4.0 out of 5 stars
One of my favorite books, May 22 2006
Granted, this is not going to be everyone's cup-o-tea. The language is strong and the author is STILL ahead of his time, if you ask me, but TROPIC OF CANCER, and his TROPIC OF CAPRICORN are two must-read books. Yes, I did get a little tired of the "C" word bantered about every word or so, but after a while you get used to it. Would also recommend Jackson T. McCrae's KATZENJAMMER which is a little less strongly worded, but a great romp nevertheless.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
Henry Miller wrote a lot of books, Feb 13 2006
By A Customer
Henry Miller wrote a lot of books ... but they are all essentially the same, about Henry.
Like all Miller's novels, the book contains some brilliant passages, but you'll have to slog through a lot ... a lot ... of self-absorbed ramblings before you get to them. But it's worth it just for the section of Van Norden's wanting to write something completely original, and Henry's missing of his wife. These sections are profound and true and wonderful and beautifully rendered. There's other good stuff, too, here and there.
Now, the dangerous part. Henry Miller made it fashionable to think you can be a bum/borderline sociopath, make fun of friends off of whom you live for your daily bread, avoid responsibilities and duties, and then publish self-indulgent ridicule about your dissolute lifestyle and derision of others and call it art. Fortunately, Henry was honest and talented enough at times to pull it off. And at times his writing raises to the levels of greatness. But he kicked off a school of writing that has been the destruction of more than one good writer.
Another novel written at the same time, and covering much of the same material (indulgent, pleasure-seeking expatriate meeting up with all levels of a society in crisis), is Giorgio Kostantinos's ' The Quest '. (It's like, hey, Henry, did you even notice that at the time you were muttering about blowing up the world, the country next door was electing a madman who would try to do just that.) The difference is Giorgio is a masterful writer and artist, and manages to artfully play off his self-absorption so that the reader isn't immersed in it, like in Henry Miller. Giorgio also has class and just abit better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Tropic of Cancer, May 16 2004
Since closing this book i have had a burning desire to travel to Paris...but not the modern day Paris; the 1930's Paris. Miller describes vividly the vibrant and jubilant Parisian atmosphere with it's incredible melange of aspiring artists, authors, whores, philosophers and down-and-out nobodies. Tropic of Cancer is also a fascinating intro-respective piece of literature as Miller reveals his own feelings towards the city and the many extraverted characters with whom he associates. Though miserable at times, largely due to his eternal struggle for food, Miller seems to adore this depraved, humble existance and does not allow his distressing financial situation to affect his rapturous spirits.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No