Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Canadian Century: Moving Out of America's Shadow Hardcover – May 21 2010


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 19.00 CDN$ 2.81

Best Books of 2014
Unruly Places is our #1 pick for 2014. See all

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought



Product Details

  • Hardcover: 272 pages
  • Publisher: Key Porter Books; First Edition edition (May 21 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1554702976
  • ISBN-13: 978-1554702978
  • Product Dimensions: 16.3 x 2.5 x 23.6 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 476 g
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #276,940 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Quill & Quire

The Canadian Century is tantamount to a manifesto for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, a policy think tank for which lead author Brian Lee Crowley serves as managing director. It is a political tract that, at points, indulges in the hard-driving tone and rhetoric of The Communist Manifesto, albeit with a very different agenda.

The agenda here is an argument for fiscal conservatism in line with Mike Harris’s Common Sense Revolution. The principle is to cut social programs and balance budgets, leaving those in need to the care of private citizens, not government. Government should spend, but only on infrastructure that facilitates economic growth. This, the authors tell us, is the essence of freedom.

For many who consider programs like universal health care evidence of how Canada’s national identity is distinct from that of the U.S. – we like to think that we are more compassionate and committed to the common good – this book will seem, well, un-Canadian. And this is where Laurier comes in.

Laurier’s economic strategy – intended to ensure that the 20th century would be Canada’s time to shine as the beacon of progress, prosperity, and freedom – included elements that sound like today’s fiscal conservatism: small government, low taxes, and free trade. By invoking Laurier, the authors are able to wrap their prescriptions in the maple leaf, suggesting that, rather than being un-Canadian, they are cleaving to Laurier’s national dream and inviting us to “take up Laurier’s challenge and finish the job.”

The authors refer to Canadian history to define the true Canadian identity as fiscally conservative. Given the book’s brevity, there are many omissions. For instance, in their comparison of the pace of government growth in Canada and the U.S., the authors don’t account for the pace of industrialization in the two countries.

One critical premise of this book is that liberty has made this country a desirable destination for new Canadians, and a nation of industrious people. Liberty here is understood as what Isaiah Berlin called negative liberty – freedom as the absence of external obstacles to individual choices. In the authors’ minds, our current obstacle is government management of the economy. They do not argue for positive liberty, which is freedom as self-realization, and which may require external elements, including the government, to provide the means.

About the Author

BRIAN LEE CROWLEY is the author of the bestseller Fearful Symmetry. The Globe and Mail publisher William Thorsell called him "the best writer on public policy in Canada today." He lives in Nova Scotia.

JASON CLEMENS is the director of research and strategic development at the Pacific Research Institute in San Francisco, where he specializes in fiscal policy. His articles regularly appear in Canada and the United States, including The Globe and Mail, the Financial Post, the Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal. He lives in San Francisco.

NIELS VELDHUIS is an author as well as director of fiscal studies and senior economist at The Fraser Institute. He also writes a bi-weekly column for the National Post and appears regularly on radio and television programs across the country.

Customer Reviews

3.5 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Work Gavin Andrew on June 6 2010
Format: Hardcover
Above all I took away a warning from this excellent book - don't lose the plot.

The book is an excellent re-visit to the key themes of Laurier's agenda for Canada. While it seems that Canada wasn't ready for Laurier's grand plan when he was voted out of office, it may be ready for him now.

With major pillars of his agenda in place (free trade, solid public finances), now is the time to maintain fiscal discipline at the provincial and federal level. It seems that Canadians have adopted that as good national practice and politicians have accepted this is what Canadians want. This book provides a wonderfully non-partisan view of how the 'Redemptive Decade' players spanned all parties, starting with the NDP on the prairies.

The book moves along briskly - too briskly in places. It might have been more enlightening to hear about how the leading provinces built a case for fiscal responsibility and how it differed province to province. From Ontario's Common Sense Revolution to Ralph Klein's more dramatic antics, some more stories may have been entertaining and enlightening.

This book reframes the Canadian identity and that is its stroke of genius. It lets Canadians know that their top potential will be realised when we follow the agenda by one of our greatest Prime Ministers. One has a sense that now could really be the dawn of the Canadian Century. But only if we make it.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Theodore A. Rushton on Aug. 27 2010
Format: Hardcover
This brief but nonetheless impressive one-note theme on the evils of big government is fatally flawed by its lack of pictures to explain why the Canadian GDP is merely 81 percent (by purchasing-power parity) of the United States.

Pictures? In a book of this scope, they're called "charts." For example, how does defence spending compare to the US? Mexico? Great Britain? France? Health spending? Original research? What is Canada's balance of foreign trade for the past 20 years compared to the US and Mexico? What are poverty levels, and middle income levels, in comparison?

Consider, for example, that Canada pledged in the Kyota climate change protocol to reduce its 1990 greenhouse gas emissions by 6 percent by 2008-12. Instead, emissions rose by 27 percent and will climb again this year, thanks to the "dig, baby, dig" mentality of the tar sands projects. Is this the cost of balanced budget virtue?

How can a country not be prosperous when it is the largest exporter of petroleum to the US? Why do the Australians want to buy Saskatchewan's potash? Perhaps, just as recent US prosperity was based on credit card debt, current Canadian prosperity is based on the fire sale of its patrimony.

Unfortunately, it is mainly a well-written right-wing screed against government spending. Granted, Canada exists today because government aid to the CPR meant British Columbia did not become 'American Columbia.' Would a little more government spending, rules and red tape have prevented the near extermination of the cod?

Lack of spending for the Avro Arrow was a major benefit to the California aerospace industry -- and now Canada plans to spend umpitty-billions to buy Made-in-the-USA F-35s?
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful By jacko on Oct. 24 2010
Format: Hardcover
This is easily the most boring book on economic history that I have ever read. Effectively a 140 page chronology of Canada's deficit reduction measures from 1992 to 2002. There is very little analysis beyond this laborious chronology and the book's focus is far too narrow to build anything that might hold a readers attention. To draw the conclusion that somehow the rest of this century might belong to Canada on the basis of its success at finally balacing the books seems naive. The sycophantic testemonials calling it a "wonderful" and "engaging" book are just sad. Do yourself a favour, read just the last chapter from page 145 onwards where some potential policy measures are laid out.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Look for similar items by category


Feedback