Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

CDN$ 16.00 + CDN$ 3.49 shipping
In Stock. Sold by Deal Beat

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Vanderbilt CA Add to Cart
CDN$ 29.95
M and N Media Canada Add to Cart
CDN$ 51.20
Have one to sell? Sell yours here

Shadow of the Vampire

John Malkovich , Willem Dafoe , E. Elias Merhige    R (Restricted)   DVD
3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (139 customer reviews)
Price: CDN$ 16.00
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 5 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by Deal Beat.

Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this Movies & TV with Nosferatu [Import] CDN$ 7.05

Shadow of the Vampire + Nosferatu [Import]
Price For Both: CDN$ 23.05

These items are shipped from and sold by different sellers. Show details

  • This item: Shadow of the Vampire

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Deal Beat.
    CDN$ 3.49 shipping.

  • Nosferatu [Import]

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Product Details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
By falcon TOP 1000 REVIEWER
Format:DVD
this fictionalized and embellished account of the filming of the 1922 classic vampire tale Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens,directed by Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau was certainly eerie and atmospheric.Willem Dafoe is unrecognizable as Max Schrek/Count Orlock underneath all the prosthetics and makeup,and pretty much inhabits the character.John Malkovich portrays Murnau as possibly insane.the scenes of interaction between Murnau and Orlock crackle with intensity.i also liked the opening sequence.i thought it really set the mood,although i could see how some people might think differently.it is a bit long,and at first glance doesn't appear to be relevant to the rest of the film.anyway,i liked it.for me,Shadow of the Vampire is a 4/5
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars great acting, but incompletely developed ideas Jan 31 2004
Format:DVD
Hmmm. Interesting film. Like many pieces of art that thinks about art, it gets a bit idea-ridden. But the thoughts are interesting, and Dafoe's performance as Schreck / Count Orloch is something divinely weird. Here is a movie with a genius makeup artist, who manages to re-create the vampire of Nosferatu (no creepier vampire has ever been shown on screen, I think) with exactitude . . . and Dafoe gives him PERSONALITY! It's not just the pity-the-monster pathos, though that's beautifully touched on when, alone in a cave, he begins reading from Tennyson's 'Tithonus' . . . "The woods decay, the woods decay and fall / the vapors weep their burthen to the ground / Man comes and tills the field and lies beneath / and after many a summer dies the swam.../ Me only cruel immortality consumes. . . " but the absurdity of his situation. He has read Dracula, he says, and finds it sad, because the poor count has no servants, and has to be seen by his guest serving the table, making up a meal he cannot partake. He feeds like an old man pees, he says, all at once or in drips. He ghoulishly stuffs down a passing bat like a Circus geek. He snorts and sniffs like one so long alone has has forgotten to have normal manners. After rudely smacking his lips feeding greedily on the desired maiden (no maiden indeed!) he snores in piggy satiation. He is awful and repellant, and very, very funny at the same time. Malkovich's Murnau is a little less of a delight. The whole idea of his character--one so obsessed with creating immortal (or should we say undying?) art that he is willing to expose his cast and crew to the depradations of the real vampire thing, is a sort of mad scientist joke that has all the manifest and hard-to-believe stupidity it usually does in the old horror flicks. He keeps cranking away at the camera while Orloch snaps necks and sucks noisily on the heroine's throat. He has striven so hard for verisimilitude that he is willing to have a rogue creature on the set, but then he complains peevishly when the count dares to commit a murder in such a way as to spoil the composition in the frame. Still, what he says about art and film is telling, and memorable. The director is meant to show us another sort of monster, I guess--the kind who gets so in the grip of an idea about imitating reality that he wittingly or unwittingly shoots a snuff film. This is a level of irresponsibility it's a bit hard to accept. But then, of course, it's a level of irresponsibility in our minds because we rapidly come to believe that Orloch either believes he is the real thing or IS the real thing . . . and how real is THAT???? Meanwhile the cast and crew continue to accept his unpleasant presence as that of a method actor who takes his art very seriously. It's a clever hall of mirrors in which not all the characters have reflections. The incorporation of footage from Nosferatu is done extremely well and seamlessly. And yes, there is irony in recalling that one of the first things done in film, was to put on deathless celluloid the moving life & murderous acts of the undead.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Definitely my Favorite vampire movie! April 1 2004
By A Customer
Format:VHS Tape
First of all I must admit I don't much care for most vampire movies -- different reasons for different ones. But this one I just loved! Willem Dafoe was SO camp as the very creepy looking vamp, and you could tell he was enjoying the heck out of his role. That makes it really good, when the actor is really enjoying playing a Creep. Also, the whole storyline and cinematography, other actors, screenplay, everything was just Excellent. I don't give many movies (of any genre) 5 stars, but this one I do. Awesome!!
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?
Most recent customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars Satisfying, but not a good stand-in for the original
This film is candy for film lovers, especially for those like myself who can't get enough of the early silent cinema. Read more
Published on April 3 2010 by Nathan Andersen
5.0 out of 5 stars A film you can't miss.
Before we start, let's talk about the film's plot. This film takes place in 1929, were there filming the classic film, Notferatu(I think that's spelled wrong). Read more
Published on May 22 2004 by Lauren B. Floss
2.0 out of 5 stars Why?
Willem Dafoe was great in this film, but that's as far as this good review goes. Maybe, I just didn't "get" what they were trying to do with this film. Read more
Published on May 6 2004 by "piranhablues1"
5.0 out of 5 stars Great idea ruined by a talentless director
A brilliant idea, a brilliant cast...and then comes director E. Elias Hemorroid to lend it absolutely no sense of drama or tension. Read more
Published on Mar 9 2004
4.0 out of 5 stars It's all about Willem Dafoe.
What a great idea for a screenplay: What if the slightly mad German director of a legendary vampire film insisted on casting a real bloodsucker for the lead role? Read more
Published on Feb 18 2004 by Maine Writer
1.0 out of 5 stars This is a terrible mess....
This is a case of where the TRAILER is a way better than the movie itself. It is hard to imagine that someone could make a mess out of the story of the making of Nosferatu but E. Read more
Published on Jan 14 2004 by OverTheMoon
4.0 out of 5 stars An underrated gem
Shadow of the Vampire was released with little fanfare, and the film was too quirky to earn any real money at the box office. Read more
Published on Jan 9 2004 by Jesse Hilsenrad
4.0 out of 5 stars Not a bad vampire film
When I fist saw the original Nosferatu a few halloweens ago,I had no idea what I was getting myself into.The portray of this animalistic vampire was played beautifully. Read more
Published on Dec 19 2003
5.0 out of 5 stars Fun and original-minded work: heightens the original's magic
There is a fear to be had in this kind of work. Because it's not only delving into such a monumental piece of motion picture history but purporting to shed new 'light' on that... Read more
Published on Dec 5 2003 by Johnny S Geddes
3.0 out of 5 stars Almost good
I was prepared to enjoy this film, because the premise and range of actors is promising. Overall, I think it was a good idea that was not that well executed. Read more
Published on Sep 14 2003
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Feedback


Deal Beat Privacy Statement Deal Beat Shipping Information Deal Beat Returns & Exchanges