Most helpful customer reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars
Less than her best!, Jan 28 2004
They say that novels must make sense, because life doesn't. And perhaps this is the draw of the book. Unrequited love, which doesn't make sense in the novel although it is a piece of life. This may be a slice of life, but was not all that convincing for me, and did not make me care for the characters. Perhaps the problem is that I felt so much for Lily Bart in The House Of Mirth, written 15 years previously, that these characters just didn't materialize for me in comparison.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Masterpiece, Jan 30 2003
Since it is almost ten years ago that I saw Scorcese's movie adaptation of this book, I thought that enough time had passed to read this book without preconceived notions and entirely on its own merits. I am glad I did, since the book clearly outshines the flick. Because so many reviews have been written on this novel and it has found its ultimate validation by justified inclusion in the list of hundred best books of the 20th century, there is little need for any additional endorsement. Yet, some of the reviews might scare some potential readers away and require some debunking. This book is no soap opera. While a romance is at the center of this book this does not imply that we are dealing with a romance novel. This book is not for women only. While the story approaches the point of mushiness at a few short instances, I think Wharton did an excellent job portraying the male central character of Newland Archer. By juxtaposing elements like self versus society, mind versus heart, practical versus desirable The Age of Innocence offers us with an awful lot in a small number of pages. Add to that I supreme writing style, that couples the female eye for detail with Dickensian wit in portraying New York's high society, and follow the beautiful archetypes from Paris and Helena, the original doubter and femme fatale, respectively, and you end up with a true masterpiece. On top of that, this book has one of literature's best final chapters with bitter, sweet and sarcastic undertones. Just having Welland sit in Paris on a bench close to the Dome des Invalides is priceless!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
Perfect cure for insomnia, Jun 12 2000
At the risk of offending the literary world, this is the slowest piece of fiction I have ever read. The story is about New York, circa 1880, and the stuffiness of the elite class. The author descibed her characters succintly in Chapter 33 when she wrote " It was the old New York way of taking life " without effusion of blood": the way of people who dreaded scandal more than disease, who placed decency above courage, and who considered that nothing was more ill-bred than scenes, except the behaviour of those who gave rise to them". The plot centers upon a engaged lawyer, Newland Archer. From one of the finest families in New York, he falls for an exotic beauty with a scandalous past, the Countess Olenska, who also happens to be his fiance's cousin. The young man struggles with whether he settles into the staid and boring life that his family name and status have earned him surrounded by people he despises, or does he follow his heart. He defends the charcter of the mysterious and exotic Countess Olenska, who is scorned by both family and friends. The Countess, equally in love with Archer, makes the hard decision to let Archer go so he can fulfill the life that has been planned for him. Beautifully written but dreadfully slow.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|