I read this book with great expectations and was incredibly disappointed, to the point of anger.
Stalin was undoubtedly a monster, but this book treats its subject matter, especially during the crucial revolution and war periods, as if it were a cartoon. This alone is forgivable. What is not forgivable are gross distortions of facts and in some cases out and out lies regarding history.
For example, Radzinsky claims the following:
1. Stalin had Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad blessed by a parade of holy icons after the German invasion (as a result of prompting by the orthodox church). Radzinsky claims that this is the ONLY book that exposes this. Why? Well, this is the only book because this didn't happen.
2. Radzinsky claims that the Americans gave into Stalinist blackmail for a part in post-war Japan policy after Stalin threatened to expose the Americans' theft of Japan's national gold. This is a simple lie.
3. America only occupied Japan as 'they already lost China.' China fell to communism in 1949, four years later, and Mao and the Soviets always had a strained relationship.
4. Zhukov received the unconditional German surrender. False, Eisenhower did and the Soviet Marshall who signed the document was executed the next week in Moscow for doing it without Stalin's approval.
5. Stalin was planning on fighting the West just prior to his death, as he had the H-bomb first. A big lie - the Americans tested the first fusion bomb in 1952 and had a working weapon soon thereafter. The Soviets didn't have a test until after Stalin's death.
6. The only minority in the Soviet Union to help the Germans was the Chechyans - only if you ignore the Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Cossacks, etc. Radzinsky ultimately contradicts himself.
The book seems to have a few points:
1. Stalin was a monster.
2. Stalin still saved the world from the Nazis because he relied on Orthodox Russian nationalism.
3. The Russians are the strongest people in the world.
4. Russia will never be able to get true help or friendship from the West.
5. Russia must rely on its orthodox nationalism to win.
I should tell you I lived in Russia for some time, and I have a good knowledge of Russian history. Further, books of this kind simply do not get published without some political sponsorship. This book was published in 1996 during the presidential campaign in Russia and should be seen in this light - it is more a statement about current Russian political thought than real history.
Bashing the achievements of the West is still good politics and business in Russia. Another book published in the last few years gave 'scientific evidence' how NASA faked the moonlandings. As a result, most Russians younger than 40 do not believe that man walked on the moon. Indeed, this has resulted in some comedy between my friends and myself.
Please, if you insist on reading this book do not read it in a vacuum. I could write a list pages long on factual mistakes in the book, but see for yourself. The last 100 pages, especially the chapters on WWII, are exceptionally bad. I do not believe these errors were accidents - as I stated, this book is more a comment about current Russian politics than Stalin, and anyway, there are too many mistakes to be random. Its a crime, actually: both the subject and the country deserve better.