Buy Used
CDN$ 0.01
+ CDN$ 6.49 shipping
Used: Acceptable | Details
Sold by WaddleShop
Condition: Used: Acceptable
Comment: Trusted US Seller. We ship the same or next business day and provide a tracking number with tracking info. A book with obvious wear. May have some damage to the cover and pages but integrity still intact accessories like cds, toys etc may not be included. Photo is a stock catalog image cover may be different.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Structuralism and Semiotics Paperback – Sep 12 1977


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 104.24 CDN$ 0.01

Save an Additional 10% on Textbooks When you Join Amazon Student

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.




Product Details

  • Paperback: 192 pages
  • Publisher: University of California Press (Sept. 12 1977)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0520034228
  • ISBN-13: 978-0520034228
  • Product Dimensions: 20 x 13.8 x 1.2 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 227 g
  • Average Customer Review: Be the first to review this item
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #421,767 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: HASH(0x9b0e6180) out of 5 stars 2 reviews
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9adbc1a4) out of 5 stars Structuralism Lite : But not easy. March 6 2001
By T. J. Stewart - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This is an excellent introduction into Structuralism and Semiotics. It is more detailed than a Structuralism comic book, but still presents the information in a clear and concise manner. The bibliography and recommended reading list alone are worth the price of the book.
The material is arranged chronologically, beginning with Saussure and Levi-Strauss, and concluding with the "New" new criticism.
After reading Hawkes, I had a much clearer understanding about the Structuralism/Linguistics connection. Also the section on Barthes was quite enlightening.
HASH(0x9add51a4) out of 5 stars An Intermediate Level Introduction June 17 2012
By Martin Asiner - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
When Terence Hawkes published STRUCTURALISM AND SEMIOTICS, the clock was already beginning to run out on structuralism. Just ten years earlier, Jacques Derrida declared that the neat and orderly world of the structuralists was based on no more than a shared illusion that the structures that lay under our collective feet were unconnected to anything substantive. Still, for those who wish to know the basics of a theory that Derrida and his successors were to trash it is required that they have at least a passing acquaintance with the contributions of Ferdinand de Saussure, Claude Levi-Strauss, the Russian Formalists, Roman Jakobson, Tzvetan Todorov, and Roland Barthes. The prose style of Hawkes is free from the cloying mannerisms of his current and future peers. He presents his version of their often competing and overlapping theories in such a way so as to enhance understanding. I would have appreciated, however, had Hawkes included a few more examples of how one might have transferred the abstractnesses of theory to the reality of literary criticism. The few exegetic paragraphs on the verse of cummings or William Carlos Williams hardly does justice to interpreting texts through the lens of structuralism. Interestingly enough, Hawkes devotes a few paragraphs to Derrida, whose own contributions he deems "interesting." The hatchet job that Derrida had already taken on structuralism does not negate the masterful analysis that Hawkes has done in this book. Finally, if for no other reason than to refute the various flubs and flaws that permeate the Derridean canon, one really ought to have a solid foundation in structuralism and semiotics. And this is what Hawkes has accomplished.


Feedback