34 of 38 people found the following review helpful
- Published on Amazon.com
I've been anticipating this book for a few months now. I am in touch with a few authors who told me about the upcoming publishing of it and the fact that both helped Jones prepare it made me aware that this would be something worth looking into. I was not disappointed. It still amazes me that almost two decades after the Soviet Union has disappeared myths, half truths, and events taken out of context still exist regarding the Battle of Stalingrad, one of the most famous and widely written about events of the Second World War.
While most would look to Beevor's "Stalingrad: The Fateful Siege" as a guide to the battle, I would tell them to not waste their time. Jones, constantly, proves how Beevor has misinterpreted the history of the battle in one way or another or rather propagated already established myths. Beevor likes to claim he works in the archives, perhaps he does, in fact I'm sure he does, but how does Jones find so much more than Beevor? How is Jones able to correct his mistakes? Does Beevor have an underlying agenda? Or is he just a sloppy pseudo-historian? I cannot tell give you an answer to these questions, but I can tell you that Craig's "Enemy At the Gates" written decades before Beevor's work includes everything that Beevor's work does and then some, a better book and a better starting point for those interested in the battle of Stalingrad. But, if you do read Craig's work, read this book right after as it is a must for those interested in the Stalingrad battle.
I'm sure some of you are wondering what myths will be ripped apart within the pages of this new addition to the literature on Stalingrad. The first which stuck in my mind was the fact that Pavlov's House was not in fact known as such nor did Pavlov play as major a role as has been ascribed to him. Rather there were officers who were in charge, Pavlov was an NCO, and the garrison, which regularly is listed as having 24 men, numbered at times over 100. For propaganda purposes 24 seemed to make a point that these men while grossly outnumbered still stood their ground and defended this structure for 58 days against endless German counterattacks! Interestingly enough Beevor then mistakes what happened to Pavlov after the battle, claiming he became a monk, in fact Pavlov died a Communist and Beevor confused him with another Pavlov who also participated in the Stalingrad battle, sloppy research? Perhaps.
Another claim made by Beevor was that 13,500 soldiers were executed during the Stalingrad battle. Sadly, he gives no real source for this. In fact the Stalingrad front was made up of more than one army, the 62nd being the main army holed up in Stalingrad. In September the NKVD blocking detachments detained more than 1,218 men who were retreating from the field of battle, 21 were executed, 10 arrested, and the rest went back military units in the front. I can only wonder where that number of 13,500 came from. When the 62nd Army was struggling for its life, a division worth of men would not simply be killed off.
It was interesting to discover that Zaitsev, the famed Stalingrad sniper, was not the initiator of the sniper movement so many speak of today (Beevor among them). Rather it was he himself who was taught by another sniper who was the real initiator of the movement. This sniper and his story have been changed to accommodate the version that was created about Zaitsev, all of this is recounted in this book. Along with many other propaganda driven stories which elevated from the ruins of this city and have persisted in publications regarding Stalingrad to this day.
What this book does that no other comes close to is to describe the psychological relationship that the commanding officers, and not Lieutenants and Captains (although them as well), had with their men. Colonels and generals listened to the lowest private regarding his ideas about how to best fight the Germans and they incorporated those ideas with their own. At times it was almost a democratic process! Officers also held the line with their men and it was their courage and bravery that proved an inspiration for those they were leading time and time again. It started with Chuikov and Rodimtsev, the commanders of the 62nd Army and the 13th Guards Rifle Division, respectively. They were formidable adversaries for Paulus and the German 6th Army. It would continue with a multitude of other divisional commanders that would successively cross the Volga and be thrown into fierce bloody battles that held off the Germans for that small amount of time which was needed to keep them pinned down and let Zhukov and Vasilevsky accumulate forces on the flanks of the German 6th Army who in turn would eventually encircle it. These commanders included: Gorishny, Batyuk, Guriev, Smekhotvorov, Zholudev, Gurtiev, Lyudnikov, and Sokolov. These men kept their headquarters less than a kilometer from the enemy positions and took part in fighting with their men from time to time. No one was safe, and some of these commanders would be wounded in battle or buried alive as mortars and artillery zeroed in to their positions. This goes in the face of all those authors who think that the Red Army was a mass of heroic illiterates who could only throw themselves at the enemy without any initiative due to Stalin's purges of the Red Army and the atmosphere that prevailed in that time. Stalingrad surpassed that and showed the Red Army for what it was capable of being, both its commanders and privates.
All in all a gripping account, one that needed to be told, and mainly through accounts of the veterans themselves. Their struggle, their passion, courage, perseverance, and endurance. This combined with an excellent leadership ability on the part of their commanders and their opponents ineptness for street fighting, hand to hand combat, and night battles (not to speak of the mistakes made by Hitler and Paulus throughout the battle), gave rise to a catastrophe the likes of which Germany had never experienced before. A must read, a big thanks to the author for his hard work and dedication to this project!
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful
Brendan J. Mctear
- Published on Amazon.com
This book is as David Glantz says in the foreward, "a milestone" in the study of the Soviet side of the Battle. It turns a lot of the already accepted history on it's head. I loved reading it.
If you have read the other great works on this Battle and have a basic understanding of the battle's timeline, than this is a must read. It brings detail and life to people like Krylov, Rodimstev and especially Vasily Chuikov. In fact the book doubles as a reading aid to the now out of print memoire of Vasily Chuikov.
It also discounts and re-arranges every old Soviet Propaganda account of the Battle, including Chuikovs. The new sources are Soviet veterans including at least three which I can remember seeing in the BBC documentary War of the Century. I was stunned and a little hurt even to find out some of the most famous episodes and legends of this Battle were lies. I won't spoil the surprises for you. But what makes this book so amazing is that the new "truths" that Michael Jones has pieced together are even more compelling and authentic stories than the originals.
I was very happy to finally read a history of the Russian side of this story that was not ashamed of saying that the Red Army at Stalingrad was a heroic group of soldiers who fought to the death because in their minds it was the right thing to do. Their general's example of courage and determination taught them that they were fighting a must win cause. Often other authors on the subject play up Stalin's terror against his own people as a chief motivator for their will to fight. While it was most certainly true that Stalin ruled with an iron fist, it is also true that the atrocities carried out by the Nazis were certainly adequate motivation to fight an ultimate battle of survival against a 'hated invader.'
I would not recommend this book as your first introduction to the Battle of Stalingrad. It only covers the Soviet side of the battle and only within the city itself. Also I believe the author assumed the reader would have some background on this battle so he doesn't repeat a lot of the basic details of the battle, except for when he's about to offer some new evidence to discount it!
I recommend reading Anthony Beevor, John Erickson, Vasily Chuikov (out of print but available used on line), Joel S. Hayward, Stephan Walsh and even the classic William S. Craig versions of the story first before approaching this book.
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful
Philip W. Logan
- Published on Amazon.com
Michael K. Jones has written an extraordinary account of Stalingrad told by the Soviet veterans of the battle. As one reviewer has pointed out Jones' book challenges some of the myths of Stalingrad particularly from the Russian side. However, the crux of the book is material from the Soviet 62nd Army and accounts by Russian veterans of the battle present a harrowing account of life and death in the Stalingrad.
A book like this is long overdue. In the past many books even the excellent one by Beevor gives a panoramic view of the struggle at Stalingrad. Others have focused on the German accounts and documents readily accessible in the west. However, an in-depth study of the common Soviet soldier fighting in Stalingrad has been missing until now. Michael K. Jones has filled a huge void in Stalingrad literature.
If you are an enthusiast of the "German" side of the battle there is few if any German accounts in the book. However, the author has used German material to cross-reference the "Russian" accounts and documents of the struggle. For those stuck on the German side you will come to appreciate the German struggle at Stalingrad by becoming ferocious resistance of their Soviet opponent too often dismissed as a Communist automaton. In this book the Red soldier is not only motivated by fear of commissars and the Gulag but more importantly fiercely motivated by love of country to fight an invader to the death even against hopeless odd.
Michael K. Jones "Stalingrad" is a must for any serious student of the battle!!!
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
- Published on Amazon.com
At the outset, I feel obligated to acknowledge that I am unqualified to determine to what extent Michael J. Jones's and Antony Beevor's accounts of the Battle of Stalingrad are...and are not...accurate, nor have I read any of Beevor's books. The remarks that follow focus entirely on Jones's book and explain why I hold it in such high regard. Briefly, here are some facts that help to establish the context for the account that Jones provides. After Germany and the Axis powers invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 and advanced deep into Soviet territory, they suffered a series of defeats and failed in their drive to conquer Moscow. The United States had by then declared war on Germany and Hitler wanted to end the fighting on the Eastern Front or at least minimize it before the U.S. became deeply involved in the war in Europe.
Hitler was determined to invade and occupy Stalingrad because it was a major industrial city on the banks of the Volga River (a vital transport route between the Caspian Sea and northern Russia) and its capture would secure the left flank of the German armies as they advanced into the Caucasus with large oil deposits, desperately needed by the German army. Also, the city bore the name of Hitler's nemesis, Joseph Stalin, and capturing it would be an ideological and propaganda coup. Stalin also had an ideological and propaganda interest in defending the city but there were severe constraints in terms of time and resources. The Red Army, at this stage of the war, was less capable of highly mobile operations than was the German Army. Stalin's strategy was to have his troops engage in combat inside the city, an area that could be dominated by short-range small firearms and artillery rather than armored and mechanized tactics. The Battle of Stalingrad began in August of 1942 and continued until February of 1943. Estimates vary but most military historians agree that the combined casualties were at least 1.5 million and probably more. Jones examines the 65-day period during which the German forces began their siege of Stalingrad and took the battle into the city until the Russians launched a counter-offensive that eventually trapped and destroyed the German Sixth Army and other forces around the city.
There are several reasons why I think so highly of his book. Here are two. First, I was fascinated by the leadership style of Lieutenant-General Vasily Chuikov, Commander of the 62nd Russian Army. As Chuikov later wrote, "The most important thing I learnt on the banks of the Volga was to be impatient of blueprints. We constantly looked for new methods of organizing and conducting battle, starting from the precise conditions in which we were fighting." According to Jones, "Making a stand in such terrible conditions required absolute ruthlessness. Chuikov demanded the utmost of his men, insisting that they hold their lines come what may. It was a pitiless edge of steel behind Stalingrad's defenders."
Jones also quotes Anatoly Mereshko, a 20-year-old lieutenant, who served on the HQ staff of the 62nd Army, working directly under Chuikov. According to Mereshko, "Yuri Bondarev, in his film Hot Snow, did not hide the fact that one of his heroes, General Bessenov, was almost an exact prototype of Chuikov. The words he used when necessary to stop the German advance are virtually the same: `I allow no right of withdrawal. Not a step back! The present lines must be held to the last man. For everyone, without exception, there can b only one justification for leaving their position - death.'" Whenever necessary, Chuikov, could be - and was - merciless. But eventually under his leadership, the Russian forces prevailed.
Having already seen the film Enemy at the Gates, I was especially interested in what Jones shares in Chapter Eight concerning "The Birth of `Sniperism.'" In the film, the Russian sniper (Vassili Zaitsev portrayed by Jude Law) becomes involved in what amounts to an on-going duel with his German counterpart (Major König portrayed by Ed Harris). Both in the film and in reality, the snipers are caught up in the Battle of Stalingrad but there are significant differences that Jones cites, notably Beevor's claim that Zaitsev originated "sniperism." Jones's research suggests that this "is a wonderful myth - but nevertheless propaganda rather than truth. Zaitsev was a skilful teacher [who served with distinction in the 1047th Regiment of Colonel Nikolai Batyuk's 284th Rifle Division, killing more than 200 German soldiers] but he did not initiate the sniper movement." Proper credit should be given to Alexander Kalentiev who served in the same regiment. Be that as it may, Jones provides a wealth of information about the "tough, self-reliant hunters" whose singular temperament and talents as snipers are juxtaposed with the massive forces of two great armies engaged in perhaps the bloodiest combat throughout the entire war.
When concluding his account, Jones quotes Mereshko's observation that "Stalingrad was a smithy for commanders and many of those who distinguished themselves in battle went on to lead armies in their own right." Today, many of those commanders are buried on the Mamaev Kurgan, the hill that dominated the battle for the city. Vasily Chuikov is buried there. "Somehow in the burning hell that was Stalingrad, Chuikov created an army able to withstand everything the Germans threw at it. Their heroic story has struggled hard to come to life, caught between the propagandist clichés of the communist state - insinuating everyone at Stalingrad was heroic, and that the city would never have fallen to the enemy - and Western cynicism, which believes that Red Army heroism was only created at the barrel of a gun. Neither suffices. This terrible fight took Chuikov and his troops to the very limits of human endurance, and their testimony, now finally recovered, possesses a universal significance and power." In November of 1942, on and around Mamaev Kurgan, approximately 300,000 soldiers of the Wehrmacht, Axis allies, and Hilfswilligers were encircled and destroyed in a massive Soviet counter attack.
Even after reading this book, I find it incomprehensible that any of the Russian forces who defended Stalingrad and any of their opponents survived 65 days of being in the "burning hell" until finally, Friedrich Wilhelm Ernst Paulus surrendered on January 31, 1943, a day after he was promoted to the rank of Generalfeldmarschall by Adolf Hitler. I am grateful to Michael K. Jones for helping me to understand and appreciate "the universal significance and power" of what so many suffered and so few survived.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
- Published on Amazon.com
Very good book. Has many quotations by soldiers who were there rather than just a military analysis. This book details the constant hell the people in Stalingrad suffered as this war within a war was fought. It is hard to imagine the magnitude and conditions of this battle. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers fighting in a small area, bitter cold, over 1.5 million total casualties. This book gives a good history of the battle and makes me think about how valuable peace is.