CDN$ 11.35 + CDN$ 3.49 shipping
In Stock. Sold by Classical Music Superstore

Compare Offers on Amazon
Add to Cart
CDN$ 11.22
+ CDN$ 3.49 shipping
Sold by: importcds__
Add to Cart
CDN$ 11.23
+ CDN$ 3.49 shipping
Sold by: Rarewaves-US
Add to Cart
CDN$ 11.69
+ CDN$ 3.49 shipping
Sold by: marvelio-ca
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Colour:
  • Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 6 Pathetique
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
      

Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 6 Pathetique Hybrid SACD


Price: CDN$ 11.35
Only 1 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by Classical Music Superstore.
17 new from CDN$ 11.21 3 used from CDN$ 11.20


Product Details

  • Audio CD (Sept. 14 2004)
  • Number of Discs: 1
  • Format: Hybrid SACD
  • Label: Sony Music Canada
  • ASIN: B0002TKFSG
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #60,142 in Music (See Top 100 in Music)

1. Adagio; Allegro Non Troppo
2. Allegro Con Grazia
3. Allegro Molto Vivace
4. Adagio Lamentoso

Product Description


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

0 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Cseke on Oct. 11 2011
Format: Audio CD
Great sound, great buy, shipping was very fast and came in perfect condition, well worth it and highly recommended. Thank you!
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 8 reviews
23 of 23 people found the following review helpful
Monteux's Magnificent Pathetique is Back! Feb. 25 2005
By Michael Brad Richman - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD
Finally Pierre Monteux and the Boston Symphony Orchestra's magnificent 1955 golden age stereo performance of Tchaikovsky's Symphony No. 6 receives its rightful reissue. For too long RCA/BMG has placed the spotlight on the Reiner, Ormandy and Munch accounts of this work, making them the "Pathetique" representatives of choice for earlier "Living Stereo," "Basic 100" and other budget-line series respectively. In all fairness, all three are quite good, and this Monteux 6th has been available on CD previously, with the composer's 4th and 5th Symphonies on a two-disc set in the now out-of-print "Monteux Edition" volumes. But here, the first recording Monteux made in Boston gets the star treatment it deserves for its 50th Anniversary. I've only picked up a few of these new "Living Stereo" SACD Hybrids, but even on my decent stereo system (HK amp, Denon CD, Bose & Klipsch Spks) I can really tell a difference in sound separation and clarity. And last but certainly not least, thank you BMG for making these Hybrids so affordable!
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Deeply moving, intense reading in superb sound Feb. 26 2014
By spaceneedleboy - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD
Pierre Monteux' s1955 reading of Tchaikovsky's Sixth Symphony is deeply personal, intense, and eloquent. In this reading, the Boston Symphony responds to Monteux's sense of the music's architecture with great polish and suaveness. The rendition of the third movement march is among the very, very best renditions I've ever heard - it may well have you leaping out of your chair.

I realize that many folks have criticized this recording, because at points Monteux adopts very slow tempos, although not to the degree of Leonard Bernstein's highly-applauded 1987 New York Philharmonic reading.

In the late 1970s, I cherished this reading from a relatively smooth-sounding 1975-vintage RCA Gold Seal vinyl LP release. I understand that there are numerous other compelling recorded versions of this piece. Among my personal favorite recordings of Tchaikovsky's Opus 74 - and I might be more open to diverse interpretations of this Tchaikovsky work than other music connoisseurs:

Wilhelm Furtwangler's 1938 Berlin Philharmonic performance - for me perhaps the gold standard for devastating intensity;

Eugene Ormandy's 1960 reading (for CBS) and 1968 reading (for RCA) - somewhat different from each other, but I find his sense of the music's architecture very convincing and noble - the CBS reading slightly edges out the RCA but in my view both are compelling;

Mravinsky's 1956 mono reading and 1961 stereo reading with the Leningrad Philharmonic - in my view, the 1956 mono slightly edges out the 1961 stereo, this is a blisteringly intense performance.

I'd give honorable mention to Karajan 1976 and Bernstein 1987 as highly worthwhile listening.

All of us will have opinions on how this composition should be performed and interpreted, but IMHO the Monteux/Boston reading is exceptionally worthwhile on its own merits. As an overall performance, I would place it just slightly behind my first three recommended readings.

As for the audio quality, I have only listened to the Red Book CD layer using a conventional two-channel CD player. I was blown away with the quality of Soundmirror's DSD transfer from the 1955 original master tapes. The dynamic range is very, very close to the best, something which is apparent when one hears the Boston Symphony's brass section deliver a true mezzo-forte blast in the third movement. There is plenty of hall ambience from Boston's Symphony Hall.

Up until I sold them off about four years ago, I had a few of the early RCA stereo recordings on their "Stereo Orthophonic" 2-track reel-to-reel releases (though I did not own this specific title on 2-track reel-to-reel). Even played on a conventional CD player, this hybrid SACD comes astonishingly close to capturing the richness and visceral dynamic impact of those ancient open-reel tapes.

My only real gripe about this hybrid SACD release is that there are no additional Monteux/Boston Symphony selections to fully fill out this disc.

In summary, this is a highly worthwhile release both in terms of a compelling (if slightly individual) performance and excellent 1955 early-stereophonic sound quality.
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful
A great remastered recording by a great conductor June 8 2010
By Raul Vasquez - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD Verified Purchase
I don't know what the other reviewers are listening to, but the SACD of Monteux's recording of the Symphony No. 6 sounds superb considering it's over fifty years old. Monteux's interpretation is fine, although some may find it lacking in passion and melancholy. If listeners wish for a fierier Pathetique, I would suggest they listen to Sir George Solti with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra or even track down a rare 1957 recording of Mitropoulos with the New York Philharmonic.
13 of 24 people found the following review helpful
No Tragedy in this version March 12 2006
By Richard Brookes - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD Verified Purchase
In my opinion, it was no tragedy that this recording has been "overlooked" for re-issue for so many years. The name of the work is one of the most descriptive ever given any piece in the history of western music. The emotions expressed in the "Pathetique" symphony are raw and tormented. No one could deny that Tchaikovsky must have been a soul in anguish to have penned this music. But this lifeless performance more than takes the edge off the experience, it removes the spirit entirely. Monteux, I can only assume, has no feeling for this music. I can only say that it is a waste of a brilliant orchestra to perform this work in this spiritless way and a waste of recording resources to have preserved the performance when there are so many excellent performances on disc.
10 of 19 people found the following review helpful
Defective ! SACDF layer another genre and artist Aug. 15 2009
By G. Feder - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD Verified Purchase
The cd version is excelent, the SACD version is pop world music !
They should give us a refund but there's no way to contact them.
They should fire the person on charge of quality assurance.


Feedback