Most helpful customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
Lynds does a great job with this genre...., July 6 2010
Gayle Lynds is an author I'd definitely heard of, but I'd never read any of her nine novels until I picked up The Book of Spies. I'm glad I finally did! And how could I not - there was a library at the centre of things - the legendary Library of Gold - Ivan the Terrible's collection of lost works. And the opening line of the book? " A library could be a dangerous place." Hooked! One of those books - The Book of Spies has been stolen and has come to light. The secret cabal that controls the library desperately wants it back and is willing to do anything. The CIA is brought in when a connection between the owners of the fabled library and terrorism is uncovered. Book curator Eva Blake and CIA operative Judd Ryder scramble to find the book and stay ahead of those that want them dead. Generally the world of espionage/spy thrillers seems to be dominated by men. Lynds is referred to as the Queen of Espioage and rightly so. The Book of Spies is action packed, the plotting is tight, the historical detail is fascinating, the characters are engaging.... shall I go on? There are a few coincidences near the end that seemed a bit too neat, but did not detract from my overall enjoyement of the book. The name of the game here is action. And I loved this library quote near the end of the book.... "Don't give me the cold tomb of a museum, but the fire-breathing world of words and ideas. Give me a library." Lynds has included author's notes at the end regarding the history used in her book - quite fascinating. If you enjoy Dan Brown and Robert Ludlum, then you would really enjoy Gayle Lynds. I would definitely read her again.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
Queen of Today's Spy Thrillers, April 16 2010
Chilling, breathtaking, moving, twisting, eye-opening, stimulating, nerve-wracking, entertaining, challenging, educating, action-packed . . . when it comes to a Gayle Lynds' spy thriller, whatever you can dream up in a literary ride of extreme fascination is what this author delivers. Her "what if" began with an article she read in the "Los Angeles Times " in 1989. Through the next 20 years plus, the mystery of Ivan the Terrible's lost library percolated in the back of her mind to become an obsession she called The Library of Gold. The more she researched it the more it absorbed her. Like Robert Ludlum's conspiratorial elite who lurked through many of his novels, the idea of such a rich and fabled library lent itself to another tale of hidden wealthy powerbrokers manipulating world events to their advantage. The CIA becomes involved in vengeance sniper attack on the father of one of its contract agents. In following up the victim's ties to an elite secret book club of the world's most powerful men, they discover a connection between the group's Library of Gold and a terrorist's bank account. To help, they engage Eva Blake, a rare books curator who has been wrongfully imprisoned for her husband's death. They release her. In London, while inspecting one of the "lost" books, she spots her husband alive. He turns on her and tries to kill her. Judd Ryder, assigned by the CIA to protect her, learns his recently assassinated father was a member of the secret book club, and in rescuing Eva joins forces with her in a hunt that takes them from London to Rome, Istanbul to Athens, and even into Afghanistan. Unlike "The Da Vinci Code," Gayle does not sacrifice pace to burden readers with heavy-handed history--that she contains in her Author's Notes at the end. Instead, she balances character development, plot, action and international settings with fine-tuned precision. In many current suspense and mystery novels, authors have abandoned the omniscient point of view, so it is a treat to return to the thriller master's technique of setting up each chapter from the long view of the camera to pan into the characters so we instantly see them and then of zooming into the close-up of the scene from the character's POV. In "Book of Spies," Gayle builds characters with idiosyncrasies that evolve from their legends. In this case, her heroine Eva Blake is a museum curator who specializes in ancient manuscripts. To do such work, she must have a retentive memory and an analytic gift. For her to communicate with her husband in Latin phrases is an intellectual game such vibrant minds relish, if only to serve their own egos. That this becomes her instantaneous style of response is not outside the realm of possibility but rather her norm. She has trained her mind in competition with her husband to see Latin one-liners to express what she observes. That she comes from a poor background where she has learned to survive as a pickpocket only proves how clever people with street smarts actually are when inspired to educate themselves by traditional standards. Once, learning karate was unusual for a young woman but even my twin granddaughters take it today. Young people with a goal are environmentally responsible and health conscious. Eva comfortably fits into our modern concept of an ambitious heroine. For Judd Blake, a former military intelligence officer, her quirks are what attract his respect and enhance his curiosity. She is a challenge that unbolts his guarded control. Spies have intellectual powers and skills few of us develop. Gayle engages us to participate in that world between the pages of the "Book of Spies." This novel ties history to greed, power, terrorism and spy chases. I love it! And to top it all off, Gayle has brought back the Carnivore from "The Coil."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Way too unbelievable, May 29 2011
By TechDawgMc "techdawgmc" - Published on Amazon.com
There are a lot of smart, educated people in this story. Unfortunately, almost all of the movement in the story seems to happen because of those smart people doing unbelievably dumb things. Sadly, this seems to be the state of thriller writing today. Create a lot of cliff hanging and make sure the action never stops and it must be a great read, right? Well, no. Not when you constantly find yourself shaking your head and saying "no way that would happen." It's kind of sad, really, because the concept of the book isn't bad, but the execution definitely is (bad, that is). Over and over again in the story there are "why would they do that?" incidents and "not a chance that would work" moments. Most of the time the heroes seem incapable of thinking of anything, and then--when they need a miracle--they seem positively clairvoyant. It's a weird combination. I'll grant that the book isn't boring. I almost stopped on it three or four times because of the number of ridiculous elements, but I wasn't ever bored. It's just not very good. There are better ways to spend your time.
10 of 15 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good International Spy Thriller., Mar 9 2010
By Philip R. Heath "Gadgets, Music, & Books" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Book of Spies (Hardcover)
Pre-release customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program
The Book of Spies is Gayle Lynds' spy/thriller novel, and it is an enjoyable read. The story is based on the Library of Gold which was Ivan the Terrible's collection of original works dating back throughout history which disappeared after his death. The Book of Spies is one of the manuscripts, and it has turned up in Lynds' novel that bears its name. The two central characters of the story are Eva Blake (a library/museum curator specializing in ancient manuscripts) and Judd Blake (a former military intelligence officer). The CIA is interested in The Book of Spies as there is thought to be a link to funding of terrorists, and they need the expertise of someone such as Eva to help them find the connection. They also bring in Blake to help as he has personal reasons to pursue the Library of Gold. The story that unfolds takes readers from North American to Europe and various parts of Asia. The story of the Library of Gold is one that conspiracy theory lovers will enjoy greatly. Using short chapters averaging about 5 pages each Lynds paces the story at a quick pace while walking the fine line between giving too much information and frustrating the reader. At times the plot twists were predictable, but overall I found the story compelling. The thing that I found with this novel that I haven't in a lot of others was that I felt strongly about the good guys and the bad guys. While the characters are not overly developed (but this isn't a character study), there weren't many that I was lukewarm about. Even though there are ties to terrorists, the primary focus of the story is the Library of Gold. The two things that keep this from being outstanding to me are the beginning and the end. The first three chapters covered three years in fifteen pages. The remainder of the main story takes place over a matter of weeks. It would have been nice to smooth this out a little bit as the first chapters form an impression in the reader's mind what to expect. I also thought the end of the story was a little anti-climactic and played out "by the book". All in all, though, The Book of Spies is a very enjoyable read. If you like espionage and conspiracy thrillers, give this a try. Overall: B
5 of 8 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
Ivan's Lost Library? Pure Cardboard and Zero Thrills, Aug 24 2010
By jackzvt - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Book of Spies (Hardcover)
Gayle Lynds can write a good thriller but this is not one of them. The characters are so wooden I have splinters in my eyes. This should really be 2.5 Stars. What Library of Gold? Ivan the Terrible's. Secretly buried under the Kremlin and no one can find it? Gggeeezz. She sure slings alot of hash in this story--reminds be of a very bad version of a Steve Barry novel. At least Steve uses real history...mostly. The set-up is looking all over for The Library of Gold, you know Ivan The Terribles book collection of ancient golden and be-jeweled illuminated books and we have the CIA and the evil Book Club grappling for power of this imaginary book collection. The guys in the Book Club are so wicked and evil and rich that I couldn't stop laughing at how hokey they are. I really expected a better read from this after reading all these 5 star reviews? There are so many "facts" which are not researched at all. Like Mahmud and Ghazni and Mahmud's diamond mines in Khost, Afghanistan. Mahmud got his diamonds conquering parts of India--not mines in Khost. Gggeeezzz and these are supposed to be $100 Trillon Dollar diamond mines? And the Book Club guys are supposed to be financially intelligent? I like ficton but this is pure fantasy. No thrills here and very predictible with a rushed ending. There are so many holes in this story, but the biggest hole is The Library of Gold itself which consists of books which are gold and jewel encrusted and very rare and some dating back to the Ancient Library of Alexandria. Priceless. Books that survived he destruction of Alexandria's Library??? Supposedly Ivan's Library of Gold (800 books) has some of the works of Homer and Aristophanes and Archemides etc etc etc from Alexandria and Homer's bookcover is covered in a dazzling gold as are most of the books. This is all wrong. They wrote on papyrus, animal skins or parchment scrolls--not books like we have today. The concept of books like we know today, called a codex (pages with covers) did not come about until 300AD +/-, let alone gold and jewel encrusted covers or illuminated manuscripts. Scrolls didn't have covers. The book codex, pages, cover, format began in 300AD as papyrus became unavailable for scrolls. So the books Gayle describes are just IMPOSSIBLE. Ivan's Library should have been papyrus, parchment or animal skin scrolls...not books. No gold. No jewels. No Illuminated Manuscripts. Next. Myth: The myth says that Ivan had all of the Library of Gold translated by Monks into Russian working beneath the Kremlin. So after all these centuries there should have been some of these books found written in Russian somewhere. Fact: Absolutely not one single book in Russian has ever been found. Of course I just can't believe she has characters who are being pursued using their personal cell phones and not throwaways. Duh. Talk about stupid spies? Eva and Judd are the two main characters and they are solid wood and poorly developed and they run from one mini-mayhem to the next quickly. It gets tedious. Almost monotonous...predictable. I never felt very involved with this story. No sitting on the edge of my seat...no suspense. Here is a piece of sappy narrative LOL, "She remembered how he had pulled her to him after she had almost pitched off the yacht, how he had wrapped his arms around her and held her tight, how he had kissed her hair...the wonderful sound of his pounding heart. His musky, wet smell." This is almost Harlequin quality. SPOILERS! SPOILERS! SPOILERS! DON'T READ. The Carnivore makes another appearance at the end and he is there because he is pissed that Chapmann has put out a hit on him with contract killers. The Carnivore is a killer with principles and a man of his word and he is at the island to kill Chapmann for trying fo have him killed. But, after drugging the book club for some strange reason he doesn't kill Chapmann? The story ends with the military suddenly invading the island and killing scads of the bad guys was clumsy. They must have killed 30 of them and our heroes killing another dozen. You get to the end and we have the evil Chapmann and the book clubbers who have arranged for all the murder and mayhem they don't even get a day in jail because their lawyers get them off the hook? C'mon Chapmann deserved killing, not a free pass. All in all it is an Ok read for the thriller genre but nothing special. I'm sure she follows some thriller formula which might please some readers but it didn't work for me and I wish it did. It does take a skilled writer to have so many story holes and yet still sell a million copies. I wasted my time reading this. Read at your own peril. Ludlum was the master of this genre, re-read one of his.
|
|
|