28 of 34 people found the following review helpful
- Published on Amazon.com
Vine Customer Review of Free Product
I've always been fascinated by the D.B. Cooper story. I'm not sure why since I wasn't even born when he hijacked a Boeing 737 in the fall of 1971, then disappeared into the Washington wilderness. There's just something incredibly compelling about the whole story. It's so compelling, I couldn't put Skyjack: The Hunt for D.B. Cooper down. It arrived at 10:00am and, by 11:00pm the same day, I'd finished it.
Geoffrey Gray presents what can best be called the human side of the D.B. Cooper mystery. He's done incredible research into the lives of not only the likely suspects (he focuses on Kenneth Christiansen, Duane Weber, Richard McCoy, and Barbara (Bobby) Dayton), but also the pilots, flight attendants, FBI agents, and amateur sleuths involved with the case. The extent that the D.B. Cooper saga has impacted (and ruined) lives is simply incredible.
Gray also doesn't shy away from hard evidence and facts. He pursues and discusses countless leads, no matter how flimsy. He partnered with scientists, private investigators, experts of all kinds, FBI agents, and even the online community. He combined this information with new access to FBI files and other documents to provide the most up to date information about Cooper's motives, his possible identity, and where he may have ended up. He has a list of sources/references at the end of the book for those who may want to dig deeper.
In the end, however, the book is filled with a lot of "he might be or he might not be" with regard to Cooper's ultimate identity. Readers wanting a foregone conclusion should look elsewhere, but for those who want to decide for themselves based on the best information (count me in this category), Gray has done a fantastic job.
For a casual D.B. Cooper fan like myself, Skyjack was a treasure trove of new information. While there's no "smoking gun" fingering someone as a likely suspect, Gray does provide, based on scientific experiments, solid evidence that Cooper survived the jump, at least initially. He also relates some fascinating information linking Cooper to a clandestine government operation. Gray even hints that Duane Weber, with his connections to the CIA, James Earl Ray, and possibly even fellow suspect Richard McCoy, could be Dan Cooper.
Overall, I highly recommend Skyjack to anyone interested in D.B. Cooper, unsolved mysteries, or just history in general. Cooper engineered the perfect crime and stuck it to "the man," making him a folk hero to many. Although Gray can't tell us who he was with certainty (maybe no one can), he does a great job of capturing the mystery and the absurdity of D.B. Cooper, the man and, perhaps most importantly, the myth.
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful
- Published on Amazon.com
SKYJACK: THE HUNT FOR D.B. COOPER
by Geoffrey Gray
"I am on a plane and I am thinking of the Pulitzer prize. What is the prize? Is there a trophy? A plaque? Anything I'll be able to keep? A check to cash? And how will I apply? Or will they just know about my exposé unmasking the real D.B. Cooper as bashful Northwest purser Ken Christiansen? And how should the story start? (p. 87)
This is a perfectly representative paragraph from Geoffrey Gray's new book on D.B. Cooper - the man who hijacked an airplane flying from Portland, Oregon on November 24th, 1971; demanded and succeeded in taking $200,000 from an airline, and then parachuted into oblivion over rural South Washington state. The D.B. Cooper story is endlessly fascinating; the cult legend who was never caught has inspired annual celebrations, novels, and a litany of folk songs amongst other things (I own a D.B. Cooper t-shirt). The story is also a great case study for unsolved crime sleuths (D.B. Cooper the basis for one of the best segments featured on the classic Unsolved Mysteries series from the 1990s). Gray's book is the latest offering on the story and, unfortunately, ends up more concerned about Mr. Gray and his career than D.B. Cooper himself.
The following points strike me as to why this book fails:
1. The writing style is a shorthand, journalistic style. This style is used either for taking notes (that would be embellished later, before publishing) or for a film pitch, to create a sense of suspense in short timeframe. This style does not work in fiction or a historical narrative which is what I presumed this book (at least ostensibly) was to be about. Expect a frequent sentence length of no more than five or six words long.
2. It is littered with tiresome question marks throughout the text. Gray seems unsure of himself, the whole time.
3. The unbearable self indulgence of Gray. By page 119 he has already mentioned three times his wish for a Pulitzer with this book. This sort of nonsense is completely uninteresting. However it could be used as a not-so-subtle commentary on D.B. Cooper investigators, who are alleged to be out for their own fame.
4. The use of convenient but utterly weak points of interest that are used as circumstantial evidence, e.g. on p. 29 D.B. suspect, Kenny Christiansen's ruminations on a millionaire enjoying his millions and being paid to do a military test jump previous to the 1971 skyjacking.
5. The text is frequently jarring, jumping from 1970s to the 2000s to the 1980s or anywhere in between.
6. The book is short yet dwells, however briefly, on completely unrelated topics, such as Bobby Kennedy's tie or worst of all on p. 44 alluding to 9/11 terrorist attacks - "... With a hijacker at the controls, a domestic airplane becomes its own bomb. Thousands could die."
7. Dubious points of information thrown into the mix, e.g. on p. 21 how a passenger on the hijacked plane transports blood on refrigerated trucks, the blood samples coming from junkies who use the money from donating blood to feed their habit. This is quite dubitable and what's more there is no footnote or reference point to back it up. Because of this particular point's weakness and irrelevancy why is it still included?
8. For a book about an historical event and one that relies on investigation reliant on evidence, the referencing system is a joke. Also the inside covers featuring aviation maps of Portland and Seattle approaches are not revealing in anyway and unhelpful to the untrained aviation map reader. It smacks of "throwing it in there just for the sake of it."
Gray does hit some right notes along the way and reveals information I had not known before, such as D.B. suspect Christiansen's homosexuality, and flight stewardess Tina Mucklow becoming a nun, as well as painting an interesting picture of the rampant and outrageous sexism in the airline industry in the early 1970s (probably the best part of the book, and something which has nothing to do with the D.B. Cooper mystery.) But in trying to uncover the milieu of the 1970s he goes overboard with other points, especially on pages 31- 32 about returning Vietnam veterans. For a short book these asides are not merited.
Gray manages - whether inadvertently or on purpose - to reveal why several suspects made (false) admissions to being D.B. Cooper; they were damaged people with something to pretend, or had simply lost their marbles. The end of the book, the Curse section, was interesting only so far as the D.B. hunters involved had made their own story, D.B. takes somewhat of a back seat with these shenanigans. The book's end will certainly infuriate many readers, but for the sidetrack that Gray had taken throughout the book I think it's actually fitting. This book is not about sober, dispassionate investigation into the D.B. Cooper mystery, it is about Geoffrey Gray trying to make a grand scoop with the D.B. story. If you did not realise that, please know it before you buy the book. If I had known that before I (pre)ordered it I might have changed my mind.
There's yet to be a definitive text on D.B. Cooper, so let the story roll on. Skyjack: The Hunt for D.B. Cooper I suspect will fade to obscurity soon enough.
15 of 20 people found the following review helpful
- Published on Amazon.com
NO SPOILER ALERT NEEDED. THIS IS A REVIEW, NOT A SYNOPSIS.
Skyjack is the infamous story of the successful skyjacking of a commercial airlines flight in 1971. The hijacker demanded a ransom and parachutes. This teaser must suffice.
The upcoming 40th anniversary (Thanksgiving 2011) of the hijacking still holds America's fascination. We admire the guy with guts. And D. Cooper definitely had them. The author quotes a local Pacific Northwest newspaper, "...America canonizes its new patron saint of system f---ing." Everyone loves a hero--even one who's a bad boy.
The author, Geoffrey Gray, spent two years researching: reading, interviewing, and following leads. However, he failed to keep an unbiased point of view. He was caught up in the mystique. At one point, Gray states, "I can't remember what I am looking for." Gray gets lost within his own story. Distracting side stories of various characters detract from the plot itself.
Although this is Gray's first novel, he is a professional writer. He is a contributing editor for New York magazine. When dealing with character descriptions, he excels. We `see' as well as if we were looking at photos. He gives detailed accounts of the terrain; we are there with him. He writes dialogue fairly well, too. His tenacity to get the story and descriptive writing are his strengths.
Too bad he lacks others. Gray's Skyjack is a disjointed attempt to put together the puzzle in story form. He writes seemingly without an outline. Or, maybe he has ADHD. This jerkiness in storytelling is frankly, annoying. Instead of keeping the plot moving, we wander off the path with Gray as he presents multiple pages of anecdotes that do not enhance the story. As he attempts to get back on track, one almost hears him say, "Now, where was I?"
Gray's greatest crime, however, is Skyjack's abrupt ending. It's as sudden as a lightning bolt hitting without warning. It confounds me how his editor and publisher did not object.
Since this is non-fiction, a comprehensive bibliography would have been appreciated. As helter skelter as Gray writes this story, so too, is his bibliography. No attempt is made to categorize chronologically, alphabetically, or in any form that makes sense.
Don't bother with this one. It's not worth your time.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
G. A. Jacobs
- Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD
I thought this would be a straightforward account of the case, with new information. Scratch the straightforward part. One of the first rules of traditional journalism is, "Keep yourself out of the story." The "there I was" tales of how the reporter got the story are seldom that interesting compared to the story. This one's a case in point. About the time the narrative gets interesting, there's a long meandering detour off into 70s angst, fashions of the day, and so on. After a while I wondered as well if this was padding for a book-length story. "New Journalism" is hard to bring off, as if the reporter is somehow as interesting as the story. If you're Tom Wolfe or Hunter S. Thompson, you've got a case. This author, being kind, not so much. Still undecided on the new information and its value.
I had the audiobook, which the author reads himself. Usually that's a mistake, too. Scott Brick or some really good reader can help move a story. Do-it-yourself narration is like do-it-yourself surgery. Only a few can bring it off really well. Everyone else sounds like who they are, someone reading ... and reading ... and reading, minus the tone and inflection of the pros.
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
- Published on Amazon.com
I've always been interested in DB Cooper "the one that got away". So I really, really wanted to like this book. The first half isn't bad, alot of info about what exactly happened and how. The second half dissolves into a morass of kooks and nuts all claiming to now KNOW that their relative (all conveniently deceased) WAS DB Cooper. The author goes off into various "investigative" jaunts with some of these kooks and nuts and finds out - exactly nothing new about the case! There's quite a few suspects mentioned and at the end you are left thinking that a couple, or NONE of them could have been DB Cooper.
Sorry to say I don't think this book is worth the investment of your time or money.