Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Neither Greek nor Jew, Jan 10 2010
Because of my misunderstanding of Paul's role in the development of Christianity, I had always seen him as a perverter of Christ's message, in his role in the creation of the Christian (Catholic) Church which I had always thought was not what Christ had intended. I read Jacques Maritain's work on Paul. I purchased this work with some trepidation, fearing that I might be bored by more on Paul, or become tired of French argumentation and vocabulary; however, I was greatly surprised by this book and have just spent hours reading it. As I doubt there is anything that can be called "absolutely true" in Christian historical studies, I would recommend this as an insightful interpretation of the times and events and thoughts of St Paul, and as a more accessible work than Maritain's. Interpretations of the epistles (the ones currently recognized as having been written by Paul), especially the conflict between Paul and Peter and the other Jerusalem apostles, the opposition between the Law and the revelation of the Resurrection, the question of focus on Gentile or Jew, the very important meaning of "neither Greek nor Jew", (etc) and explication of the alterations or editing of works to make Paul more conformist to the doctrines being formulated a century or two later and for inclusion in the New Testament (to oppose heresies that were coming into existence), and the 'sell-out' to the Greek mode of thought (in opposition to Paul's wishes, as revealed in the "neither Greek nor Jew" portions of his writings) make this a fascinating read. Yes, everything the 3-star rating by Tron Honto says is true. In some ways, this is a work of atheist theology, which seems to be current, with such exponents as Badiou's great buddy, Slavoj Zizek, and Andre Comte-Sponville in his "Little Book of Atheist Spirituality." But it is a worthwhile read: maybe someone who is a singularity, as was Paul of Tarsus, will come along and smash 'the matrix of global capitalism and pathetic liberal democracy' (it seems that neither Badiou nor Zizek are fans of either nor of the pudgy intellects of the bourgeois left). But, while we wait, take a look at how Christianity came about, and how it has been perverted from the message intended by Paul, and read Paul's message (which could still apply to a contemporary singularity) - as Badiou says, 'it was a revolution upon which we are still dependent.' Needless to say, I have changed my opinion of Paul, though I have not been converted. (Also of interest is mention and quick outline of Pier Paolo Pasolini's film script, set in the 1940s, of Paul's life. Interesting how Communists have been long fascinated with Christianity.) Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Philosophical Laicization of Paul, Oct 28 2003
Badiou's extended essay on Paul may be a bit amateurish and crude from a theological and/or historical perspective [his intents and aims, he admits, are solely subjective], but despite this, it achieves a noteworthy amount of novel philosophical insight using the texts of Paul as a launchpad. There are two sides to this book. On one hand, Badiou appears as a sort of atheist apologist for Paul, whom he seeks to clear of common insults against his person popular since Nietzsche and others (such as being a mysoginist, a despiser of earthly life, etc.) Badiou wants us to view Paul not in the popularized polemic distortion that pervades atheists in academia but rather as the prototypical 'poet-thinker of the event'. On the other hand, in so far as one can say this of Paul, Badiou wants to extract from his portrayal a revolutionary philosophy of 'the event' and its founding of universiality. Here, the argument becomes complexly interwined with the words of Paul and Christian discourse; however, it brings with it a certain uncanny lucidity as the revolutionary universiality of the Resurrection in Paul's discourse sets the scene to disolve and overcome the particularities of the Judaic and Greek status quo.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
35 of 35 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Enter Badiou, Feb 6 2005
By Lost Lacanian - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism (Paperback)
This fantastic little book is one of Badiou's best. The US was first introduced to Badiou with his book "Ethics"--and I believe it would benefit any reader to go to that book first before reading "Saint Paul." But for those who are aware of Badiou's overall project, this book will provide fascinating reading. Here, Badiou goes into why he thinks Universality is an important and indispencible concept for politics. He goes into how Global Capitalism has thrived off fractures and splinters in identity, and how constructing a universal community is necessary for any struggle against capitalism. He also goes into a detailed analysis of the subject through the figure of Saint Paul. If you are looking for an actual commentary on Saint Paul, then, this is not the book for you. If you already dislike, or do not understand what Badiou's is trying to accomplish, then, this book will do little for you. But, if you are truly intrigued by this philosopher, and if you are quite aware of his prose and dependence upon set theory and mathematical concepts, then, Saint Paul will be of great interest to you.
23 of 26 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Truth and Testimony, Nov 13 2004
By Neckar - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism (Paperback)
This book provides a very novel insight not only on Paul but on Christian theology as well. One of the most interesting reflections is the differentiation between the philosophical discourse of wisdom (Greece), the prophetic discourse of signs (Israel) and the testimony of the event (Christianity). There is no pagan conformism to the laws of the universe nor a cryptic awaiting for a promise, but an event that concerns us all in terms of placing ourselves in a place beyond the automatism of the Law, in a world of Life. The main figure is not of the prophet or the philosopher but of the apostol, the one who testifies of a universal truth where there is no difference between I and the Other. Badiou's interpretation of Saint Paul does not compromise itself with received scholastic theology where there is a continuity of God with Being (analogia entis) nor with a postmodern theology where the promise is something to be kept differing forever in order to "do justice" to the Other. Badiou provides a universalist theory that includes the difference but where there is no difference and boundaries for the sake of the ethical. No Jew nor Greek, no men nor women, to be all to all men.
42 of 53 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Philosophical Laicization of Paul, Oct 28 2003
By Tron Honto - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism (Paperback)
Badiou's extended essay on Paul may be a bit amateurish and crude from a theological and/or historical perspective [his intents and aims, he admits, are solely subjective], but despite this, it achieves a noteworthy amount of novel philosophical insight using the texts of Paul as a launchpad. There are two sides to this book. On one hand, Badiou appears as a sort of atheist apologist for Paul, whom he seeks to clear of common insults against his person popular since Nietzsche and others (such as being a mysoginist, a despiser of earthly life, etc.) Badiou wants us to view Paul not in the popularized polemic distortion that pervades atheists in academia but rather as the prototypical 'poet-thinker of the event'. On the other hand, in so far as one can say this of Paul, Badiou wants to extract from his portrayal a revolutionary philosophy of 'the event' and its founding of universiality. Here, the argument becomes complexly interwined with the words of Paul and Christian discourse; however, it brings with it a certain uncanny lucidity as the revolutionary universiality of the Resurrection in Paul's discourse sets the scene to disolve and overcome the particularities of the Judaic and Greek status quo.
|
|
|