- Hardcover: 264 pages
- Publisher: Mandrake of Oxford (Nov 1 1990)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1869928156
- ISBN-13: 978-1869928155
- Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)
- See Complete Table of Contents
| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars
Conclusions absolutely unfounded but still interesting,
By C. J. Thompson "Arctic John" (Pond Inlet, Nunavut Canada) - See all my reviews (TOP 100 REVIEWER) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: Sickert and the Ripper Crimes: The 1888 Ripper Murders and the Artist Walter Richard Sickert (Paperback)
I actually rather expected to get halfway through this book and then abandon it. After all, it is another retelling of the 'Royal cover-up' conspiracy theory advanced in Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution and Ripper & the Royals, albeit with a twist in that the painter, Walter Sickert, is fingered as the killer. This in fact, is also the conclusion in Patricia Cornwell's ridiculous book, Portrait Of A Killer, which was written after the first edition of this one, and from which, some say, she cribbed shamelessly and without acknowledgment. This is actually the reason I bought this book because I wanted to see what the earlier theory was about. I didn't expect to be convinced by any means and, as I say, I half expected to skim it without much interest. As it happened though, I quite enjoyed the book and read it from start to finish.The story behind the book is that a female artist and acquaintance of Walter Sickert, told the author's mother that she and Sickert both knew Mary Kelly, the last canonical victim, and that he had told her that she might be in danger because of her acquaintance with Kelly. From this and other facts, the friend concluded that Sickert was himself the killer. Years later, in 1948, the author's mother repeated the story to her daughter in a way that suggested she had no doubt as to its veracity. The thing I enjoyed about this book is the reading it rather gives the senses of hearing the book... as though one were ensconced in a comfy chair in front of a fire with a hot cup of cocoa, listening to a long rambling story by an aging relative which is not quite believable but cozily entertaining nevertheless. It was a pleasant, easy read. Inevitably, there is not a shred of actual evidence against Sickert, even if one accepts the second hand hearsay at face value. The so-called clues in Sickert's paintings are a stretch at the very best and the supposed motive and manner of execution is just not beleiveable. Still, although novice Ripperologists should read a few more mainstream works first, many collectors will wish to have this one. In this newest edition in particular,Overton discusses the Cornwell book and has some interesting things to say.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta) Amazon.com:
3.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review) 2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
Conclusions absolutely unfounded but still interesting,
By C. J. Thompson "Arctic John" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Sickert and the Ripper Crimes: The 1888 Ripper Murders and the Artist Walter Richard Sickert (Paperback)
I actually rather expected to get halfway through this book and then abandon it. After all, it is another retelling of the 'Royal cover-up' conspiracy theory advanced in Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution and Ripper & the Royals, albeit with a twist in that the painter, Walter Sickert, is fingered as the killer. This in fact, is also the conclusion in Patricia Cornwell's ridiculous book, Portrait Of A Killer, which was written after the first edition of this one, and from which, some say, she cribbed shamelessly and without acknowledgment. This is actually the reason I bought this book because I wanted to see what the earlier theory was about. I didn't expect to be convinced by any means and, as I say, I half expected to skim it without much interest. As it happened though, I quite enjoyed the book and read it from start to finish.The story behind the book is that a female artist and acquaintance of Walter Sickert, told the author's mother that she and Sickert both knew Mary Kelly, the last canonical victim, and that he had told her that she might be in danger because of her acquaintance with Kelly. From this and other facts, the friend concluded that Sickert was himself the killer. Years later, in 1948, the author's mother repeated the story to her daughter in a way that suggested she had no doubt as to its veracity. The thing I enjoyed about this book is the reading it rather gives the senses of hearing the book... as though one were ensconced in a comfy chair in front of a fire with a hot cup of cocoa, listening to a long rambling story by an aging relative which is not quite believable but cozily entertaining nevertheless. It was a pleasant, easy read. Inevitably, there is not a shred of actual evidence against Sickert, even if one accepts the second hand hearsay at face value. The so-called clues in Sickert's paintings are a stretch at the very best and the supposed motive and manner of execution is just not beleiveable. Still, although novice Ripperologists should read a few more mainstream works first, many collectors will wish to have this one. In this newest edition in particular,Overton discusses the Cornwell book and has some interesting things to say. |
|