Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding
 
See larger image 
Share your own customer images
Publisher: learn how customers can search inside this book.

The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding [Paperback]

Eugene W. Hickok (Author, Editor)
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

 Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --   -- --
Paperback --   -- --

Product Details

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags
 

Customer Reviews

1 Review
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars A refreshing stroll through the amendments!!, Aug 20 2002
This review is from: The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding (Paperback)
This book is an amazing study. The book is ordered by amendment (or clause.) Within each part, the first essay focuses on the amendments original meaning and early history and the last essay focuses on the amendment today. Buyer beware. It seems that there is definitely a bias towards original meaning here, as each finishing essay comes to the conclusion that we've strayed from that original intent. But bias or not, can you blame them.

Of course that opens up an interesting dilemma that is unexplored in this book. Yes, we have strayed from original meaning (we've even FORGOTTEN the tenth amendments existence!) but this is only negative if you subscribe to 'original meaning' jurisprudence. As an aside, it seems most legal scholars and jurisprudential thinkers do not. Even Scalia and Posner, supposed conservatives, reject it; Scalia calling it 'the lesser evil.' This book assumes that readers share sympathy with original intent.

Where this book DOES prove its worth is in the attention payed to the fourth, fifth, ninth and tenth amendments- all of which are sadly neglected in legal dialogue of today. In fact, my favorite four essays were the ones focusing on amendments nine and ten.

So overall, this book's quality is high. On the whole, the essays are well written and exciting. But whether or not you've made up your mind on original meaning vs. broad principle jurisprudence, do check out "Interpreting the Constitution" edited by Jack Rakove.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.4 out of 5 stars (5 customer reviews)

10 of 11 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A refreshing stroll through the amendments!!, Aug 20 2002
By Kevin Currie-Knight "Education Grad Student" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding (Paperback)
This book is an amazing study. The book is ordered by amendment (or clause.) Within each part, the first essay focuses on the amendments original meaning and early history and the last essay focuses on the amendment today. Buyer beware. It seems that there is definitely a bias towards original meaning here, as each finishing essay comes to the conclusion that we've strayed from that original intent. But bias or not, can you blame them.

Of course that opens up an interesting dilemma that is unexplored in this book. Yes, we have strayed from original meaning (we've even FORGOTTEN the tenth amendments existence!) but this is only negative if you subscribe to 'original meaning' jurisprudence. As an aside, it seems most legal scholars and jurisprudential thinkers do not. Even Scalia and Posner, supposed conservatives, reject it; Scalia calling it 'the lesser evil.' This book assumes that readers share sympathy with original intent.

Where this book DOES prove its worth is in the attention payed to the fourth, fifth, ninth and tenth amendments- all of which are sadly neglected in legal dialogue of today. In fact, my favorite four essays were the ones focusing on amendments nine and ten.

So overall, this book's quality is high. On the whole, the essays are well written and exciting. But whether or not you've made up your mind on original meaning vs. broad principle jurisprudence, do check out "Interpreting the Constitution" edited by Jack Rakove.


8 of 9 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A Must Read, Sep 25 2000
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding (Paperback)
Anyone involved in law or public policy must read this book. Hickok, perhaps one of the leading political scientists of our time, brilliantly describes the origin of the Bill of Rights, what it meant to the early Americans, and how we should understand it today. It's not often that you have a guide to take you back in history to such an important time and to look at the historical context of a document as crucial as the Bill of Rights!

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Interesting and highly informative, a little out-of-date though, July 8 2008
By Kurt A. Johnson - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding (Paperback)
This book contains a series of essays on the U.S. Bill of Rights, all of which resulted from eight conferences conducted by the Center for Judicial Studies from 1985 to `87. At that time, the rising Conservative critique of the judicial activism displayed by the U.S. Supreme Court, resulted in a demand that the Court cease "finding" new rights under the Constitution by interpreting the Constitution using the original intent of the authors of the document. The issue finally came to a head when President Ronald Reagan nominated Originalist Judge Robert H. Bork to the Supreme Court in 1987.

This book is, in many ways, a polemic against "original intent," with just about every essay arguing against it at some point or other. Indeed, as the editor says, in the Introduction, "The purpose of these essays, in sum, is to contribute to the ongoing debate over constitutional interpretation and the proper role of `original intent' in the determining of what the Constitution means and in resolving contemporary constitutional questions."

However, that said, this book is so much more than just an attack on original intent. It does give an excellent history of how the various amendments in the Bill of Rights have been interpreted and used throughout the history of the United States. Personally, I found the essays on the Tenth Amendment to be extremely interesting.

Now, twenty-plus years are a lifetime in terms of Supreme Court rulings, and much has changed in that time. Judicial activism has taken on new forms, with justices using foreign laws to trump American precedence, and with Kelo v. City of New London turning the Fifth Amendment in an entirely new and disturbing direction. As such, in certain ways, some of the arguments made within this book are already out-of-date, and no longer apply.

But, that said, I did find this to be an interesting and highly informative read. Indeed, while you might expect this book to be dry and academic in tone, it is does in fact keep your interest, informing you but never boring you.
› Go to Amazon.com to see all 5 reviews  4.4 out of 5 stars 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews


Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category

Look for similar items by subject























i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback

Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?