The Clitoral Truth: The Secret World at Your Fingertips [Paperback]

The book obviously does provide an extensive review of female genital anatomy; although, I found it ironic that after maligning all modern sex manuals as showing "cartoon genitals" for women, that the author chose a cartoonist (Fish) to provide the book illustrations. The real disappointment though is that there is very little is the way of detailed information about sexual practices. Ms Chalker may "mention" masturbation and outercourse but truth be told she does not "discuss" them in a fashion sufficient to educate the reader to any degree. As a case in point she repeatedly makes mention of women using vibrators to enhance their sexual pleasure, yet never does she describe their most appropriate application or model choice in the way Betty Dodson has. Similarly for many other "mentions", the reader must already understand the mechanics of the topic or be left to pursue further research. So it is really quite a stretch to describe this as a sex workshop in book form - it is not. It is as much as anything a book on sexual politics, which is fine, if only it had been marketed as such.

So I would caution the heterosexual male population to not be misled by the appealing nude female torso on the cover or the jacket notes suggesting this book is intended for a mainstream audience. Recognize this book for what it is and proceed at your own risk. Personally I found Felice Newman's "Whole Lesbian Sex Book" to be far more sex positive and inclusive, even though I am obviously not the intended audience in that case. Go figure!

Postscript (9/6/02)
Upon further review it would appear that this author has made a rather basic error in her purportedly updated anatomy - namely she classifies the clitoral body (or shaft) and crura (legs) as spongy tissue analogous to the male corpus spongiosum surrounding the urethra, and distinct from the corpus cavernosa that they are more obviously analogous to. She further identifies the vaginal bulbs as cavernosa when in fact they are spongy erectile tissue. While this may seem like a minor point to some, it certainly confuses the issue of male/female homology. Interestingly this was easily cleared up by a quick reference to the online version of Gray's Anatomy, which would seem to invalidate a very basic premise of the book, that the information on the clitoris is simply not available. While "marriage manuals" may indeed lack a good anatomical foundation, this information has not been "lost" by the medical community, and the tissue in question is clearly identified as erectile which would suggest a sexual function. So one is left to wonder whether this author is suffering from some sort of self-serving myopia when it comes to her interpretation of what the medical establishment knows and doesn't know.

Finally having now seen the original drawings from Suzann Gage's book, A New View of a Woman's Body, (in Betty Dodson's video Viva La Vulva) I can certainly say the diagrams in this book are truly poor, being as I indicated earlier, of cartoon quality. A shame Ms Chalker could not negotiate use of the original drawings from her friend and coworker, and had to rely instead on a longwinded reference to Ms Gage's work to give the vague impression they were included.