4.0 out of 5 stars
must have for true crime buffs, Nov 13 2002
This review is from: Shots in the Dark: Crime Photographs from Daguerrotype to Internet (Paperback)
The content of this book is often quite shocking and surely not for the squeamish. I am aware that many people will dislike it. But in order to understand crime and its effects on society one has to face reality. The ugly face of reality and not only crime as a figure.
The book starts with an excellent introduction by Harold EVANS "Looking Crime Squarely in Its Disturbing Eye", followed by an essay by author Gail BUCKLAND about the development of forensic photography and the creator of the mugshot, the frenchman Alphonse BERTILLON in particular. I found this chapter especially compelling.
The rest of the book consists of crime pictures with short captions by the author, many of them are unfortunately rather brief. With only one or two exceptions all featured photos are black and white. Many of those shot in the period from 1930-1950 have a certain film noir look due to sharp contrast. Many pictures are not easy to look at particularly those shot at homicide scenes. And you'll see a lot of homicide scenes. There is a picture taken by a surveillance camera during the April 1999 Columbine school shooting, a police officer looking in despair at the body of a girl shot at the 1984 Mc Donald's massacre in San Ysidro, the corpse of slain actress Sharon TATE, crime scene photographs of stabbed Nicole SIMPSON, lots and lots of unknown victims of murder...As mentioned before, this is sometimes not easy to look at.
Another chapter is about punishment. An horrifying account of lynch justice is given; according to the author it was common practice in the last decades of the 19th century to send photographs of lynchings to friends and relatives. I didn't know that. You see photographs of the last public execution in the US, which took place in 1936, convicts in prisons, an arrested man tied to a restrainment chair etc. A very compelling chapter but I have to add that BUCKLAND shows way too much compassion for convicts in her captions commenting the pictures. Undoubtedly a convict can not be denied his human rights, but we have to bear in mind that many of them committed unspeakable acts of violence and too much compassion for such people is highly inappropriate.
I especially liked the chapter about presidential assassinations. There are portraits of president LINCOLN's assassin's co-conspirators and photos of their execution on the gallows. The most infamous political murder of the last century, the assassination of president KENNEDY in Dallas, is depicted in a very detailed manner with many rare and often cruel photos ( e.g. the slain president on the autopsy table and the corpse of Lee Harvey OSWALD after a postmortem was conducted) accompanied by insightful captions, which convey more information in some sentences than many non-fiction books in hundreds of pages.
A selection of celebrity mugshots (including Frank SINATRA, Jane FONDA and Bill GATES) adds a little curiosity and fun to an otherwise sombre and shocking book. Especially FONDA and GATES look incredibly ludicrous in their mugshots.
While I generally found SHOTS IN THE DARK a great book I didn't like two chapters very much, because they are so "overpublished". These were about gangland world and infamous cases. I mean how often did you see photographs of the O.J.SIMPSON trial? How often did you see Al CAPONE's not so friendly features?
But these are only minor complaints. This book is a must have for every true crime fan. It could also be of interest for people who like death shockumentaries.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1.0 out of 5 stars
Gail Buckland makes money from others faces., Oct 21 2007
This review is from: Shots in the Dark: Crime Photographs from Daguerrotype to Internet (Paperback)
I'm very disappointed and angry at Ms. Buckland. She must not research every picture that she makes money off of. This book is filled with guilty, ville people. Yet some how an innocent man made the cover. She doesn't know him and shouldn't be able slander a great father's face like that. Because of this book my father is associated and grouped with killers like Jeffery Damer and Harvey Glatman just because a cop had a camera and the wrong guy! And because Gail Buckland was looking for a Kodak moment and not the truth. She sells blood and gore and doesn't care if she ripped a man's decency away as long the picture tells a bad story. The truth is pictures lie. Who is she to find a picture and paint a different truth over it. My father passed away years ago and he was a great man; but my children will have a bad impression of him imprinted in there minds because they are the ones who recognized grandpa and informed me of this book. I urge everyone to boycott this book of gruesome lies for every innocent man who can't fight back. Thank You.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting but not what I expected, Aug 26 2005
This review is from: Shots in the Dark: Crime Photographs from Daguerrotype to Internet (Paperback)
The photos are great and the text is interesting, but I wasn't expecting so much history. This is definitely a historical look at crime photos with an occasional contemporary pic.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No