CDN$ 13.68
  • List Price: CDN$ 19.26
  • You Save: CDN$ 5.58 (29%)
FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Add to Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

The Battle of Kursk Paperback – Oct 29 1999


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 13.68
CDN$ 13.68 CDN$ 8.11

Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with The Korsun Pocket: The Encirclement and Breakout of a German Army in the East, 1944 CDN$ 20.19

The Battle of Kursk + The Korsun Pocket: The Encirclement and Breakout of a German Army in the East, 1944
Price For Both: CDN$ 33.87

Show availability and shipping details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Paperback: 492 pages
  • Publisher: University Press of Kansas (Oct. 29 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0700613358
  • ISBN-13: 978-0700613359
  • Product Dimensions: 23 x 15.3 x 3.6 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 748 g
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (12 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #58,759 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)


Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Terence Tan Co on Feb. 5 2008
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Kursk is the largest tank battle ever fought but the myth is that many people think its one gigantic tank battle but actually its a series of large armored engagements and and its not only armor, a few million soldiers from both sides where involved in the fighting along with severall thousand aircraft. So its not only the largest tank campaign but also may be the largest air campaign ever fought over battlefield.

Using now available data from the Russian and German archives. This book gives a balanced view on the battle which dispels many myths about the battle.

The Soviets actually lost much more men and equipment than the Germans and the Germans can be said to have won tactically but lost strategically since the Germans threw everything they had in the battle and had to reserves to speak off while the Soviets had a lot of reserves of men and equipment at the back which won the battle for the USSR.

Also a myth dispelled in that the battle broke the back of the German military but in reality I think that while it was a significantly bad defeat of the German military, it was not a critically or catastrophic defeat(this is reserved for Stalingrad and Operation Bagration(1944)). It was significant that the Germans now lost the strategic initiative in the eastern front and this went to the Russians. Bad since the Germans lost a lot of men and materiall that they cannot really replace.

The books is very nicely written and done with a lot of maps, charts etc. and gives a nice flow to the battle though a non military enthusiast might find it hard to understand some of the terms, this book is the last authority on the battle of Kursk.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
By R M Wild on June 8 2014
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I found this book almost unreadable, the battle was one of the biggest of WW2 and the author chose to write a historic thesis, which was not what I wanted. If you want to know where each company or tank squadron was at any given moment this book is for you, if you are looking for an overview in more general terms look elswhere.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By R. A Forczyk on Feb. 1 2001
Format: Hardcover
The crux of this volume is new Soviet archival material on STAVKA decision-making but there is actually little new here. At less than 300 pages, this is somewhat short-shrift to a major battle. There is no discussion of air operations or partisans. Very limited profile of commanders and their forces, but excellent order of battle information. The Germans placed their faith in the 407 heavy tanks available (102 Tigers, 200 Panther and 105 Ferdinands) but they split them up too much; they should have massed their best weaponry in one sector. It is no surprise that ArmeeGruppe South made much better progress; they had much more artillery support (Center relied mostly on assault guns in direct fire mode), and much better engineer support (South had about eight corps-level engineer battalions but Center had no corps-level engineers). Glantz asks and answers several key questions: did Hitler really push Zitadelle (no, Zeitzler, Kluge and others pushed it beforehand but then blamed Hitler later), could the attack have succeeded in May (unlikely, given the weather and the disparity in forces) and what if the Germans had eschewed the attack and opted for a mobile defense (this would have bought them time, but there was no consensus for this strategy so it was highly unlikely to be adopted. It would also have required Hitler to relinquish command in the east to a CinC). Maps ok but uses cumbersome abbreviations. No terrain analysis.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Format: Hardcover
This is the definitive book on the battle of Kursk. It is by far the most complete assessment of the battle that has yet been offered. The authors do an excellent and thorough job of establishing the context of the battle (battlefield events up to the summer of 1943, as well as the situations that both armies were in, and what their leadership was trying to accomplish). Glantz and House offer a very detailed description of the fighting, often identifying regimental or battalion-level units. The description of combat is not particularly vivid or exciting, but if the reader is looking to find out where a particular regiment was and what enemy unit it was fighting on, say, July 12, the book is likely to have the answer. In this sense, the sheer volume of detail and factual material is enough to allow me to judge the book a success; it contains information that could otherwise be gained only by consulting many different sources.
That said, the real value of the book is in its assessment of several important analytical questions. Due to Glantz's unprecedented (at least on this topic) access to Soviet archives, the book is the first real assessment of Soviet troops, tactics, and plans. While Dunn's book on Kursk was able to offer some of this, Glantz and House are able to go much further. They are able to show how the Soviets used their knowledge of German plans to set their own plans. Glantz and House are also able to convincingly demonstrate, with Soviet archival sources, that the German delays did not change the result. Had they attacked earlier (May 1943), they still would have lost. Furthermore, they convincingly show that the initial period of defense against the German attack was but one step in an overarching operational plan to launch an offensive in the late summer of 1943.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Product Images from Customers

Most recent customer reviews

Search


Feedback