| |||||||||||||||
Product Details
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
one of the best books in philosophy of mind,
By
This review is from: The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Paperback)
This is an incredibly important book, as it cogently & decisively challenges a view of mind that is something of a received dogma in philosophy of mind, namely, materialism/physicalism. Chalmers is machine-like in tearing down the superficially strong but ultimately weak arguments from the materialist side. Any impartial reader will come to the conclusion that something is very wrong w/ materialism; the only ones who will deny this are those in the hold of the dogma themselves.Reading through the other reviews here, I have noticed several criticisms the indicate that the reviewer did not read the book in its entirety. For example, one review complains that Chalmers does not recognize the difference between conceivability & possibility, when it fact a significant chunk of the book is devoted to exactly that distinction, w/ Chalmers making it quite clear why the distinction is irrelevant to his argument. One methodological advantage of the book, by the way, is that it is readable by people w/ all levels of philosophical background. Sections that are largely technical are marked w/ an *, and the book is structured so that these sections can be skipped w/o losing the main story & argument of the book. Beware, however, of attempting to critique Chalmers' view on technical philosophical grounds without reading the * sections (as the reviewer mentioned above seems to). Anyway, this is a well-written, important book by one of the most interesting & exciting philosophers around. Anyone interested in philosophy of mind or cognitive science will do well to own it.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
An interesting take on the mind/body problem,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Hardcover)
I would recommend this book to anyone interested in the philosophy of mind or even for anyone who has ever puzzled over the phenomenon of consciousness. Chalmers argues that consciousness is a fact over and above any physical/functional brain processes. His position has the feel of cogency. After all, prima facie it is difficult to conceive of two more different states of affairs than (say) the smelling of a rose and some neural/chemical brain activity. The problem is that when Chalmers delineates the implications of his view one can't avoid the impression that he has reduced himself to absurdity. For example, he ends up with an epiphenomealism of sorts according to which our consciousness states don't affect our behavior. On this point, I, at least, had to ask myself whether I had more faith in Chalmer's arguments or more faith in mental causality.Nonetheless, I really liked the book. It is (with the exception of chapter 2) easy and fun to read, and Chalmers has a wealth of really cool ideas. I enjoied it more than just about anything else on the philosophy of mind that has crossed my path.
4.0 out of 5 stars
very good views!,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Paperback)
I thought this book was a great challenge to the neuro-world of junkies who persistes that consciousness is a product of materialism. David Chalmers has done a great job of bringing a different view to the table as he speaks of the phenomenal world vs. the proto phenomenal world. The only thing that i wasnt so in agreement about was the zombie point of view, as i have already mention quite a few times consciousness cannot be reduced or deduced only illusionated as being reduced, to me it is a matter of the perception of a particular entity that is suffering from a incomplete reality of wakefulness, im sure some [body] will say that this is just a personal construct, and sure it would be for any limited person who cannot see pass the limitations of human logic which is grossly our opinions of how we (relate) to what nature reveals to us. Just imagine how lost we would be without eyesight lmao! a lot worser than most are now. As Chalmers pointed out a third personal point of view can only reveal so much and that is mostly face value information, i see an open program so please lets take away the shock value of presuming that what everyone conceives about their reality is purely just their opinion with out any outside influence. Form being form is limited to understanding what consciousness is, as oppose to what it isnt. If form can only identify with form then how can you truly understand the difference between objective form and subjective form inwhich their is a big difference. Consciousness is not a product of the brain, the brain is a mechanism for the experience of this ideal world were the experience of being created is the main drive............. i am still waiting for a sound explanation for coming into being without there being any intentionality that backed such a force, also no such accident has ever been confirmed about consciousness being a miraculuous whatever from some freak collision of free particles. Question to all serious philosophers, do you really need light to create form or ideas, also what objective forms could be seen without contrast? So to me consciousness is much more than what we can determine or put into a book as if we are beyond limitations, please! we are constantly interacting with our objective reality to improve on our limitations! lmao! and ppls views of consciousness is no execption, so enjoy your limitations ppl is just one instant that is point to point. Consciousness is the true experiencer!
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
|
Most recent customer reviews |
|