The Crusader: The Life and Tumultuous Times of Pat Buchanan [Hardcover]

When I first opened the book, I wondered if I would finish reading it, but it quickly drew me in and in several days I was done reading it and am writing a five star review. "The Crusader" is a well written, most interesting look at a complex and fascinating man, Pat Buchanan. An Irish Catholic who would love like Mel Gibson to see the church go back to Latin masses, Pat loves to eat and drink. Pat is a very intelligent man who knows his history. He is a crusader for the little person and unwavering in his defense of truth as he believes it to be. Pat in his three attempts for a presidential bid expressed ideas that were later picked up by the Tea Party movement. His latest book, "Suicide of a Superpower" is a five star book. I have also read his book "Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War" which is in a class by itself. While it received much criticism when it was first published and during his presidential bids, undoubtedly by some who had never read it, I also gave it a five star review. Pat Buchanan is a walking history book and most interesting writer. Being so intelligent, people of lesser intelligence either criticize him without having read what he wrote, none of his books are short, or fail to understand what he means. I've found him to be almost prophetically right on in his assessment of political events. If you are interested in the life story of a most fascinating man you'll enjoy "The Crusader."

Ordinarily, I am suspicious of biographies which are written while the subject is still alive. Time is often essential to clarify a person's place in history. Yet Timothy Stanley's biography of Pat Buchanan, titled The Crusader, is a worthy exception, for two reasons. First, and sadly, most of Buchanan's work is behind him. He may write a few more books yet--including, one hopes, his memoirs--but Pat and the paleo-conservatives seem to be cursed to wander in the political wilderness for the foreseeable future.

The second reason relates to the way Americans incorporate out knowledge of history into the narrative through which we practice politics. That narrative paints one side as the forces of good and the other of evil. Buchanan is ignored because he ill fits into the rigid dogma of left and right as diametrically opposed forces. That's unfortunate, because he has much to teach us.

After two brief chapters on Buchanan's early life, the first part of the book deals with the man as a mostly loyal Republican. Probably the most curious aspect of Buchanan's early policies was his hawkishness. In 1970, "Pat sent another memo to [President Nixon] saying that he should hit the antiwar protesters more... What the masses wanted [Buchanan] said, was a 'fighting president' not a 'professional president.'" Stanley also captures Buchanan at the 1968 Democratic National Convention, where he watched Mayor Daley's police throttle protesters from atop a balcony with the writer Norman Mailer. To the latter's shouts of "Pigs! Fascists!" Buchanan returned, "Hey, you've missed one!"

In the second part of the book, we see Buchanan assert himself against a wayward party. Believing that the Republicans had lost their way, he ran against the incumbent George H. W. Bush in 1992, which set the stage for a more serious, but likewise abortive, attempt to secure the nomination in 1996. The disastrous Reform Party run in 2000 is recounted as well. Ever the populist, Pat longed for a return to the social cohesion of the 1950's, perceived or real. To that end, he denounced NAFTA and argued for a tariff to protect manufacturing jobs. Whether or not Buchanan's policies would have helped is a matter of debate; what is irrefutable is that fewer and fewer Americans now work in the manufacturing sector.

In 1991, Pat added a new phrase to the political lexicon: vulture capitalism. In Stanley's summation: "Socialism was dumb, but unfettered capitalism was evil... At the center of the family was a gainfully employed father." Conservatism exists to protect the family; ergo, it had a duty to restrain corporatist forces that threatened to tear families apart.

Stanley highlights other better known aspects of his political philosophy. We see Pat as an accused racist and anti-Semite for his restrictionist views on immigration and his charges that the U.S. was conducting its foreign policy at the behest of the Israel lobby. The author reminds us that there are other sides to Pat, too.

The Crusader can make for a somber read, as when Pat says: "Mr. Dole put the interest of the big banks--Citibank, Chase Manhatten, Goldman Sachs--ahead of the American people." Truly, the Republic has been rotting for quite some time.

Most depressing of all is how little Pat's influence seems to be felt in today's Republican party, the party of war and vulture capitalism. The best that can be said is that some of Buchanan's positions are shared by libertarians such as Ron Paul. Having been banned from MSNBC for heresy against the secular orthodoxy, Buchanan's influence is likely to diminish even further. One suspects that Pat understands; for as Frederick D. Wilhelmsen observed, "Christendom is honor and the fatherland and man with his back to the wall. It is the glory of lost causes and the splendor of certain defeat."

Stanley's new biography on Pat Buchanan is hardly the objective piece of writing its author claims. "Crusader" never misses an opportunity to insert some snarky comment about conservatives or the conservative movement. There are some interesting pieces of Buchanan's career detailed here but the author's apparent, political bias leaves one to wonder how much credibility they should be given. If you are inclined to dislike Pat Buchanan before starting this book you might find it a bit more to your liking.
Buchanan's books get pilloried for broaching subjects that violate the liberal orthodoxy and make even spineless Republicans scatter for the tall grass. He is only documenting what most informed citizens instinctively know - sans the data to back up those instincts. Another example of the fable of the "Emperor's New Clothes". Few of us today exhibit his courage in inviting the wrath of the "political correctness police". Pat is a national treasure who deserved better than Stanley's cheap shots.
a generous 3 stars

REVISED**********
I fear I owe Mr. Stanley an apology. The first paragraph of the above review was based on a hasty perusal that evidenced, in my opinion, a few gratuitous snipes. Having encountered far too much of that treatment in other political writing my first reaction was rather negative. I have since had the opportunity to read, from cover to cover, the above book and found it very balanced and insightful. Stanley introduces us to a lot of the behind-the-scenes campaign strategies and machinations that us lay folks rarely see. There are also many interesting vignettes of the important players in Buchanan's circle of ideological fellow travelers. Again, my apologies Mr. Stanley, for not giving you an initial fair reading and appraisal. I would encourage anyone interested in Pat Buchanan's career to delve into "Crusader" for an insightful look into his political life. It is obvious Mr. Stanley did his homework here and should be given his due.

note: The second paragraph in my initial review was a general criticism directed at the broader media and its "pundits". It had nothing to do with Mr. Stanley's book or his viewpoint. If I was unclear in this regard another apology may be in order.

› Go to Amazon.com to see all 11 reviews  4.8 out of 5 stars