Temperament and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
  • List Price: CDN$ 19.00
  • You Save: CDN$ 6.00 (32%)
FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Temperament: How Music Be... has been added to your Cart
Used: Good | Details
Sold by Daily-Deal-
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: This Book is in Good Condition. Clean Copy With Light Amount of Wear. 100% Guaranteed.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Temperament: How Music Became a Battleground for the Great Minds of Western Civilization Paperback – Feb 4 2003


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 13.00
CDN$ 8.48 CDN$ 3.34

Best Canadian Books of 2014
Stone Mattress is our #1 Canadian pick for 2014. See all

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought



Product Details

  • Paperback: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Vintage; 1 edition (Feb. 4 2003)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0375703306
  • ISBN-13: 978-0375703300
  • Product Dimensions: 13.1 x 1.5 x 20.3 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 9 g
  • Average Customer Review: 3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (38 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #392,183 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

From Amazon

Involving mathematics, philosophy, aesthetics, religion, politics, and physics, Stuart Isacoff 's Temperament invokes the tone of a James Burke documentary. However, the focus is not on a modern invention, but rather a modern convention: that of tuning keyboards so that every key is equally in tune--and equally out of tune.

With the existing literature tending to bog down in mathematical theory or historical tuning methods, Isacoff bravely attempts to make this seemingly arcane topic interesting to the general reader. He distills the mathematics and music theory into their simplest essences, and draws apt analogies from the everyday. He also generously peppers the text with the quirks and escapades of its more flamboyant central characters; the relevance of the information is often tenuous at best, but Isacoff has obviously done his homework, and he can be forgiven some frivolity.

Less forgivable is his neglect of "well-temperament." Namesake of Bach's masterful collection of 24 pieces (one each in all the major and minor keys), the well-tempered keyboard liberated composers from the howl of badly tuned keys in the way equal temperament did, while preserving the distinct quality of each key. It was a pragmatic and aesthetically rich solution that captivated composers and theorists for decades. Yet Isacoff reserves less than two pages for its description. (Perhaps he deliberately overlooked the topic since it doesn't fit well with his casting of equal temperament's opponents as rigid, dogmatic, and impractical.)

Despite its flaws, Temperament is an accessible guide to a fascinating topic seldom discussed outside musical circles. Though the book may not invigorate hard-core theorists, the amateur musician, armchair scientist, history buff, or plain old curious can glean plenty from it. The advent of digital keyboards--some of which can be tuned to historical temperaments at the flip of a switch--makes this an ideal time for the topic to be rejuvenated. --Todd Gehman --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

From Publishers Weekly

Isacoff, editor-in-chief of Piano Today magazine, tells the worthy tale of how musical temperament the familiar, seemingly fixed relationships between notes on an instrumental scale came to be taken for granted. After centuries of an accepted belief in the mathematical and divine governance of music, the 17th century saw the growth of a fierce debate over experimental new tuning methods. In the 18th century, the modern keyboard allowed for a new kind of tuning, known as equal temperament, whereby each pitch is equally distanced. New musical possibilities opened up, changing composition forever. Isacoff traces music theory contributions by da Vinci, Newton, Descartes, Kepler and Rameau. Unfortunately, he sometimes clumsily attempts to keep his audience's attention with irrelevant, if salacious, gossip e.g., philosopher Robert Hooke "recorded his orgasms in a diary," and King Louis XIV refused to eat with a fork. Meanwhile, he gives relatively short shrift to Kepler and Galileo. His ambitious historical canvas uses extensive secondary sources, but there are research gaps, such as his outdated portrait of Isaac Newton as a total "ascetic." Nevertheless, this harmonics drama will excite music geeks and music historians. (Nov. 24)Forecast: Knopf's prestige guarantees sales to major music collections, and Isacoff's national media appearances (NPR, etc.) may mean good general sales.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

--This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

3.2 out of 5 stars

Most helpful customer reviews

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By P. Vogel on Feb. 13 2004
Format: Paperback
I thoroughly enjoyed this book and, for the first time in my life, feel that I actually understand the issues around temperament. I would recommend this book to a lot of people but not everyone, as the number of negative reviews illustrates. The negative reviews for this book seem to fall into four categories-if you are in one of those groups then you may want to buy a different book:
1) The lunatic fringe: Examples here are: The review that castigates the book for abusing non-Western music (It's hard to see the point of this complaint since the intent of the book is to discuss the role of temperament in Western music--no real mention is made of any other kind of music); The review by the person who read only a 2 or 3 page excerpt of the book (apparently ignorance is no impediment to opinion); The person who hadn't read the book yet but would post a review when they had (see previous); The reviewer who felt that the book was all about sex (I missed that). And so on.
2) People who were unhappy about the lack of technical detail. While I am obviously disparaging the previous group, these reviewers have a valid complaint. These readers were looking for (as examples): actual scores; more math with more explicit discussion of the exact size of the differentials between similarly named tones; more technical terms (e.g. "hertz"). I have a good grounding in math, read a lot of technical material, but would probably best be described as a "music lover". I'm just not in these reviewers league. Since I don't read music, for instance, a score would be useless to me. For the audience that I represent, the level of technical detail worked very well and is appropriate for a "general interest" book. The author's description of the music met my needs and the prescence of a score wouldn't have helped.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Bradley P. Lehman on June 24 2004
Format: Paperback
This book is basically a rehash of Isacoff's major source, on which he relies too heavily: J Murray Barbour's 1951/72 "Tuning and Temperament". Barbour's own bias in his otherwise very well-researched book was the assumption that history is a mostly inexorable metamorphosis toward the current scientific triumph (really only a post-Industrial-Revolution conceit): equal temperament, against which all other systems must be measured and found deviant. Musicians didn't always have those same goals, as to quality of the sound they wanted.
Barbour and Isacoff don't say that they did, and they dance carefully around it while offering a facade of musical objectivity. But, the historical SWEEP they present still gives that incorrect impression, overall, because of the way they measure value by their own expectations (the modern triumph over supposedly more ignorant methods) instead of the positive expectations of the people who composed tonal music. I found it remarkable that as early as page 6 Isacoff cites equal temperament as "the final solution"...a chillingly accurate assessment, as to the way it eliminates diversity from tonal music, the way somebody else's "final solution" eliminated human beings.
Isacoff, to his credit, tries to present various sides of the historical issues; but the effort fails as he consistently errs on the side of embracing scientific triumph (as if equal temperament is the only scientifically plausible solution). He seems bewildered whenever presenting a scientist who never succumbed to the lure of the modern "final solution". More problematic, he tries too hard to sculpt personality profiles around all the major players in the historical record, and his observations degenerate into "ad hominem" dismissals of people he'd rather not have us believe.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Format: Paperback
Isacoff has tried to write a book on musical temperament for the general public, and parts of it are fun to read. It does have two major flaws: 1) he greatly overstates his case and deliberately omits a whole lot of information that contradicts his central thesis, and 2), he bends over so far backward trying to keep things non-technical that he not only falls down but ties himself up in knots in the process.
As a harpsichordist, I'm perhaps a little more flexible on the subject of an ideal temperament that is all things to all people, because my experience says there's no such thing. Of the various solutions that have been tried along the way, most of them served the needs of those who used them at the time. In fact, I was disappointed that his website sound samples included Chopin in just intonation and equal temperament, but no Byrd or Frescobaldi in meantone or Faenza Codex in Pythagorean, just to show us what all of those systems CAN do--especially on instruments other than the Steinway grand piano. Believe me, it's a revelation!
On the other hand, when he writes about phenomena such as Cipriano da Rore's _Quidnam non ebrietas_, it would be much more helpful to include a score and a brief explanation of the rules of _musica ficta_ (which were what caused all the trouble in the first place). I happen to own other books which include these, but I shouldn't need to consult my personal music library to read a book that is "for general audiences!"
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
By Anna Z. on Aug. 25 2003
Format: Paperback
Isacoff's approach to making temperament interesting can be summed up in the word "sex". If there is a bawdy detail to be found in even the remotest connection to a 'temperamental' anecdote, he drags it out. The result is a book that often de-rails and mixes very technical information with hearsay and gossip.
On the other hand, temperament is one of the most obscure and complicated elements of music, and even some musicians couldn't care less about it. So a book on temperament that made it to major bookstore chains is no small achievement. Still, the question of the book's audience is a complicated one... those of us who care about temperament to begin with could do with a few more musical examples interspersed with the text, whereas for those to whom temperament is a new concept, the idea of a smaller or larger fifth might need a bit more clarification.

Most troubling to me, however, was the writer's obvious bias towards equal temperament and towards the piano. For him, the whole of western history (and a lot of sex...) has existed with the purpose of developing and embracing the equal temperament, and that pinnacle among instruments, the piano. To those of us who like the sound of a harpsichord, or use different temperaments to achieve more in-tune music, the book's conclusion, and it's author's bias, is unhelpful.
Still I would recommend the book as a read, with the added stipulation that the reader then go out and listen to an early music concert in meantone.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most recent customer reviews



Feedback