. He stayed a Regular Army infantryman most of his adult life, returning to Massachusetts as an unofficial dissident while attending Boston College after his first hitch. Back in the Army, he managed to do just about everything there was to do, at one time or another. After the Gulf War, and with the bottom dropping completely out of the anti-communism market, Tom decided to become a lawyer. (Big mistake, way big. Chilluns don't do it.) Every now and again, when the frustrations of legal life and having to deal with other lawyers got to be too much, Tom would rejoin the Army (or a somewhat similar group, say) for fun and frolic in other climes. His family, muttering darkly, still puts up with this. Tom is currently an attorney practicing in southwest Virginia. A State of Disobedience is his first novel.
Top Customer Reviews
In summation: Liberal = BAD, Conservative = GOOD, and rewriting the constitution to reflect whatever immediate idiocy captures our attention is the best way to insure more government intervention in our lives, not less.
"A State of Disobedience" uses the 'war on terror' as the foundation for a radically expanded federal government, curtailing civil liberties and crushing all opposition. The basis is important, provocative, and even profoundly educational; Kurt Vonegutt or Ronald Heinlein could have made a masterpiece out of it, but Kratman's work is surprisingly unfulfilling.
The plot proceeds along the expected lines: the federal government reachs a point where resistance to its plans cannot be ignored and switches an greatly enlarged federal law enforcement into combat mode. The Surgeon General even controls a law enforcement agency. The expanding atrocities comitted by these groups pull support away in favor of the rebellious Texans, and the President finds the 'world turned upside down'.
The characters are stereotyped to the point where character development is impossible. Out of every character in the book, only one seems to have the conflicting mix of emotions, ideals and needs to be real.
The characters' stereotyping also extends to the plot. The atrocities are not new, and neither is the premise. Similar works can be found in the public domain by running a query on Google. Although they didn't receive professional editing treatment, the meat is carved from the same animal as this book.
If some true moral conflict were involved, then the book would be much more tolerable.
In other words, complete drek.
Added in edit to clarify and to reply to above:
I believe everyone has the right to own any weapon, including machineguns.
I believe the liberal police state is a threat to human existence.
I believe in conservative ideals.
I can't stand Clinton - either one of them.
I believe taxation is theft.
I believe Tom Kratman not only can't write worth a damn, but is an embarrassment to the conservative movement.
As another reviewer noted, this is a voice those of us on the real right wish would go away. He's a loon. He wants to fix what's wrong with the government's intrusiveness by giving it different and "better" intrusiveness.
As to the challenge to find "one bad sentence," here we go, assuming Amazon doesn't filter it:
"To Ms. Wilhelmina Rottemeyer, President-Elect of the United States of America, the sound was orgasm. Never in her life had a thrusting man entering her body given her such a glorious feeling."
Yes, you can't get higher literature than that.
"The People howled their outrage and their triumph until quelled again by their leader's gentle pats."
Aw, how sweet.
Mr. Kratman may be the best proof anywhere that lawyers have no business in government.Read more ›
1. Demonization of the enemy:
Pro-choicers are all baby-killing lunatics, environmentalists are all chicken-little types with no grip on reality, gun control advocates will not be satisfied until until every private firearm is destroyed, etc., etc.
2. Beatification of the heroes.
Every Texan(TM) is polite, unafraid, and a crack shot. Every military man is a professional, and is only following orders, up until he Does The Right Thing, and joins the Texans.
3. Appeal to prurient interest:
The sexual orientations of the villains is clearly included to allow the readers to giggle about it.
4. There is but one true god:
All the heroes are Christian. None of the villains are religious, although Judaism is made reference to as being associated with the Eeevil(TM) Libruls(TM). I don't think the author is trying to be anti-semitic, however, as the reference is subtle, and the author displays subtlety nowhere else in the book. The author clearly interprets "freedom of religion" to mean Christians can do whatever they want in the political arena and no other religions could possibly matter.
5. War worship:
While the author is listed as having served, there is no indication in his writing of having seen the elephant. Even in the final battle at "Not The Alamo," the valiant defenders battle on, right until the very end. They never seem to react to death or danger or stress. If you've read David Drake, you know how an author can successfully protray this without making the characters seem cowardly.
Overall, the biggest flaw in the book is the reduction of politics to Right=Good, Left=Bad.Read more ›
Most recent customer reviews
Another reviewer has said:
"Bah. If the left had their way this book which offends them so badly by portraying the truth would be burned and the author sent to a... Read more
An interesting near-future look at political correctness and the backlash from same. This is a first novel, and uses more stereotypes than I would like, but definitely gets it's... Read morePublished on Feb. 17 2004 by Justin Bischel
Very difficult to put down (I've been reading for the past 3 hours with less than 5 minutes of interruption, and that for food/bathroom). Read morePublished on Feb. 2 2004
When a work of fiction garners almost nothing but 1 star and 5 star ratings,and those is about equal numbers, one has to wonder what the truth of the matter is. Read morePublished on Jan. 29 2004 by julia p. smith
Bah.... I picked up this book as I have always liked reading about future accounts of america in times of trouble... Read morePublished on Jan. 18 2004 by Dekker Graden
This is an inspiring book about a Second American Revolution. An extremely liberal Democrat (think Hilary Clinton) has become President of the USA, and has started to implement a... Read morePublished on Jan. 15 2004
One of the other reviewers said that if they could have given this book zero or negative stars, they would have. I heartily concur. Read morePublished on Jan. 13 2004
...to know that it is bad.
After painfully slogging through the clangingly turgid prose of the first two chapters of this book, i skipped here and there ahead to confirm my... Read more