Most helpful customer reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
A New Approach to Gothic, May 8 2000
This review is from: Skin Shows - PB (Paperback)
Indeed, the literary genre that we know as the gothic is inexhaustible in its interpretive capacity. From Freud's theory of the Uncanny and Mourning/Melancholia, to Feminist theories and reader response approaches (such as that of Norman Holland's), the gothic as a literary outsider has come a long way from its inception as a marginal form of literature to become one of the most studied and complex form of writing. Halberstam's book is one of the latest critical offerings of reading the Gothic, and it is indeed a timely arrival of an otherwise over-determined reading of this particular genre from the various theoretical approaches (interesting as they may be). Halberstam's approach, grounded in history and racism, renews the gothic's early preoccupation with otherness and the fear of it, but which emphasizes the societal fear of the alien/foreign other, and not so much the struggle between the public and private selves (the beloved of psychoanalytical theory). Her most interesting chapter is the reading of Stoker's `Dracula' as an anti-semitic propoganda text; indeed, I have appropriated some of her ideas in my view on postcolonial gothic, for I find that her theoretical stance has much to offer in this new and under-emphasized aspect of gothic literature. Halberstam's careful and brilliant intertwining of psychoanalysis, race-relations theory (history) and literary deconstruction is also critically executed in clear, precise language. I strongly recommend this book to anyone who wishes to have a fresh outlook on gothic literature.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
18 of 19 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
A New Approach to Gothic, May 8 2000
By Andrew Ng Hock Soon "just a reader" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Skin Shows - PB (Paperback)
Indeed, the literary genre that we know as the gothic is inexhaustible in its interpretive capacity. From Freud's theory of the Uncanny and Mourning/Melancholia, to Feminist theories and reader response approaches (such as that of Norman Holland's), the gothic as a literary outsider has come a long way from its inception as a marginal form of literature to become one of the most studied and complex form of writing. Halberstam's book is one of the latest critical offerings of reading the Gothic, and it is indeed a timely arrival of an otherwise over-determined reading of this particular genre from the various theoretical approaches (interesting as they may be). Halberstam's approach, grounded in history and racism, renews the gothic's early preoccupation with otherness and the fear of it, but which emphasizes the societal fear of the alien/foreign other, and not so much the struggle between the public and private selves (the beloved of psychoanalytical theory). Her most interesting chapter is the reading of Stoker's `Dracula' as an anti-semitic propoganda text; indeed, I have appropriated some of her ideas in my view on postcolonial gothic, for I find that her theoretical stance has much to offer in this new and under-emphasized aspect of gothic literature. Halberstam's careful and brilliant intertwining of psychoanalysis, race-relations theory (history) and literary deconstruction is also critically executed in clear, precise language. I strongly recommend this book to anyone who wishes to have a fresh outlook on gothic literature.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
Why Confuse the Issue with Academese?, Mar 10 2012
By Birt Acres "Cinemaniac" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Skin Shows - PB (Paperback)
Judith Halberstam's "Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters" (1995) makes two major points about Gothic horror: first about texts, that "[t]he production of fear in a literary text . . . emanates from a vertiginous excess of meaning" (2) and, second about film, that skin is the boundary which is challenged, brutalized, and sutured together in new configurations--which destroys any simple psychoanalytic reading one might make of the horror film. The book is good, but it relies far too heavily on "clever" postmodernisms. Here's an example: "Hannibal the Cannibal and Buffalo Bill are Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde as much as they are Dracula and Frankenstein. Jekyll, of course, produces Hyde from within his own psyche and he cannibalizes him when the pressure is on. Hyde is an incredibly close relative to Buffalo Bill--he too is 'hide-bound,' trapped in his skin, hidden by his hide and hiding from the law" (173). The problem is that if everything flows into everything else (if we're only clever enough to find a verbal connection) then what exactly am I supposed to learn from the book? Too often, in my humble opinion, postmodernism is simply an excuse for pedantic writing which is all surface and no depth--while denying that anyone has a right to challenge the surface and lack of depth.
|
|
|