Most helpful customer reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Corrupting Influence of Evil, Oct 25 2007
I was unaware of this book until a couple of weeks ago, when I read an editorial dealing with its subject matter. The piece is entitled "Are Some People Born Evil?" by Brian Masters at the Daily Mail. Needless to say, the negative review sparked my interest. As for the book itself, I thought it was beautifully written, engaging, insightful, witty, scathing. The demonic framework is a welcome change in the dreary hyper-realism of the novels I have been reading recently. Not only is our narrator charming, but his insights into the baser aspects of human nature are apropos to the subject matter he deals with. Some have attempted to portray Hitler as a psychopath, that is, born without a shred of conscience. In fact, reading Masters' article, I got the impression that this is what Mailer did. (As an aside, Masters should really read a book or two on the subject. He is hopelessly ignorant when it comes to the idea that some are "born" evil. They are, and they are called psychopaths.) But instead we see how the combination of Hitler's heredity and his childhood environment shaped him into the asthenic lunatic that he became. Castle in the Forest is a great work that shows the path by which "evil" takes its corrupting course (with or without a demonic reality). Mental weaknesses influenced at a key point in time can shape an individual into a machine, an agent of entropy. My only complaint about the book is that a) I wanted it to continue, and b) with the possible exception of Hitler's older brother, there is no real portrayal of true lack of conscience. In Mailer's framework, evil is that which has lost conscience. Again, perhaps Mailer would benefit from reading the work of Robert Hare. Some are born without conscience. There is nothing there corrupt. And it is these individuals who come out of the framework when a person like Hitler gains influence. The world becomes their own. A "new world" for a "new man" -- a man without conscience or remorse, and a disdain for everything human.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 3 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Dull dull dull dull...you get the picture, Nov 8 2007
This review is from: The Castle in the Forest: A Novel (Paperback)
Ugh. Was this book ever a snooze fest. I could NOT get through this novel fast enough. The premise is good enough. In short, the concept presented in the novel is that Adolf Hitler was mentored by one of Satans daemons. And the little nudges given to Hitler here and there, turn him down a path of evil. All of this happens, of coures, without Hitler's knowledge. An interesting premise, which is why I was so disappointed when the novel failed to deliver. Mailer spends (in my opinion) enormous amounts of time covering the most banal aspects of Hitler's life as he grows up. Does anyone really care what his school life was like, or what his childhood was like playing with the other children? Snoresville! Give us some excitement. Give us some danger. Give us something. Anything! Anything to detract from the daily monotony of the Hitler family daily life, as presented by Mailer. While some may argue that Mailer had to present this side of Hitler's life to provide valuable insight in to what it was like for young Adolf growing up, I say no! Yes he had to show what life was like, but he didn't have the bore us to death to do so. This was my first Mailer novel, and if I have anything to say about it, it will also be my last.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
85 of 89 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Insight on Good and Evil, Nov 29 2007
By Stephen Williams "Stephen Williams" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Castle in the Forest: A Novel (Paperback)
The Castle in the Forest Astonishing Insight on the Nature Good and Evil This is a wonderful book to treasure and reflect upon. The precision of the writing makes it easy to read while the intensity of the psychological analysis gives the reader a lot to ponder. This book is a story of the development, creation and cultivation of pure evil. It is written from the perspective of a progenitor of evil. The narrator created evil on earth in a very amoral tone as if explaining directions to get to the grocery store. Norman Mailer shows banality of evil doers with the sharp style of a craftsman. The book is introspective and reflective without bogging down into sentimental fog and without ever becoming tedious. Mailer elevates the reader outside of the comfort zone and suspends them, as if he were in mid-air, to the very end of the book. Since the perspective is introspective and reflective it would have been very easy for it to have become tedious. Yet, not one page of the book seemed redundant, unnecessary or excessive in detail. Very little of the book is devoted to dialog. Mostly the reader is given the inner thoughts, rationalizations and motives of the characters. Yet the characters are very believable and all the more pitiful. The central theme of the book is the question of how any human being could become pure evil. This question is answered by presenting a very gradual cultivation of otherwise normal men by an outside force. Obviously the outside force is not necessary for evil to triumph. Mailer shows that the only prerequisites that are essential are excessive pride and a dose of ignorance. This book is provocative rather than comfortable; it opens more questions than it answers; and it can be offensive and demanding. Read it for all these reasons. Read this book.
104 of 125 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Brilliance, clumsiness, audacity, dullness, excitement, Jan 23 2007
By Wild Bill Jones - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Castle in the Forest: A Novel (Hardcover)
It has always been hard for people to find a balance when talking about Norman Mailer and his work. But it doesn't take a lot of intelligence to call a writer names, as a previous reviewer has, or to call all of the author's output garbage. (The review in question has, apparently, been removed or withdrawn as of 1/24) To address Norman Mailer realistically, readers have always had to accept that they would find extraordinary strengths and liabilities in the same work. Mailer's work and his persona, deeply intertwined for the past six decades, irritate the hell out of some people. Fine. But nobody's personal irritation wipes out an author's 60-year output. The Naked And The Dead, The Armies of The Night, The Executioner's Song, Miami and the Siege of Chicago, Advertisements For Myself, to name only five, are major books of our time. Plainly the previous reviewer, in handing down such sweeping and unsupported dismissal of Mailer's work, is superior to the pinheads on the committees that awarded Mailer two Pulitzer Prizes, a National Book Award, and countless other honors. Mailer's work is always a mixture of brilliance, clumsiness, audacity, dullness, and excitement. That is a big part of why he is so interesting -- the tension among these qualities. Some of these qualities are more pronounced in some of his works than in others. Many contemporary readers will find the premise of The Castle In The Forest outlandish -- the existence of a God and a Devil, and legions of lesser devils and angels, at war with each other, and intimately involved in human affairs. This notion is nothing new in Mailer's work, and he is completely serious about it. If you don't want to go with the premise, don't read the book. In this book about Hitler's early years, narrated, as readers probably know by now, by one of Satan's assistant devils, you will find many surprises, startling imagery, a deceptively subtle narrative strategy that yields more narrative torque than one might guess, long stretches that many readers will find tedious, many others that are striking and memorable and which could have come from no other writer, some laser-sharp flashes of action, some clunky missteps, and a lot of philosophizing. Many readers will find some of the philosophizing surprising and fresh and thrilling, and some of it obvious and self-congratulatory and irritating. Mailer is anything but predictable, and he takes this book's readers on a wild ride. What a great and rich show he puts on. If Mailer's ego puts you on edge, if you don't want to deal with the irritation you may feel in encountering uncomfortable ideas, or even foolish ideas right next to interesting and provocative ones, don't read the book. Mailer insists on throwing himself up against large questions that are obviously important to him, and that have been important to human culture down through the ages. His successes and his failures are themselves an epic. This book is an astonishing act of imagination, gall, willpower, wit, failure, success, all of it mixed together.... Quintessential Mailer. Five stars not because it is an unqualified success, which it isn't, but because it is such a spectacular show, such an amazing performance by one of our most interesting and enduring writers.
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Insight on Good and Evil, Aug 31 2008
By Stephen Williams "Stephen Williams" - Published on Amazon.com
The Castle in the Forest by Norman Mailer Astonishing Insight on the Nature Good and Evil This is a wonderful book to treasure and reflect upon. The precision of the writing makes it easy to read while the intensity of the psychological analysis gives the reader a lot to ponder. This book is a story of the development, creation and cultivation of pure evil. It is written from the perspective of a progenitor of evil. The narrator created evil on earth in a very amoral tone as if explaining directions to get to the grocery store. Norman Mailer shows banality of evil doers with the sharp style of a craftsman. The book is introspective and reflective without bogging down into sentimental fog and without ever becoming tedious. Mailer elevates the reader outside of the comfort zone and suspends them, as if he were in mid-air, to the very end of the book. Since the perspective is introspective and reflective it would have been very easy for it to have become tedious. Yet, not one page of the book seemed redundant, unnecessary or excessive in detail. Very little of the book is devoted to dialog. Mostly the reader is given the inner thoughts, rationalizations and motives of the characters. Yet the characters are very believable and all the more pitiful. The central theme of the book is the question of how any human being could become pure evil. This question is answered by presenting a very gradual cultivation of otherwise normal men by an outside force. Obviously the outside force is not necessary for evil to triumph. Mailer shows that the only prerequisites that are essential are excessive pride and a dose of ignorance. This book is provocative rather than comfortable; it opens more questions than it answers; and it can be offensive and demanding. Read it for all these reasons. Read this book.
|
|
|