CDN$ 15.81
  • List Price: CDN$ 25.06
  • You Save: CDN$ 9.25 (37%)
FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25.
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Best of Erik Satie: 25 Pieces for Piano Paperback – Dec 1 2005


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback, Dec 1 2005
"Please retry"
CDN$ 15.81
CDN$ 11.48 CDN$ 32.98

2014 Books Gift Guide
Yes Please is featured in our 2014 Books Gift Guide. More gift ideas

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed



Product Details

  • Paperback: 80 pages
  • Publisher: Editions Salabert; 1 edition (Dec 1 2005)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1423403835
  • ISBN-13: 978-1423403838
  • Product Dimensions: 22.9 x 0.6 x 30.5 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 295 g
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #226,310 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 2 reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Cheap binding for excellent music Dec 12 2011
By J. Williams - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
I love the composer, but the publisher could have produced a more substantial book of his music. I took the book to a local printer who put it into a spiral binding. I came home and added very heavy cardboard to front and back covers just to keep the music standing up straight when I'm at the piano. I don't get it -- why would a publisher produce a flimsy book for such wonderful music?
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Great collection, poor typesetting April 13 2012
By Adam - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
Size and breadth of collection: 5 stars
Typesetting: 0 stars

To be clear, when I refer to typesetting I'm talking about the way the notes and staves look. The typesetting style changes several times in the collection, which is visually unappealing. In the modern ages of computers, there is no reason for this dissimilarity. My biggest dissapointment is the typesetting for Gymnopédie I, which is difficult to read and uses ink so light it's almost grey. The manuscript notes "copyright 1969" so I'm guessing they're using a 43 year old printing, which again is ridiculous in the modern age of computers. The piece is in the public domain even, so why use this old printing that is ugly and a little difficult to read.


Feedback