36 of 36 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
No more glasses on my face., Dec 7 1998
By PaulKelt@ix.netcom.com - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Art of Seeing (Paperback)
A number of years ago, when I had a restricted license (requiring glasses); I read Mr. Huxleys book on the recommendation of a friend. After about a year of doing several of the exercises I was able to pass the motor vehicle eye exam and throw my glasses away. I lent the book to someone who needed it and it disappeared, now I am looking for another copy. As my eyes change with age I need to review it again.
Paulkelt@ix.netcom.com
43 of 45 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Anyone losing eyesight should read this book., July 8 1999
By Jean-Denis Bertron - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Art of Seeing (Paperback)
This account of Huxley's personal experience with the Bates method is enjoyable, and useful. Unlike a hoax, the method doesn't require any leap of faith or that you wear a pyramid on your head. You have to work, reflect and learn. This is perhaps why the method isn't successful with everyone. It is far easier to pay for a pair of glasses. My advice: If you get your hands on this book, read it.
36 of 38 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Huxley was not conned, the bates method saved his sight, Jun 15 1999
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Art of Seeing (Paperback)
Huxley used the bates method to save his failing eyesight. The Bates method is not a hoax. I have used it for 20 years and continue to receive many benefits. Huxley was not selling a hoax, he was sharing the truth with the public.