CDN$ 26.61
  • List Price: CDN$ 26.78
  • You Save: CDN$ 0.17 (1%)
Usually ships within 12 days.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Add to Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

Significant Others: Interpersonal and Professional Commitments in Anthropology Hardcover – Mar 25 2004


Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 26.61
CDN$ 19.55 CDN$ 51.08

Join Amazon Student in Canada


NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 312 pages
  • Publisher: University of Wisconsin Press; 1 edition (March 25 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0299194701
  • ISBN-13: 978-0299194703
  • Product Dimensions: 24 x 16 x 2 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 553 g
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #2,167,363 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 1 review
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Anthropologists as Persons Aug. 14 2005
By Emanuel Marx - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This is the tenth volume in the justly celebrated series, 'History of Anthropology'. The series, started by G.W. Stocking, Jr., has been instrumental in setting up a new and thriving sub-discipline of anthropology. By critically examining the past, these writers are helping anthropology in its desperate struggle to survive and reinvent itself, for the future of this (or any other) discipline is not at all asured. Each of the seven articles in this volume deals with the relations between well-known anthropologists and 'significant others', such as a spouse, a son, students or colleagues. All the articles are solidly documented and well written. The articles that I found most moving, were Engelke's, dealing with the relations between Vic and Edie Turner and Schumaker's on Max Gluckman as director of the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute. But all the articles, without exception, are extremely interesting, each presenting a clearcut and refutable argument. They open a discussion that, hopefully, will be continued in years to come.


Feedback